Jump to content

Labour councillor Chris Gonde's steps down in South Camberwell ward anyone know why?


trinidad

Recommended Posts

Just received my poll card in South camberwell ward, as Labour councillor Chris Gonde has stepped down. Does anyone know why???


We go to the polls on 15th October 2015.


The candidates are as follows (in alphabetical order):


Benjamin Maitland, Lib Dems


Christopher Mottau, Conservatives


Eleanor Margolies, Greens


Octavia Lamb, Labour


Stephen Govier, All People's Party.



The polling station has also been changed to Amott road baptist church in Armott road se15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what he is quoted as saying to Southwark News http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/by-election-called-after-labour-councillor-steps-down/ :


"

A second Labour councillor has stepped down in less than six months, citing a poor work-life balance in his resignation statement.


Chris Gonde, who was elected eighteen months ago to the South Camberwell ward, admitted that he found it ?increasingly difficult? to balance his many business responsibilities with his family life.

"


I wish him and his family well.

Bit surprising he couldn't wait until next March when the by-election could have taken place alongside the GLA elections avoiding the council spend ?20,000 to run this by election on standalone basis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he can't serve his constituents as fully as he feels he should (for whatever reason) then it's only proper that he should stand down.


Putting money before democracy might seem ok on Tooley Street but for the sake of ?20,000 it's better that his ward has a new councillor now rather than hanging on for six months with no representation at all. And the cost of the standalone by-election is only ?10k more than will be squandered on the Melbourne Grove segregation barrier study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Abe_Foreman,

The ward does have two other councillors. We also have rules to support councillors being unavailable for up to 6 months or longer. So to suggest South Camberwell wouldn't have representation is to suggest the other two councillors aren't available - which they are. it is a shame to spend ?20,000 when money is quite so tight. But if he felt he really couldn't wait and was told the cost to our community in hard cash then he is obviously has to leave.

And I'm sure he found this decision really hard. Good luck to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris is a good man. He lives in my road and we worked in the same laboratory at King's. I like him. Although our politics don't coincide, I was pleased that he was my councillor. I met him by chance at the Sainsbury's superstore the morning after I learnt that he was stepping down -- we chatted. He hopes to continue to be active in politics, he told me, but he can't at the same time do justice to both councillor duties and his two girls, who are under ten. (Maybe his failing to respond to Mustard's e-mails is part of being too thinly stretched.)


I suppose there's no knowing how much of your life being a councillor will devour till you are sworn in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...