Jump to content

Change of ward name


kibris

Recommended Posts

kibris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How do people feel with the change of ward name in

> May from East Dulwich Ward to Goose Green Ward and

> what will happen to the price of property



It has never made sense to call it East Dulwich Ward when there are other wards within East Dulwich.


The name change won't have any effect whatever on the price of property :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that there are some other new ward areas and changes of name that affect SE21/22.


Dulwich Wood replaces College.

Dulwich Village replaces Village.

Dulwich Hill and Goose Green replaces part of Peckham Rye and East Dulwich with a tiny part of College.

Champion Hill replaces South Camberwell.

Peckham Rye will only cover the side of SE22 on the other side of Forest Hill Road, i.e Therapia Road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

House prices in East Dulwich often comes down to Individual roads.


Properties on Fellbrigg, Ulverscroft, Nutfield and Archdale were once very south after.


I believe the Market, M&S and other Lordship Lane outlets have increased traffic using these roads to park in.


This alone makes these roads less favourable. Prices will be on the decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on the road called Peckham Rye but not on the SE22 side which is nuts that they are calling one of the wards Peckham Rye Ward. And as for affecting house prices why on earth would it affect them? Do YOU care what ward you are in (and what they are called) when you move?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> House prices in East Dulwich often comes down to

> Individual roads.

>

> Properties on Fellbrigg, Ulverscroft, Nutfield and

> Archdale were once very south after.

>

> I believe the Market, M&S and other Lordship Lane

> outlets have increased traffic using these roads

> to park in.

>

> This alone makes these roads less favourable.

> Prices will be on the decline.



Evidence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, I think actually Fellbrigg, Ulverscroft,

> Nutfield and Archdale are more sort of the ghetto

> of the ED.

> Crystal Palace Rd, now THAT is well sought after !



Especially the bit just up from the Whateley Road junction, eh?


:))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe this is just a change of ward name but also of ward boundaries. So it is not just College becomes Dulwich Wood, as some of College becomes Dulwich Hill (eh, what's that when it's at home?) And 'East Dulwich' is not entirely contiguous with Goose Green which does replace much of it. I can't find an up to date map, but attached is a link to the proposal map.


https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/5979

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dulwich Hill is the old name for Denmark Hill and that sort of area. I.e. between Dulwich and Camberwell. So the new Dulwich Hill seems to be Barry Road area which doesn't seem right historically or geographically, or anything really. Lordship or Barry would be better.


Village Ward used to be called Ruskin I'm sure. Can't remember the others. What they really need to get on with is changing the Parliamentary boundaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed this out to the Electoral Commission but they weren't interested. We even suggested that Dulwich Hills would be better than Dulwich Hill if they were totally wedded to this.


I suggested College ward name be changed as it seemed bizarre in this age to name a political ward after a private school that the majority of residents had no association with.


The good this is the Goose Green ward and the Dulwich Hill ward are clos to 100% of the East Dulwich area.


EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich Hill is the old name for Denmark Hill and

> that sort of area. I.e. between Dulwich and

> Camberwell. So the new Dulwich Hill seems to be

> Barry Road area which doesn't seem right

> historically or geographically, or anything

> really. Lordship or Barry would be better.

>

> Village Ward used to be called Ruskin I'm sure.

> Can't remember the others. What they really need

> to get on with is changing the Parliamentary

> boundaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EDOldie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich Hill is the old name for Denmark Hill and

> that sort of area. I.e. between Dulwich and

> Camberwell. So the new Dulwich Hill seems to be

> Barry Road area which doesn't seem right

> historically or geographically, or anything

> really. Lordship or Barry would be better.

>

> Village Ward used to be called Ruskin I'm sure.

> Can't remember the others. What they really need

> to get on with is changing the Parliamentary

> boundaries.


They?re doing that too. In the latest (final consultation now closed) iteration ?south Southwark? is lumped in with parts of Lewisham. I don?t think it makes any sense and the new system means - in theory at least - that we get new boundaries at every single General Election. The latest legislation results in a jigsaw puzzle that will fit constituencies around the numbers rather than any attempt to achieve local representation based on established communities.


Anyway the wards in the old Dulwich seat were:

The Lane

Bellenden

Waverley

Lyndhurst

Alleyn

Rye

Ruskin

College

...and Barset in Nunhead which was removed to Peckham from the 1983 election onwards.


The new Goose Green ward is not a million miles away from the old Bellenden ward in that it traverses East Dulwich Road. It would have been wrong to have retained the East Dulwich name as the ward encompasses parts of SE15 as well as SE22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I pointed this out to the Electoral Commission but

> they weren't interested. We even suggested that

> Dulwich Hills would be better than Dulwich Hill if

> they were totally wedded to this.

>

> I suggested College ward name be changed as it

> seemed bizarre in this age to name a political

> ward after a private school that the majority of

> residents had no association with.

>

> The good this is the Goose Green ward and the

> Dulwich Hill ward are clos to 100% of the East

> Dulwich area.

>

Well I?m by the East Dulwich estate in the middle of what would be Champion Hill. How are we not ?the East Dulwich area??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

College is largely the same area as before, however it loses the area surrounding Dawson's Heights to Dulwich Hill.


