Jump to content

Queues at Lordship Lane Post Office


Sue

Recommended Posts

I can understand a queue on Monday morning, or Saturday, or before Christmas - but a queue right out into the street at 4pm on a Wednesday afternoon?


I had to wait over twenty minutes to be served, and at one point the queue wasn't moving at all, just one customer at the counter and all the staff just sort of looking at each other.


Anybody know why? Have they got a staffing problem or do they just not care?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe there's always a half hour queue because all the others in the vicinity have closed down so everyone has to go to the same one!


Edited to add: The annoying thing is that the stamp machine never seems to work....i only ever need to buy stamps very infrequently, so never want to buy a whole book, just the individual stamp. of course, when the stamp machines dont work, this can mean queueing for ages and ages just for a bloomin 40p stamp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

paulino Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Edited to add: The annoying thing is that the

> stamp machine never seems to work....i only ever

> need to buy stamps very infrequently, so never

> want to buy a whole book, just the individual

> stamp. of course, when the stamp machines dont

> work, this can mean queueing for ages and ages

> just for a bloomin 40p stamp.


A book of stamps is around ?2.40 - you could keep them in a drawer until next time you needed one


-they are legal tender - you could go and have a swift half using the remaining 5


-make a collage


-sell them back to people outside the post office for a profit


-become a 'man of letters'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just thinking this after a visit to the PO at Aldwych. It beggars belief on two levels - if POs are so out of touch, why are they always so busy, and if POs are so crap, why don't the managers put more staff on to make it better? Today, there was a man 'guiding' customers to the counters, for heaven's sake!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually one of my pet hates - every visit to any post office causes me rage, and they are all the same. The problem, IMO, is that they offer way too many services - people go in there to pay bills, withdraw money, change money, buy TV license stamps, get application forms for almost anything, all in addition to normal post related services. There also appears to be an antiquated social element to most offices from times long gone - a whole generation grew up with post offices having a central function in the community.

I do understand that not everyone wants or can use the internet to download forms or make direct debits etc, but at the same time, I haven't seen the PO make any effort to adapt to modern times. I just wish the Government had had the vision + nads to privatize it a long time ago. I think it's probably beyond hope now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you suggest the post office makes money then? Should they abandon all of the services you describe?


Yes, because privatising it would do wonders for us all.


For one thing, unprofitable personal mail would be downgraded - and probably take longer to deliver.


Private ownership will lead to thousands of redundancies, a reduction in services and higher prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone else is queuing for minor matters that could be dealt with elsewhere, delaying me from getting about my important affairs.


The social element is an especial disgrace, of course. I'll tell my Gran that she's a hindrance to the productivity of someone else's working day, and if she really needs to chat to someone she should register with her local internet forum and wobble her bosom on there instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Everyone else is queuing for minor matters that

> could be dealt with elsewhere, delaying me from

> getting about my important affairs.

>




?Important affairs? = I sell a lot of Star Wars men on eBay

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lenk Wrote:

> Private ownership will lead to thousands of

> redundancies, a reduction in services and higher

> prices.


Umm yes, precisely. That's the best and most awesome bit. A rotten business would get put out of its misery, and anything useful would emerge from the ashes via the magic of market forces. Great innit? There's a big market in Star Wars men delivery(6)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lenk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How do you suggest the post office makes money

> then? Should they abandon all of the services you

> describe?

>

> Yes, because privatising it would do wonders for

> us all.

>

> For one thing, unprofitable personal mail would be

> downgraded - and probably take longer to deliver.

>

> Private ownership will lead to thousands of

> redundancies, a reduction in services and higher

> prices.


xxxxxxxx


Royal Mail, who delivers the letters, is a separate business from Post Office Counters.


Edited to say: Several grammatical mistakes there, sorry, but can't be arsed to work out what it should all be :-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get why some people want post-offices to stay - maybe older people who are comfortable with the familiar


But I don't understand why most other people complain about them and the service they offer. Not that I'm defending the service, I'm just curious as to why so many people need to use them. In 40 years I think I've been in one maybe twice and both times as a favour to someone else. What is it they do that you can't do elsewhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posting parcels, airmail, recorded/special delivery.


