Jump to content

Trains just getting worse? What can we do?


James

Recommended Posts

Coming home from the theatre on Sunday I noticed there were only two trains per hour to Peckham Rye. I hope this is not an ongoing situation? When I first moved to East Dulwich there was a train to London Bridge every ten minutes on weekdays. Now there are only four per hour, badly spaced. What with no London Bridge-Charing Cross trains at the moment, my morning Thameslink service is overrun with people going to Elephant & Castle instead, to get straight onto the tube into the West End. The trains are often late and/or cancelled. The whole system is creaking under the strain, overcrowding is a daily occurrence... Does anyone know when any of this will get better? And why, while more and more people are using the trains from East Dulwich and Peckham, there seems to be no improvement whatsoever in frequency or capacity?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The growth in demand for travel from Peckham Rye has been huge over the last five or so years. Partly a result of the arrival of the London Overground, which has offset some of the increased demand - but I think more as a result of many more people choosing it as a station to commute from than previously. Either people travelling by other means; or just to the growth in incomers to Peckham.


The station itself can't cope at all. Most mornings now there is congestion getting into and out of the station and through the barriers in peak hours. Also in peak hours the situation on platforms three and four - where there are no station staff supervising at all, ever (presumably because they serve Thameslink and SE Trains and it's a Southern Trains run station - is verging on very dangerous, with overcrowded narrow platforms.


I hope the SE and Thameslink services will improve and get back to nearer to timetabled time when the London Bridge works are finished, but I suspect they probably won't. Hopefully again the move to bring in the suburban operators to TFL will have a positive effect on the number of trains serving the station - as there needs to be a greater increase in frequency of services to match the growth in demand.


Would also be good if, as well as all of the squabbling and delays over the square (or no square) in front of the station; some thought could be put into how to make the station itself function better as a station. New restaurants are great but they don't help people get to work. There's surely a case for creating a new entrance from Blenheim Grove or through the arches - especially to alleviate congestion on platforms three and four.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Peckham Rye and Denmark Hill get dangerously overcrowded. ED has seen very little change in capacity over the last decade or so (it went down from 6 tph to 4 and then back to 6), despite a huge increase in passenger numbers. Fundamentally, there needs to be higher frequency trains. As SE London develops and the population grows, the need to provide similiar transport to that which already exists in most other parts of inner London also increases.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Transport used to be good. I've been working in Moorgate for seven years. Until the work started at London Brisge, I was always on time for nursery pick up without rushing. Now, I really, really struggle and have to leave work at 4.50pm. Good thing husband now works from home. It's a real problem. Not sure what we can do. I tried to engage with Southern but it's like talking to a brick wall. I find them obstructive and objectionable. I remember reading that the service would soon be run by Transport for London. Could make things better ...or worse!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Transport used to be good. I've been working in

> Moorgate for seven years. Until the work started

> at London Brisge, I was always on time for nursery

> pick up without rushing. Now, I really, really

> struggle and have to leave work at 4.50pm. Good

> thing husband now works from home. It's a real

> problem. Not sure what we can do. I tried to

> engage with Southern but it's like talking to a

> brick wall. I find them obstructive and

> objectionable. I remember reading that the service

> would soon be run by Transport for London. Could

> make things better ...or worse!


You may have previously been on time, but without doing the fundamental work they are now doing at London Bridge, over the years your journey would have got progressively worse.


There is never a good time to do a major remodelling of a station and the approach tracks into it (which is the real problem currently), but in suffering this pain for the next few years a tonne of extra capacity can be released which is what we are all fundamentally asking for.


We just have to realise that these things take time to complete as every effort is made to keep the station functioning which temporarily reduces its capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

goosey-goosey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if the decision to route the Bakerloo

> line extension down the Old Kent Rd rather than

> PR/ED might, just might, see TfL and Network Rail

> release extra capacity on our severely congested,

> existing rail lines and maybe (re)open new lines.

> A direct service from PR to Charing Cross, anyone?


The much improved interchange at London Bridge should negate the need for a direct service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The lack of a direct rail link north to the West

> End lies at the very core of the area's transport

> problems. People either trundle up Walworth Rd or

> head east/west usng rail/tube links.