The Dulwich Wood boundary will be the Lordship Lane Estate, crossing over to Melford Road and then along Wood Vale towards Lordship Lane.


So most of Underhill Road will be in Dulwich Hill, with the section between Melford and LL in Dulwich Wood as now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Northeastview Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But there is a Champion hill estate already. What

> was East Dulwich eastates previous name?


Not sure what your point is but since you asked, see http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/southwark/assets/galleries/camberwell/glebe-house East Dulwich estate was built much later than the rest of East Dulwich.


ETA If I was living there, I?d rather like to live in a ward called Champion Hill, reflecting a more historic heritage, just as I?m happy my own ward is changing to Goose Green from the parvenu East Dulwich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The map is interactive and can show the current and revised wards



Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't believe this is just a change of ward name

> but also of ward boundaries. So it is not just

> College becomes Dulwich Wood, as some of College

> becomes Dulwich Hill (eh, what's that when it's at

> home?) And 'East Dulwich' is not entirely

> contiguous with Goose Green which does replace

> much of it. I can't find an up to date map, but

> attached is a link to the proposal map.

>

> https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/5979

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Northeastview Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But there is a Champion hill estate already.

> What

> > was East Dulwich eastates previous name?

>

> Not sure what your point is but since you asked,

> see

> http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/southwark/assets/gal

> leries/camberwell/glebe-house East Dulwich estate

> was built much later than the rest of East

> Dulwich.

>

> ETA If I was living there, I?d rather like to live

> in a ward called Champion Hill, reflecting a more

> historic heritage, just as I?m happy my own ward

> is changing to Goose Green from the parvenu East

> Dulwich.

I was just wondering why it?s called East Dulwich estate if it has never been part of East Dulwich. Calling the area Champion Hill makes no difference at all. Everyone I know living here calls it Camberwell on the north side of the lights at Dog Kennel Hill School, and East Dulwich on the south, probably because that is where the postcode changes from SE5 to SE22 (though maybe only on th right side of the road?). It?s just interesting to hear what the background is, and the thoughts of those outside looking in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The map is interactive and can show the current and revised wards


Indeed - but the words used to describe it are 'final proposals' and final recommendations (in a link). As I read it this words do not mean (but maybe are intended to?) - 'final agreed changes'. I'm assuming, from what James B says, that that is what they are (the final deal) but the words don't quite say that. Hence me saying 'I can't find an up to date link' which clearly states these are the wards for and from the 2018 London elections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We are a local architectural practice based in East Dulwich, offering a full suite of services including design, planning permission, interior design, and project management. Our projects span residential, retail, and commercial sectors throughout the city. With over 12 years of professional experience, we possess deep expertise in planning, design, and construction, including work on Grade II listed buildings and in Conservation Areas. Get in touch if you have a project in mind and we would be happy to discuss.  Email: [email protected] Phone: 0790 843 8040 (William) Leaflet-A4.pdf Phone Number: 07908 438040 Email Address: [email protected] Website: http://www.studiohei.com View full listing
    • Hi Everyone   My aunt had a horrible fall at East Dulwich station last Thursday on 11th April.  She has suffered significant injuries and was helped by 2 kind passers by whom we would really like to thank. We also want to know if anyone saw her fall/ knows what happened as my aunt cannot recall and it would be useful for her family to know in terms of future planning.  If you are or know the passers by who assisted, called paramedics and comforted her, please do reach out - we would love to thank you.  Equally, if you happened to be there or see what happened please message and let me know.   Thanks
    • what is the status of your company? is it formally closed, yet the bank account is open? How are you planning on extracting the funds from the company account?  Do you have your emails from a personal email account? Is there any indication that it is a business sale, other than a business bank account - did you tell them it was a business bank account - does the bank account you gave them have a different name?   
    • Can anyone help / offer advice, please? I just sold a fairly rare and quite valuable vintage knitting machine and accessories to a business as a private sale to a business. It's run a couple who specialise in repairing and reselling secondhand knitting machine parts. I tested the machine and accessory prior to selling and both were working. The business has just texted me with a fairly aggressive message to say 'it can't be working as part of it is missing' and that the pattern reading accessory does not work. I know that both parts were working when I handed them over, so it is just their word against mine. (I haven't replied to ask what part is missing yet) When they arrived to pick up, the owner said he needed to do 'due diligence' ie to open the case of the machine and check it was all there. He did all that and did not mention anything was missing at that point. They paid by bank transfer on pickup. Unfortunately for me, I got them to pay into my business ac (even though I no longer run a business and am retired, I still have the account) and now they say because they paid to a business ac they can dispute the payment. I did get them to sign a delivery note with a list of items that they were buying  but I did not specify 'bought as seen' on the note. How does it work when it's one person's word against another? I originally found the business online and emailed them with the details and photos. They had good reviews for selling items (but no reviews re: buying items) The owner always replied by phone rather than email so although I have notes of our conversations I do not have anything in writing from him. I'm feeling angry at having trusted them and also upset - textile design was my career before I retired and I wish I'd just given the machine to a charity now1 Any helpful advice much appreciated!  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...