Jump to content

why have we got a 20mph zone?


macutd

Recommended Posts

Why have we got a 20mph zone, if nobody pays any attention to it?

It must have cost a fortune of our money to set up.

Even the speed platforms newly put onto east dulwich grove, supposedly to restrict traffic to 20 mph are completely ignored.

It is not even enforced by the police.

So WHY??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen cars observing the 20 mph speed limit being overtaken on lordship lane. I agree there should be stricter enforcement, to help embed the culture change. I presume this council decision was taken having consulted the police? If so what is the strategy to enforce?


Have any other councils made this decision? I think it is the way forward but it needs to be zone 1 and 2 at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umerton,


The police were consulted. They objected to it and thought it was a stupid idea, in that it would create confusion,probably leading to more reckless driving. How right they are. I also think the police indicated they would not enforce.


s'wark Labour launched this with the bonkers idea that it would be self-enforcing.


I try hard to stick to the limit but find it very hard to do when cars accelerate and suddenly pull out to overtake or when they tailgate and falsh their lights in an attempt to force you to go faster. Cyclists also regularly whizz past down th hill and weavw in and out. I too am increasingly resentful at being made to endure this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stark stats supporting 20mph, in The Guardian today:


The road safety charity Brake has some charts that grimly expose the fallacy of this argument [that 20mph is too slow]. If a pedestrian runs in front of a car that is three car lengths away then a driver travelling at 20mph can stop in time. If the car is travelling at 30mph they would hit the person with the equivalent force of the pedestrian falling from a third-storey building.


The Brake link in the article is http://www.brake.org.uk/info-and-resources/facts-advice-research/road-safety-facts/15-facts-a-resources/facts/1255-speed


Edited to add article link: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/01/the-sun-speeding-drivers-campaigns-speed-cameras?CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sydenham Hill is significantly more dangerous since the 20mph zone has been introduced. Everyone used to happily tootle along at 30 without a problem. Now the odd person does 20, everyone behind them gets gets furious and overtakes wildly. Bonkers.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this was part of the Labour manifesto for Southwark when they were elected. So, because of the bizarre way our er, democracy works, they have a mandate from you, the people, to do this. I think it's part of the climate change argument which, either way, could be seen by some as another form of control over our behaviour (is the spell check on this in American?). If you were a bit cynical about politicians that is. Which of course I am not. Trust them completely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's tricky. There are stretches of Lordship Lane, especially the main bit of the high street, where it makes perfect sense. But Sydenham Hill feels horrendously slow. And, as others have said, if it's not going to be enforced then it feels a bit pointless.


That said, it has been shown that average speeds do reduce in 20mph zones, even unenforced ones. I attended a presentation by the City of London Police who produced some data that showed average speeds in The City have reduced by 2mph since the introduction of the 20mph zone. Which doesn't sound like much, but they reckon it reduces the risk of death from a car on pedestrian collision by as much as 25%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with a 20mph limit - in fact it makes a lot of sense on residential roads. But it needs to be enforced. And I don't mean speed bumps... actual traffic police, or average speed cameras.


That said, the SE of the city also needs high frequency, fast and reliable public transport. If the tube, Boris bikes, tram, or similar were an option, I'd probably get rid of my car all together and I am sure many others would too.


It is ridiculous that the tube network is almost entirely missing from the Southeast of London and we have to rely on a rail service similar to those which serves far less densely populated, semi rural areas outside of the Capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry road is allegedly a mile long which means it takes 3 minutes to drive it at 20mph or 2 minutes at 30mph. I agree it feels really slow at 20 but in fact it probably doesn't make a lot of difference if you consider having to stop at traffic lights etc. the fatality rate at 20mph is 2.5% compared to 20% at 30mph (according to RoSPA) so whilst it is possibly a bit slower- for me it is worth it in residential areas.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I understand your point njc97. Speed limits are not enforced adequately, that's my point - and whilst I welcome slower speeds on residential roads, i don't think painting '20' on the street will make a lot of difference. It is culturally acceptable to speed - look at today's front page of the Sun. It will require a concerted effort (a large part of which is enforcement) to change that. Also, fast, frequent public transport options in our Captial city (all parts of it, not just three quaters, needs to be ensured. Together, less traffic and slower traffic would make London a much more pleasant, efficient and prosperous place imo.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's part of a class war designed to attack your personal liberty??



Who's supposed to be on which side? *confused* - and how come the bright blue City of London are on the same side as deep red Southwark?



That said, the SE of the city also needs high frequency, fast and reliable public transport. If the tube, Boris bikes, tram, or similar were an option, I'd probably get rid of my car all together and I am sure many others would too.


It is ridiculous that the tube network is almost entirely missing from the Southeast of London and we have to rely on a rail service similar to those which serves far less densely populated, semi rural areas outside of the Capital.



You know about this..?


https://www.bromptonbikehire.com/docks/2735-peckham-rye


A touch expensive at ?20 annual membership plus ?2.50/day, but gets the job done. The huge plus with Bromptons is, you can take them on all public transport at any time of day. They're even allowed on the bus, if the luggage space is free.


Gets you discounts on car club membership too - but not on one that has any vehicles round here :(


If you need to hire a car (or use car clubs) semi regularly, Bromptons are also mighty handy in conjunction with that, in that you can ride a couple of miles to pick the car up & chuck it straight in the boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, I'm looking for an entertainer for my 9 year old son's birthday party. Looking for someone who can organise some games for the kids as my son and his friends are quite active. Regards, Sue
    • My son’s primary school hatched duck eggs, probably under this scheme around 12 years ago.  We were all very upset to hear that 2 of the (5 year old) boys had knocked the incubator over & all eggs smashed.   feeling a lot less sad about that now!  
    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...