Jump to content

Serious acciden at junction of Forest Hill Rd/Dunstans Rd now (Jan 5th 2016)


caz

Recommended Posts

If anyone needs to travel along Forest Hill Rd there has been a serious accident at the junction with Dunstans Rd. Police have taped off the junction and traffic is very backed up in both directions and traffic is unable to cross from Any direction. Very sad to say it looks like a really bad motorbike accident.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know what happened? I ask because it's such a dangerous section of road and wonder whether more complaints ought to be made to Southwark regarding the speed at which people hurtle down FHR.


I do hope everyone involved is okay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different accident. I live round the corner and only saw the police taped off area. I do hope all involved are okay.


I use this junction every day, mostly on bike but often in the car and personally don't find it any more precarious than others. Now that the crossing time for pedestrians seems to have been sorted its safer for them, traffic still travels in excess of the 20mph limit, perhaps more enforcement of that would be good. especially given the number of school children/park users that use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That junction used to be controlled by a pelian crossing that worked fine, then the bureaucrat know betters decided to install traffic lights, the result, long traffic delays and accidents. The sooner the lights are removed and the pelican crossing is re-instated the better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That junction used to be controlled by a pelian

> crossing that worked fine, then the bureaucrat

> know betters decided to install traffic lights,

> the result, long traffic delays and accidents. The

> sooner the lights are removed and the pelican

> crossing is re-instated the better.


I agree. A big difference before the lights were put in was that the road seemed narrower at the junction (I think I remember it being zebra crossings) so a good proportion of drivers would naturally slow down and go through cautiously and carefully. With the introduction of lights people tend to speed up instead to try and catch the green. Also, like you said, it was only after the change that the dreadful daily queues began.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kford is correct. I remember when they were installed, when there were water works going on. Why, if they were meant to be temporary, are they still there? I am sure someone with knowledge of bureaucracy knows which person to email. Can anyone help?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was discussed a while back - I will try and find the references for you (I posted about it on here, but there were some formal communications too) - Southwark Council, supported by the councillors for the relevant ward, decided to keep the lights for safety reasons and because it wasn't accepted they significantly adversely impacted traffic (so the positive safety reasons - particularly for pedestrians - outweighed the said-to-be small impact on traffic).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...