Jump to content

Plane noise and Heathrow Community Engagement Board


BB Camberwell

Recommended Posts

For those affected by overflight to Heathrow: the newish Heathrow Community Engagement Board canvassing our views:


'If Heathrow Airport affects you, we're here to help. To effectively challenge Heathrow Airport and deliver for you, we need to know what matters to you. Take 5 minutes to complete our survey.' https://www.hceb.org.uk/survey


Plane Hell Action draws your attention to HCEB's use of the word 'respite' - breaks from being immediately overflown but noise still within loud earshot i.e. concentrated flight paths. We are campaigning for 'relief and widely distributed flight paths to spread the noise fairly'. To make this clear we suggest that you make use of the 'Other' option to respond and to emphasise 'relief'.


Advance notice of 2 consultations early in 2019:


1. Heathrow Airspace and future operations consultation:https://afo.heathrowconsultation.com/


8 Jan - 4 Mar 2019 - with public exhibitions (not reaching further than Central London i.e. no SE London venues) and LHR staff on hand to answer questions. The focus will be Independent Parallel Approaches and Design Envelopes - see Heathrow's FAQs: https://www.heathrowconsultation.com/faq/


2. The CAA will be consulting on a new process to consider certain changes to air traffic control procedures that result in a planned and permanent redistribution of air traffic, February 2019: http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/modalapplication.aspx?appid=11&mode=detail&id=8127.


If you need clarification or an explanation regarding these consultations the Aviation Environment Federation (https://www.aef.org.uk/)is an excellent source of information - and responsive, too. Plane Hell Action is a member.


Finally, we have been working hard to make SE Londoners' concerns about plane noise known:


* the GLA Environment Committee invited us to a meeting at City Hall and used much of the information gathered for

their public meeting on 8 November 2018 with Heathrow, London City and NATS

* the Heathrow Community Engagement Board met us in central London

* a meeting with London City Airport is being discussed

* we attend Heathrow Community Noise Forum and working group meetings

* presentations have been made to the Forest Hill and Dulwich Societies by Tim Walker, one of our fellow campaigners,

and Walworth Society has invited us in early in 2019.


Bridget Bell for Plane Hell Action: https://planehellaction.org.uk/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...