Things like renewal of driving licenses, road tax etc are supposed to work online but sometimes don't work properly, so you need to go into a post office to get it done. Also, passport renewal from the post office is quite convenient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I know there are those things - but is there that much volume? Some people seem to be regular users.


If I had to send a lot of parcels for example would I not be better off setting up an account with UPS or whoever and having them come pick up? More expensive I'm sure - but then cheapness = less staff = more queues. So you makes your choice etc..


I dunno, I'm mostly curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Lordship Lane Post office is my local, now, and I can never predict when there will be no queues. Monday morning at 11 it can be empty. An hour later queue out the door. But I am patient because it is not their fault, and they're very friendly and kind, and Nilesh the post master is the chair of the Police Ward Panel, so an important and contributing member of the local community.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

queued 30 mins last week to posta little parcel.

needed a passport application form this week, so just went straight to counter said excuse me to person being served and requested one over the shoulder of person being served. took 30 secs.

gotta draw the line somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do send alot of parcels and sending them by UPS/DHL etc is prohibitively expensive.


When the post office evaluates which branches to close, the only business they take into consideration is how much mail a post office takes. The amount of card business (pensions, giro), the amount of savings accounts opened, tax disc renewals, holiday insurance sold etc. means absolutely nothing in the decision.


The concern at Lordship Lane is that although you often queue out the door, only a small proportion is mail business so their regional big bosses actually think that its not a busy post office. On Monday I counted 14 people in front of me in the queue, 13 were card business, getting pensions and giros, and the other was renewing a passport. None of that means anything to Crozier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just had a carpets cleaned by Steve Nourse and his colleague at short notice. They are lovely guys and the cleaning was quick and carpets look great. Good value. 
    • Looking for tickets for 2 adults one child under 2 and one child over 2. However, please let me know if you have any combination of tickets you are no longer able to use.  Thanks 07756110500
    • all I said was "take a pro cash stance too far" - what twisting have I done?   plenty of good arguments for retention of cash - but let's not get too detached from reality either lest we go back to trading livestock   But to go back to your post DD:   "Or don't stop using cash" Yep plenty of people will agree with this - nothing controversial here   "Stop using your phone or even your watch as a banknote" - getting a bit weird now - why not - it's super convenient for both users and businesses. And far easier to keep a track of your balance using your electronic wallet than old systems of cheques taking days to clear, how much did I take from cashpoint 2 days ago etc. But people will differ so whatever works   "God only knows how much damage we're doing to the planet because all the above must require a hell of a lot of resources and juice from the grid" - big straw man argument here. Why bring this in? Unless you are also suggesting we don't buy any goods not made from within a 5 mile radius and nothing transported by air or sea? "a big lump of plastic with a screen and full of personal information that can be easily gleamed." I've had my phone stolen but nothing was lost because it was secure.I've been mugged and lost cash and valuable. It's not a binary thing   "your sky rocket with a phone in your hand. It's become a source of dopamine for many. It's an addiction for many."  Proper overreaching now
    • I agree with the posts that housing is an urgent need in Peckham and throughout Southwark. But as Alice says, it’s the percentage of social / affordable housing that matters. In October last year, there were over 4,200 households on the Council’s waiting list for housing in Peckham alone (over 17 thousand across Southwark). But the developer is only offering 35% affordable housing (which means that 65% will be unaffordable). Both Southwark Council and the GLA say that a big development like this should provide 50% affordable housing.   Re-development of the site is a great opportunity to make the town centre “cleaner, safer and more sustainable and welcoming” (borrowing Nigello’s great words). Is this dense development going to do that, when it provides no real green and open space where people can spend time outside and nature can help us tackle the growing problems of climate change like absorbing flood water, cooling the air on baking summer days? Are 7-storey buildings along Rye Lane (where the average buildings are 2-3 storeys) going to be welcoming to users of the town centre? How will the development impact on Peckham’s economy? Currently there is busy daytime commercial activity of shops providing for different demographics and needs including a rich offering of international groceries and other products, alongside a thriving night-time economy. I can’t see anything in the proposal that suggests how it will enhance and empower the local economy. Yes please, let’s have a great development on this site that enhances the town centre. This means not letting the developer get away with packing people into dense blocks that turn their back on the town centre and which will be a recipe for urban decay in the long run. Peckham deserves better than this!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...