Jump to content

Men pretending to be gardeners/tree surgeons...


Dis

Recommended Posts

I?ve just spoken to my neighbour, a woman in her eighties who lives on her own in Kirkdale. A gardening company had put a business card through her letterbox, so she called them and asked them to visit and quote to trim a tree in her garden. 2 guys arrived and told her that the tree needed to be cut down (which it didn?t) and refused to tell her how much it would cost. Despite her protestations, they became aggressive and cut a few branches off the tree then asked her for ?2100. She was terrified - they made her go to the bank and withdraw the cash and give it to them. Now we all can see that there were opportunities for her to call the police, but she was too afraid and just wanted them to go. Obviously she called the police once they had gone, but they are not confident that there will be much they can do.

So be warned. Ignore business cards that come through your letterbox. And watch out for these scumbag thieves.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking money out of a bank with menaces is the same as robbery (effectively once I was forced to give my pin up once - the police can't do anything but the bank can). It's a crime and the bank WILL reimburse surely.


Edit: What I mean is there was no way she authorised the transaction - she let it happen because they were with her threatening her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please alert the bank to what looks like a failure in their procedures: most (all?) now say they are aware of these issues and check carefully before authorising the withdrawal of large amounts of cash by older customers, checking with relatives etc if suspicious. Hope the lady's recovering from such an unpleasant experience and that they catch these [redacted] soon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dis, are you able to give us the name or phone number on the flyer? My mum is looking for someone to do some work on the tree in her garden and recently had a (very genuine looking) flyer through the door from someone claiming to be a tree surgeon. I don't want her to suffer the same horrible treatment as your neighbour.


Also I found this news story which doesn't encourage me but at least these ones were caught.

http://www.bromley.gov.uk/press/article/1252/rogue_traders_sentenced_following_gardening_and_tree_work


Thanks

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gosh how dreadful. There were some blokes hanging out in a van outside my house a while back - seemed dodgy so I went out to ask them if they needed some help. They said they were tree surgeons and as it happened we needed a tree taking out so i asked for a price and he gave a price I was ok with. Then he pressed me to get the cash out on the spot, i said no it wasn't a good time but could do the next week. Then he refused to give me his number and said he'd put a card through the door which he never did... I thought it was odd at the time as I'd have been happy to pay, and had them down for fraudsters. Wonder if it's the same chaps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive replied via private message, because it may be possible that these cowboys are printing flyers that use a legitimate company's name, but they are changing the phone numbers for their own. This way, if you go to the website you see a perfectly good company, who may be professional and completely honest.. But of you call the mobile number you get through to a scumbag who has nothing to do with the real company.

I don't want to publicly accuse a company of malpractice, because it may actually have nothing to do with them.

What i will say is that the mobile number on the flyer ended with 8864..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...