Jump to content

Beware - car crash scammer opposite Co-op


Recommended Posts

I've just had a run-in with a car crash scammer. I'm wondering if anyone else might have had a similar experience. I parked opposite the Co-op in Lordship Lane (10.15pm) where I was going to buy some dog food. I started parking behind a man, with plenty of room behind me, but he then indicated he was pulling out, so I waited until he did so and went into his space easily, so I was nowhere near the car behind me. Actually, even if he hadn't pulled out I would have had plenty of room to park.


When I got out, a man, who looked more Middle Eastern than Turkish though, with black hair and was quite smartly dressed in a black suit) said to me: 'You hit my car'. I laughed and said I was at least a meter away from it and could in no way have hit it and I then had a close look at the front of his car, to make a point, and told him it didn't even have a mark on it. When I came out of the Co-op, a white accomplice of his, or someone he'd paid with a beer (he was drunk and had a newly poured pint of beer on his table outside the restaurant) said to me: 'You hit his car twice, I saw it.' I then laid into him for lying and asked if his full beer glass had just been bought for him by the scammer. Interestingly, a waitress came out of the restaurant and told this man to sit down and shut up, so he obviously had form, bless him. I then thanked her and drove off. The man who made the initial accusation was nowhere to be seen at this point. It might have been a one-off, but do watch out. I shall be warning my insurer tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a similar thing parking at the southern end of Peckham Rye and builders leapt out and said I had hit a sports car behind me. I was nowhere near it and there was no mark. I got my phone out and said I was phoning my insurers and they went back inside. I warned my insurers that I thought it was a scam. I don't think the men even owned the car! This was a couple of years back.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for that Huggers. It's a huge scam. But this one in Lordship Lane seemed adept at it, and even 'paid' an accomplice 'witness'. Damn their eyes! Be on your guard, East Dulwichians! And take photos. Unfortunately, I didn't have my mobile with me to do that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My husband has had incrediable problems with the insurance when out of the blue someone has accused him of clipping his car in under hill road one day when he hadn't even used his car that day and we don't even live on that road so really don't know how they managed that but in the end once we'd had loads of phoning around the insurance can down !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you have a high end car that you service via an authorised garage they'll download lots of car data - that data is usually stored in Europe on the Channel Islands - so Police can't do a mass trawl of speeding, etc. So it may be possible to ask an authorised garage to report on certain days car data in the cirucmstances you described dimples.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dimples Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My husband has had incredible problems with the

> insurance when out of the blue someone has accused

> him of clipping his car in under hill road one day

> when he hadn't even used his car that day and we

> don't even live on that road so really don't know

> how they managed that but in the end once we'd had

> loads of phoning around the insurance can down !


This is wasting your time however - maybe a whole weekend -

I'd be tempted to charge it at an hourly rate. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had an incident last week which I couldn't decide was genuine or a scam. Someone had parked part way across our driveway. We managed to get pass it when going out but when came back had a note through our door saying we had hit their car. The irony was that firstly, the car was illegally parked, and secondly, we had been forced to turn left because of the way it had been parked, making it impossible for us to have caused the alleged damage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...