Jump to content

Southwark major works


Recommended Posts

Hi - has anyone received a final bill yet for the major works completed in 2016? Also is anyone aware of any one raising a legal challenge to the amounts paid? The works to my property included painting and some pointing and I've so far been charged an estimated cost of ?18,000! Thanks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As well as work directly on your flat you might expect to share the costs of (a) scaffolding to work on the property (b) work on common parts shared by different establishments © work on electrical or plumbing services from which you take a shared benefit and (d) work on roofs even where you are not on the top floor - so more than just work on the fabric that you lease. However you should get what itemisation you can - if you are being asked to share costs on work which was exclusively undertaken on other properties (i.e. not common or shared elements) you may have a case, as you would if works charged for weren't in fact undertaken, of if charges for specific works were disproportionate as regards the scale, scope or quality of the work undertaken. Even now that the council and councillors are all of the same party you should still expect support from your local councillor if you feel that the charges are unfair or wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Council tenants have no financial 'interest' in the property (i.e. cannot benefit from increases in value - putting aside the whole 'right to buy' issue) - that interest (in preserving the value of the property through repair and refurbishment) sits with the council (or housing association) for tenanted properties - they will need to demonstrate that the overall cost of the works is being shared equitably between leaseholders and the landlord for non-leasehold properties. There should be no cross-subsidy - although clearly council tenants, who can take no fiscal benefit from the works, cannot be expected either to pay for them. Any possible cross subsidy would be between leaseholders and the council for non-leasehold properties. How the council recoups their costs for non-leasehold properties is up to them - either through rents or local taxes (or through selling some capital assets to pay for the upkeep of others).


Capital works (repair or refurbishment) either preserve or improve the value of property - those without a stake in that value (i.e. council tenants) are, it seems to me, more reasonably excused the costs of these, even where they benefit from living in a 'better' environment. The same would be true of private tenants benefiting from such works undertaken by a private landlord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi


I can't help but I do remember a number of threads on the forum about this over the years, many in the same position as yourself. As an example (with some potentially helpful contact details) see here: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1555979,page=1


I do remember another thread about someone who had asked for an itemized invoice and through this was able to show she was being charged for communal works which were never carried out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi lordship girl,

Do challenge. Perhaps worth joining seeking advice from http://www.las2000.org Leaseholders Associate of southwark who are well versed in fighting such bills.


Also perhaps worth noting. Around 30 houses in East Dulwich the council own the freehold but both flats are leasehold. I'm always amazed those leaseholders have followed the leaseholder enfranchisement and bought the freehold form the council - as i the leaseholders right. If this is you then you can calculate what the cost of doing this would be via one of many online calculators - https://www.freeholdcalculator.com/freehold_choose.php this is the first ot pop up in a Google search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are also still awaiting our final bill from 2016.

I had so many issues with saltash, but got their attention pretty quickly when I emailed Southwark council CEO and cc?d in Helen Hayes together with saltash contact and any council contacts we had met along the way.


3 lots of scaffolding on same area where pointing was missed, I?ve really put them through the ringer, not let them get away with anything, workmanship is shoddy to say the least.


I?m paying on DD so I?m not yet at a point that I have paid them more than I assume the work should have cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hmmm, millions of animals are killed each year to eat in this country.  10,000 animals (maybe many more) reared to be eaten by exotic pets, dissected by students, experimented on by cosmetic and medical companies.  Why is this any different? Unless you have a vegan lifestyle most of us aren't in a position to judge.  I've not eaten meat for years, try not to buy leather and other animal products as much as possible but don't read every label, and have to live with the fact that for every female chick bred to (unaturally) lay eggs for me to eat, there will be male that is likely top be slaughtered, ditto for the cow/milk machines - again unnatural. I wasn't aware that there was this sort of market, but there must be a demand for it and doubt if it is breaking any sort of law. Happy to be proved wrong on anything and everything.
    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...