Jump to content

Roadworks top of Lordship Lane


Recommended Posts

Hi

Does anyone know how long these works are scheduled to last? It?s causing chaos getting to denmark hill (and forest hill is still only being served by the 185). I know I could walk but I have a time constraint meaning I can?t leave home until a particular time.

Thanks v much!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just can't understand why these works weren't all packaged together with the last 3 times they set up temporary lights and closed the bus stop in the last 6 months. The cost savings would have been enormous not to mention the reduction in total chaos. And yet still the dilapidated section of road between GG and EDG remains untouched in an island-like state with every adjoining road now repaved. The people managing these works must be about the most incompetent of their kind in existence.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least the roadworks at Goose Green will be complete on Friday. However, Dartmouth Road in Forest Hill has been closed since Jan 29th with only tarmac needing to be laid before it can reopen.


It was supposed to reopen tomorrow (Apr 19), but has been put back week after week when it was supposed to reopen in March. A farcical situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguinpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Personally I?d say the top is the end which is

> further north? Goose green is at the north end of

> LL. What reason would you put for it being

> ?bottom??



I've always thought of the roundabout end as being the "bottom" end, too! Possibly because it's at the bottom of a hill.


I took one look at the traffic situation yesterday and completely changed my (public transport) travel plans into town. I feel really sorry for anybody who doesn't have an alternative route they can take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mikeb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Between the roadworks on Lordship Lane and at the

> top of Grove Lane, it's taking about 30 minutes to

> get a bus for the 1 mile trip to Denmark Hill.

> Maddening.


While I appreciate it?s not possible for everyone, if it?s really taking 30 minutes, able-bodied people without luggage would surely be better walking. Even with the hill, it would take less than 30 mins for most. However, with luggage tomorrow, I will allow for extra time. Thanks for the warning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree on walking, pre children I walked to D Hill every weekday for years, from south of the main LL shops. 25 mins. Now i have exactly 20 minutes from childcare arriving to getting the train and the bus has been fine until now! Hopefully next week it?s back to normal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Goose Green roundabout is at the 'bottom' of Dog Kennel Hill (and Grove Vale) - but at the 'top' of Lordship Lane. Not only does Lordship Lane head due south from Goose Green (so it's at the top of a map normally oriented with North at the top) but it's at the start of a road which leads away from Central London - again going out of town south of the river is often seen as heading 'down' - when going in to Town is going 'up to town' (from wherever you are). So saying the roundabout is 'at the top' of Lordship lane seems eminently logical, if you are using LL as the determinant. Using DKH or Grove Vale as the determinant would of course make it 'bottom of'.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Goose Green roundabout is at the 'bottom' of

> Dog Kennel Hill (and Grove Vale) - but at the

> 'top' of Lordship Lane. Not only does Lordship

> Lane head due south from Goose Green (so it's at

> the top of a map normally oriented with North at

> the top) but it's at the start of a road which

> leads away from Central London - again going out

> of town south of the river is often seen as

> heading 'down' - when going in to Town is going

> 'up to town' (from wherever you are). So saying

> the roundabout is 'at the top' of Lordship lane

> seems eminently logical, if you are using LL as

> the determinant. Using DKH or Grove Vale as the

> determinant would of course make it 'bottom of'.


That was worth waiting for... not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bringing the thread back to it's original topic/ purpose, the extended yellow lines in my immediate area have taken around x4 car spaces from each road and the bike 'bunkers' an additional x1 space. With parking becoming a bit of an issue for various reasons I personally dont find a benefit to the extended lines (where we are the old spacing at junctions was sufficient to avoid safety problems in my opinion). Hope that helps give you one persons perspective.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just tried to navigate my way in the car to Bromley via LL, what chaos. I waited for 15 minutes to get from one side of PR park to the plough via EDR. I gave up and came home. Before the regular moaners get involved, I tried two separate routes both of which were unacceptably congested. I am have now abandoned my plans for the day, and will be forcing myself to jump a train tomorrow instead. Not at all happy.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to stray off-topic momentarily, if you think that's bad, you need to experience the chaos all around Victoria, Buckingham Palace, the parks, down to Whitehall, etc, due to this Commonwealth Heads of Government event. Roads not just closed to traffic but also pedestrians, compounded by stewards employed with absolutely no knowledge of London streets and therefore unable to inform you of alternative routes. Been such a nightmare this past three days that I'm seriously thinking of giving it a miss today. It's on until next Tuesday apparently. Should be even greater fun when combined with the Marathon this Sunday!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FightingFit Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Penguin68 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Goose Green roundabout is at the 'bottom'

> of

> > Dog Kennel Hill (and Grove Vale) - but at the

> > 'top' of Lordship Lane. Not only does Lordship

> > Lane head due south from Goose Green (so it's

> at

> > the top of a map normally oriented with North

> at

> > the top) but it's at the start of a road which

> > leads away from Central London - again going

> out

> > of town south of the river is often seen as

> > heading 'down' - when going in to Town is going

> > 'up to town' (from wherever you are). So saying

> > the roundabout is 'at the top' of Lordship lane

> > seems eminently logical, if you are using LL as

> > the determinant. Using DKH or Grove Vale as the

> > determinant would of course make it 'bottom

> of'.

>

> That was worth waiting for... not.


I thought it was an interesting and lucid explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There are genuine risks for engineers working on cell towers, I believe, but the microwave effects attenuate very swiftly with distance meaning that those consumers, and residents, served by the towers are effectively risk free. The worst impact is aesthetic rather than medical, and the communications and computing etc. benefits offered by 5G tend to mitigate these for most people who have and use mobile telephony. Considering what else is out there in our built environment I personally don't think aesthetic objections trump the utility of better communications infrastructure. 
    • I think the concern is the mast being so close to a school as well?
    • There is a planning application to put a mobile phone mast at the top of Dog Kennel Hill.  Residents of Camberwell Grove and their friends in the Camberwell Society are fighting it - defacing their nice conservation area with ugly laminated posters!  They do not benefit from it as reception is fine on their side of the hill. https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=S9IKT2KBN1200 I do not think there are any health hazards from being near phone masts (or at least they are negligible relative to everyday risks we all face).  Anyway, here is what the NHS has to say about them: https://111.wales.nhs.uk/encyclopaedia/m/article/mobilephonesafety/#Risks I imagine this will spark some lively debate!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...