^this. We should have campaigned hard for a direct Charing Cross train before the works at London Bridge really got started. Think it's too late now. I'm hoping that there may be an increase in trains once TFL take over, but even if there is, it's likely to be fairly marginal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It shouldn't be too difficult to get into central London and indeed in the past it has been much easier. I don't need to get into the West End regularly, but living only 5 miles away, I think it's reasonable to expect the journey to take less than an hour minimum. Losing the link between London Bridge and Charing Cross is a bummer. The Thameslink is currently so unreliable as to be unusable imo. The number of trains from Denmark Hill to Victoria have reduced significantly. Add to this the increase in bus time travelling north, the reduction in reliability in trains from ED to London Bridge and massive increase in passenger numbers and it's all pretty poor. Saying 'live somewhere else' is not particularly helpful or constructive.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ED and Peckham are good for commuting to the city (putting the current temporary situation to one side). Other areas are good for the west end, but not so convenient for the city (e.g. Putney, Wandsworth). Just the way it is.


You can't expect every area of London to have a direct link into the west end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In fact, I have suggested some secure bike parking at Brixton and some more buses connecting to the tube there. This seems pretty modest to me and possibly more constructive than 'just move'.


More long term I do think there needs to be much bigger improvements in public transport as the population of London grows - and yes, a particular focus on SE London, which has very little in the way of high frequency services when compared to the rest of the Capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the LB to Charing X service is running it's not too bad. The change takes about five mins - the trains take a while to get to Charing X, but that's the same on that line wherever you start from.


In the meantime it's frustrating. I had to do it at the weekend and on my return journey I took the Circle/District Line from Embankment to Monument, walked across London Bridge, then got the train back to ED. It seemed quicker than any other way I have tried lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some things they could do that seem like quick, easy wins. But presumably there is no will to do it as operators are not incentivised to make things better - only to do the bare minimum under their contractual obligations.


One example would be reopening the abandoned East Brixton station on the London Overground, giving us a direct link to Brixton and interchange with the tube there. This seems blindingly obvious and nowhere near as costly as building an interchange at the actual tube station. Why are they not doing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those seeking a direct train line from ED to Charing Cross, I'm no engineer but there would be huge logistical problems. The line from ED joins the lines from Kent and other places in SE London at Southwark Park Road. ED trains get in at London Bridge at platform 14/15, the line that carries trains to Charing Cross from London Bridge commences at platform 6. So tracks would have to be built with points changes to bring trains from platform 14 to platform 6 on the length of track from Southwark Bridge Road to London Bridge. Possible I guess but it would affect the running of all trains from Kent, rest of SE London and ED line. Could only result in fewer trains all round and more delays.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In fact, I have suggested some secure bike parking

> at Brixton and some more buses connecting to the

> tube there. This seems pretty modest to me and

> possibly more constructive than 'just move'.


If that's aimed at me, you must have misunderstood.


Someone else said that the lack of a direct west end link was the core problem. I disagree - and I repeat - it's not realistic to expect every area to have a direct link into the west end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are some things they could do that seem like

> quick, easy wins. But presumably there is no will

> to do it as operators are not incentivised to make

> things better - only to do the bare minimum under

> their contractual obligations.

>

> One example would be reopening the abandoned East

> Brixton station on the London Overground, giving

> us a direct link to Brixton and interchange with

> the tube there. This seems blindingly obvious and

> nowhere near as costly as building an interchange

> at the actual tube station. Why are they not doing

> it?


