Jump to content

Rye Lane Traffic


Recommended Posts

Ultimatly Rye Lane suffers with a bad traffic problems, being too narrow for Buses, Deliveries and Cars, hence why something was implemented in the first place (The No Entry section at the Southern end) - and as most of the shops don't have rear access roads then the concept for banning delivery lorries isn't a viable or sustainable one for the business community.


Obviously the scheme needs to be reviewed as the delivery lorries tend to bunch up in large clusters (causing traffic flow problems) and some cars need to access the lane to collect bulky goods. This is made worse by the Bendy Buses at the moment which take up twice the road space as a normal bus.


The Peckham Town Centre Management Group (PTCMG) would be interested in your thoughts on this matter as we have the same comments from our business members and we want to present a paper to the council in the new year to express realistic concepts for improving the traffic and parking situation down Rye Lane (and in the town centre in general)


Many thanks in advance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blimey, now if there was a Peckham SE15 forum then this post could have been posted there instead of the East Dulwich SE22 forum as currently discussed about in the ' About this forum' section of this forum or perhaps it could have been posted in the Nunhead forum.


Those shops on Rye lane sure need their deliveries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, it would probably be the only post on there!


My experience with these deliveries were that they weren't the problem alone - people take the piss by leaving the vans parked up outside shops for hours on end. I get frustrated by traders hiding behind 'business necessity' when all it's really about is convenience and laziness.


The roads seem pretty empty at 7am - Peckham's a late rising village. Perhaps restricting deliveries to 6am to 8.30am only? (Rye Lane isn't a commuter route).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting views so far, and yes the Rising Bollards scheme did have a slight drawback - it didn't work in Peckham (rumour has it that the scheme was visited in Oxford and was deemed to be a good idea for Peckham, which is a different type of town centre and community)


Still interested in people's views as we want to turn the town centre away from "what do you expect, this is Peckham" to "THIS is Peckham?" (as in a nice surprise to visitors)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My son’s primary school hatched duck eggs, probably under this scheme around 12 years ago.  We were all very upset to hear that 2 of the (5 year old) boys had knocked the incubator over & all eggs smashed.   feeling a lot less sad about that now!  
    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...