Jump to content

co-op peckham rye


puzzled

Recommended Posts

the horrible co-op "supermarket" by peckham rye has been shut down and it is being taken apart. a sign outside says "new store coming soon" anyone know what it will be? I know the co-op took over somerfield (what a marriage) so maybe that has something to do with it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it is So horrible. Ok so it could be better but I really like the Co-op. It does great chicken, and at a good price. I hope it stays as Co-op, and not something like Londis or Budgeons. I don't like the stuff those two shops have.


The Co-op could certainly do with a revamp. Sometimes it smells as if a rat has piddled in there, and so often the fridges are broken and they don't have any cold foods. Also the staff doesn't speak very good English at all. Please keep us informed as to what is going on there as that is my nearest 'corner shop'. Ta in advance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue - sorry to disappoint you regarding my use of language.


However, collective nouns such as 'staff', 'family' and 'government' can, and should, correctly be used as singular forms. I work as a BBC broadcast journalist, and am very aware of the appropriate forms to use.


Examples: 'The staff doesn't speak very good English to its customers' is correct.


Staff is acting as a unit here.


When we refer to a group as an impersonal unit, (and I don't know the Co-op staff so they are an impersonal unit), we should use the singular verb - and relative pronoun 'which'. The BBC should be followed by a singular verb as should 'committee', 'New labour' 'government' and 'staff'.


The exceptions are 'people' and 'police'.

These collective nouns always take a plural verb. There is no singular form of these nouns.


In some contexts it sounds natural and is certainly idiomatic to use a plural verb with a noun - although that doesn't make it correct. Perhaps this is why you felt the need to rather facetiously correct my English on this forum.


To that end, I found your posting to me extremely sarcastic and very rude indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lighten up Lizzie.

Sue's post was accompanied by a smiley and a "sorry could't resist".

She was clearly being tongue in cheek and not being rude.


Just because you're a BBC broadcast journalist AND you can write sentences trying to explain stuff, doesn't mean you're perfect. I am not aware of always hearing collective nouns regularly being used in the singular and I watch BBC News, me. It sounds ODD to say "the staff is...", simnple as that. I'll go further and say it sounds wrong.


So I would also have written "the "staff don't speak good English" and I have a Masters Degree in English and everything! So nerr.


Isn't it.


And here's a few commas you missed out ,,,,,,,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am afraid that accompanying it with a smiley and a 'sorry couldn't resist' does not make it 'OK' in my book. This is a thread about the Co-op and therefore not really the place to attempt to correct how people write. 'Sue' could have PM'ed me and that would have been more appropriate.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blimey Liz, sorry you're having a bad day. Your "book" needs lightening up too, then.

Will we be able to tell it's you on the telly today by your growl?


But back to the Co-op. I like it and I don't care they don't speak good English.

They're polite and they work hard and they always try to be helpful and are always friendly when I ask them where stuff might be. (That's plural stuff, too!) Which is more than you can say for Sainsbury's sometimes.

I look forward to it's new gleamingness. This is a good thing and maybe they took notice of our previous posts.


So stop whining, all of yous. (That's plural.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a point of note here folks. The pronouns you use for collective nouns can be either singular or plural depending on context. If you are referring to a group of things acting as a unit to perform an action it is singular. If you are referring to a group of things but the individuals within that group are not all acting to one unique purpose then it is plural.


Anyhoo, grammar is a just tool that we use to bash language about with and I fully advocate fuking around with it a bit if it helps you get your point across or adds amusement value or beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was told by the new Manager that it was staying as the Co-op. It is being taken over by a new set of people and they're giving it a revamp. They said it is going to be stocked up a lot better than it was before. I really liked the Co-op and the people running it (regardless of whether or not they spoke English very well) have always been pleasant and friendly. The Co-op and the Turkish Shop further up the road have very friendly and likeable staff.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for that Clinker. I am glad to hear that the shop is staying a Co-op. They do a great range of Fairtrade foods, and some excellent wine deals. Agree with you that the Turkish shop is very friendly and their fruit is very reasonably priced. However, I wish places up that stretch did a range of organic stuff, just staples like milk and bread would be good. It's why I have to, unfortunately, rely on Tesco Express for a mid week shop.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:))Lizziedjango Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am afraid that accompanying it with a smiley and

> a 'sorry couldn't resist' does not make it 'OK' in

> my book. This is a thread about the Co-op and

> therefore not really the place to attempt to

> correct how people write. 'Sue' could have PM'ed.

> me and that would have been more appropriate.


xxxxxx


My name's Sue, not 'Sue', and coming back from a day out to read this has really brightened my day - rofl :))


I wasn't "attempting to correct how people write", I was making what I thought was a funny comment - sorry you took it so personally.


I have an MA in psychology, shall I analyse your response?


:)):))


Ooops sorry, perhaps I should have PMed you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grammatical tiffs aside, I've always really liked the lovely people at the Co-Op, even if their approach to stock checking seems a little like russian roulette (random, rather than murderous). Also, I don't know if anyone has been doing this, but until they closed for the refurb, I'd not really noticed how much I use the place. I keep wandering down there for milk and bread and then realising (again) that it's closed. It's like trying to get used to a missing limb. But much less traumatic of course. And hopefully, when I get my shiny new bionic arm... I mean, shop, this painful period will have been worth it.


PS - As a licence-fee payer, perhaps the BBC style guide needs an update so that it sounds more like, well, the english language as it is actually spoken?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The excitement builds.


A mailout from the good Co-Op folks has just landed on the doormat.

Promised: an 'award-winning new look'. A 'truly irresistible range'. A 'whole new shopping experience'. And ?2 off.


I hope so, because the old Co-Op sucked. Big time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's a new shopping experience? You go in and they tell you what you want? Or you go in and they pay you to take stuff? What's that about then?

Shopping's shopping.

When marketing types talk of shopping experience (like the over-used "solutions" word) I just wanna - indulge in retail therapy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The excitement builds.

>

> A mailout from the good Co-Op folks has just

> landed on the doormat.

> Promised: an 'award-winning new look'. A 'truly

> irresistible range'. A 'whole new shopping

> experience'. And ?2 off.

>

> I hope so, because the old Co-Op sucked. Big time.


Where's the award from? I bet I can resist the range.

And what does a 'whole new shopping experience', mean ?

I go in pick up some items (while sternly resisting some of course) and pay the the award winning staff.

Is it going to be dramatically different than that?

If it is please, please, please let it involve jet-packs, magnets and force fields.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was hoping for some more basic changes.


Not walking in to find dairy products lying around, waiting to be refrigerated? Again.

A shop layout which makes it possible for more than, say, a dozen people to be comfortably shopping / paying for their goods?

Fridges that work properly so that my milk isn't off the day after I get it home, which it has been on a few occasions?

The sale of garlic, limes, fresh herbs and other such 'exotic' produce?

Fixing the battered polystyrene ceiling with exposed wires a-dangling down?

Not to find the ice cream freezer cabinet empty with newspaper and cardboard stuffed in it to catch the drips? Again.

A basic selection of wines you might like to drink, as opposed to wash your windows with?


I can't wait to get in there brandishing my ?2 token.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...