I was going to say something similar. The lack of an interchange between the ginger line and Brixton tube seems ridiculous to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A repetitive tried and tested cycle that seems to be slowing down in London thankfully. Brixton was the start. Councils consciously and purposely let an area decline until that area is next on the list for social and ethnic cleansing and ultimately gentrification. In come the first wave of arty/ creatives to squat and house share. A few coffee shops and cool but inexpensive cafe/ bars and art spaces open up. The crackheads, dealers and other assorted criminals who were once left to operate openly and brazenly to sell, shop lift, mug, beg, purchase,  publicly consume on decent folks doorsteps, stairwells,in bin sheds and without fear of the law begin to be targeted, rounded up and moved on. A few more jaunty and sustainable coffee shops/ bars appear . The Guardian and other facilitators in the media jump on the bandwagon, first claims of vibrancy are rolled out. Next step a few cool retro clothing shops pop up selling ' reclaimed Levi's for more than they originally cost and ten times the price of what the recently departed charity shop charged. Foxtons open a branch and the arty types and first wavers/ drivers have there first moan about there initially paltry rents going up. The guardian do a generic lets move to Brixton, Dalston, Hackney, Deptford, Walthamstow type double pager. Interview a graphic designer or two who have just bought a former crack den on the manor for next to peanuts. They will later bemoan the next wave who have more money than them. Cool, edgy and vibrant are now the buzzword bingo must use lingo. Few more coffee shops ( how original ) Pop up everything,. Organic and sour dough move in. The night time economy starts to thrive, more cool bars and eateries open. More squats and the last crack house that was once one of many are cleared out. Second wave is around the corner.   All of a sudden there's a visible police presence again and the streets are safe for fun seekers with plenty of disposable cash to chuck about on a dose of vibrancy with added coolness. By this stage even the locally brewed beer is organic. There's queues outside the newly arrived organic, sourdough, artisan and sustainable bakers. Instagram has Brixton trending. The greasy spoon of thirty year has gone cause the lease is up and the landlord has hiked the rents up by 60/70%. Followed by small family run independents that served the community  for decades and more.  The local characters, activists, eccentrics are getting less and less. There's a new show in town for a week or two and until the next brand arrives. Brewdog move in. Former job centres are converted into bars but peak edginess means it's still called the job centre. Followed by a couple more chain eateries. The resident DJ'S and music venues are replaced by another generic brand boasting guest chefs. The Guardian lifestyle section is now on it's fifth or sixth orgasm. Turn a few pages and hypocrisy is rampant with articles on the evils of gentrification, foxtons, capitalism, social cleansing and unaffordable housing. The middle classes continue to arrive in there droves to buy into the vibrancy and multiculturalism supposedly on offer. There isn't much multiculturalism going on at the packed latest place to eat, drink and fart. The multiculturalism on show comes in the form of bar staff, doorman and cheap as chips uber drivers and delivery workers. Rice and peas, jerk everything, red stripe at six quid a can from some hipster haunt that is currently flavour of the month and the place to be seen. The first wavers are now blaming the latest hedge funded brand that's pulled into town for driving gentrification and there soon to be hastened departure to be first wavers again somewhere else. Less cool but up and coming here we come. Covid has certainly helped/ been a factor in slowing down the process of gentrification. I also think it may be the driver for almost putting a stop to it. Remote working, less need to move to London to be near an office, less disposable cash, sky high rents, worthless degrees that relied on that disposable cash , different priorities, knife and gang crime and a large dose of much needed realism has put a huge spanner in the works for the shitty process and cycle that is/ was the gentrification and social cleansing of working class London. Manchester and Liverpool is next on the list for the planners. Thankfully.
    • Can you just queue up to withdraw cash or are other transactions like stamp purchasing required?  Do M&S do cash back?
    • Or don't stop using cash. Stop using your phone or even your watch as a banknote. At the same time avoid the risk of having your card cloned at cash points, by hand held card readers, oyster readers and point-of sale terminals to name a few. God only knows how much damage we're doing to the planet because all the above must require a hell of a lot of resources and juice from the grid. It won't happen though. I know of quite a few people who deem carrying cash about as a pain/ chore. But not a big lump of plastic with a screen and full of personal information that can be easily gleamed. I feel the same about carrying a phone about so i don't most of the time. I'll be in the minority but certainly don't see or treat a phone as a necessity.  You can't get a banknote out of your sky rocket with a phone in your hand. It's become a source of dopamine for many. It's an addiction for many. They're an easy target for thieves. They're a godsend to cyber fraudsters who are stealing billions and are doing so without the need of cash points.
    • There used to be an Osteopath at The Gardens (not physio) but they have since left.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...