Jump to content

Warning - dog poisoning risk in Nunhead cemetery


Recommended Posts

My dog nearly died this weekend.


A week or so ago, she was badly sick after eating something on the compost heap at the top of the hill in the cemetery. On Friday she did it again (I couldn't stop her in time). This time, 24 hours later she was in animal hospital in danger of her life having vomited blood. She has been incredibly weak and on a drip, but thankfully as of this morning is looking like recovering.


I told the vet what happened and she said they had had SIX other dogs in THIS WEEKEND with the same symptoms who ALSO walked their dog in the cemetery. There are surely many other vets in the area experiencing similar intakes.


I can't say for certain the compost pile is the cause, but it does strongly seem like there is something amiss in that cemetery. The 'compost heap' I refer to is just down the hill from the bench at the top that has the view of St Paul's


Our vet is calling the cemetery and the council. I have emailed Friends of Nunhead Cemetery. Please take note and warn other dog walkers until this is resolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just had this back from Friends of Nunhead Cemetery:


I think that you may be referring to the bark mulch pile on the West Hill

path which has been placed there by Southwark Council's contractors on site.

I am not aware of any compost heaps as such on site. As you say, however,

there may be another cause for your dog's illness as certain plants or other

materials may be responsible. It is even possible that the cause lays

outwith the cemetery boundaries. It would perhaps be helpful for the Council

to know which vet has reported similar instances of sickness.


I am copying this response to the appropriate borough officer to investigate

further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tweeted Southwark council about this earlier, this is what they said:


We don't believe the small composting area to be the cause of the problem but we will be removing this material as soon as possible 1/2


2/2 The responsibility for the care and associated health of dogs remains with their owners.



Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bark mulch would be a likely growing medium for fungi. Depending on the size of your dog a relatively small amount which might not be too harmful to human adults could well be so to a small dog. Fungi can often look (and indeed, to a dog) smell attractive. Truffles are hunted out by dogs. Outwith the intentional placing of poison, the advice - 'it's your responsibility' - seems fair.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Multiple instances of very severe illness are reported among dog walkers and owners on Peckham Rye. The common factor is always a visit to Nunhead Cemetery.


"Outwith" (Penguin68 is evidently Scots), that is to say, excluding "the intentional placing of poison." Well, do not exclude this possibility. Just in practical terms, consider the mechanism most capable of affecting scores of dogs: fungi from one small compost heap, or toxic material being calculatedly distributed along paths there? Dogs will sometimes consume fungi it is true, but they are generally very cautious dining at nature's 'salad bar'. What they do wolf down without hesitation is scraps of junk food - which would be an extremely effective bait.


"Fair" certainly does not properly describe Southwark's pronouncement that "It's your responsibility". This 3-word raspberry is actually a very partial, self-serving and complacent claim by a local authority which has allowed itself, once again, to waste considerable time, effort and (our) money pursuing yet another pointless and dishonest jihad against dogs and their owners.


And what of those preposterous attempts by leading figures in the Friends Of Nunhead Cemetery to prevent dog walking there? This has been very widely witnessed and discussed by local owners and walkers.


Is it possible - just as Brexit 'gives permission' for racist attacks - that these dismal municipal shennanigans could conceivably enourage some sick or vicious person to set poison?


Southwark's words are not even consistent with their actions: if the compost is not the problem, why are they removing it?


The claim is that weedkiller isn't used at Nunhead Cemetery. Well, maybe. One local vet has had to give up urban beekeeping after her hives (located in Peckham) were totally annihilated by a Southwark contractor merrily spraying pesticide. So who knows?


Myself, I would find two sorts of further posts very helpful:


- Specific reports of canine illness and poisoning, and vets' reported comments.


- From a toxicologist or vet, the symptoms of different kinds of poisoning in dogs: from fungi, pesticides, warfarin, etc etc.



Lee Scoresby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A slightly overblown analysis there from Lee Scoresby but I can't disagree. This sounds highly suspect to me. Yes, Southwark Council, of course dog owners are ultimately responsible for their pets but if hazardous/toxic materials are lying around in public areas, it's cause for concern for more than just dog owners.


If the answer is more sinister then it needs to be investigated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree or not, edcam, spare us the each-way punt. Shying away from saying it out loud and straight - and getting angry about it - has brought this country, at all levels, to its present ludicrous, toxic, disfunctional state of public administration.


SouthwarkLovesDogs (www.southwarklovesdogs.org) has now raised the funds to test this illness. Results will be made known on social media.


Generally, please be aware of this great self-organised citizens' defence group and consider supporting it practically ([email protected]). One might think that we should not need defending against 'our own' local authority. One might think that local authority could bestir itself to conduct this forensic analysis itself. "Overblown"?


Meanwhile, the poisoner wins, no? We are all keeping our pets way from NC. Cui bono? (Or THINKS they benefit.)


LS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You can request for them to come and collect your full bins again https://forms.southwark.gov.uk/ShowForm.asp?fm_fid=1879 They usually come on whatever day your rubbish/recycling collection day is. If you aren't going to be in, leave them somewhere that they can find it. If you don't need replacements, just leave a note on the full ones that a replacement isn't needed.  They usually come quite early, so it's better to leave them outside if you can. 
    • Just wondering- what were they arrested for? If you remember 
    • Cyclists certainly do have a bit of a perception problem at the moment and when I cycle I see a lot of examples of arrogance and ignorance that gives all cyclists a bad name - it does seem that many cyclists have caught the entitlement bug many drivers seem to have.
    • But Spartacus didn't mention the significant amounts of land being used for car storage - that was most definitely you.   And I am afraid when you apply your same measure to other transport uses (like cycleways and cycle lanes - Malumbu is your stat on the 360 kms of cycle network cycleways or cycle lanes?) then it most definitely is relevant for the debate.   Should we assume then that if all this ULEZ money and government bailout money is being poured into TFL then the system is, financially at least, broken or is it a case that the money is being mis-spent (like the DV junction project)?    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...