Jump to content

Heathrow - 3rd runway consultation - closes 25 May


Recommended Posts

If, like me, the constant plane noise in East Dulwich affects you negatively, please respond to the consultation about the 3rd runway and airspace policy - links below. Deadline is 25 May.


In the 15 years I have lived in East Dulwich, the plane noise has gone from minimal to loud and constant, as planes fly lower and in tighter flight path routes. This means that East Dulwich is constantly flown over - when the winds are westerly, we get the Heathrow planes and, when the wind is easterly, we get the City Airport planes (which are set to increase following Sadiq Khan giving permission to City airport to expand significantly).


If the flight noise doesn't bother you, please don't respond to this thread - just be grateful they don't affect your health/ wellbeing 😀


For more information about which flights are overflying us, see www.flightradar24.com


For more information about the consultation, see Hacan's website: www.hacan.org.uk


Consultation document can be found at either of the links below:


https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/589082/consultation-on-draft-airports-nps.pdf


www.gov.uk/dft/heathrow-airport-expansion


Responses can be made via the weblink below or to the email address below:


www.gov.uk/dft/heathrow-airport-expansion


Email: [email protected]


Thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for this - deadline is 25th May.


Whilst I think most people would have enough information to respond, bear in mind that the DfT can't provide all the info. From the website:


"We are currently unable to publish this information due to restrictions in place during the pre-election period"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is clearly not true. I see car drivers breaking the law on hourly basis - jumping red lights, speeding, not obeying the general rules. Plus they  are operating considerably more dangerous machinery and should have a greater responsibility of care to other road uses. You can see who causes the most harm by the stats. 
    • Looking for a suit for an 11 year old. Quite specific, white with black thin stripes.  Trying to replicate Michael Jacksons smooth criminal costume.  A blue linen shirt and white tie.    Thank you !!!!!!!
    • A quick Google found this, amongst other things: "Social impact models are frameworks or approaches that guide how organizations or initiatives address social or environmental problems."
    • "If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck then it must be a duck" comes to mind Unfortunately, a large number of cyclists do exhibit selfish amd anti social behaviour which, regardless of how many good cyclists there are, is seen as the norm.  It's a bit like one car driver jumping a red light and all car drivers getting tarred by the same brush. Perception is the issue and if cyclists all obeyed the rules, everyone would be less anti them but unfortunately that isn't the case 🤔
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...