Jump to content

batey mineral water/ginger beer factory goose green


Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any info about Batey - the factory that produced bottles of mineral water/ginger beer? I understand it was somewhere overlooking Goose Green/on East Dulwich Road and was still there in about 1914.


My small son and I went beachcombing beside the Thames near the Tower of London, and among our haul of animal bones, clay pipes and oyster shells was a bottle stopper from Batey, of Goose Green.


I know there are often posts from local historians on here, just wondered if anyone

had any info to share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tanza.


I don't know for sure about Batey, but does that fact that the R Whites factory was still there on E D Rd until the late 60's, shed any light? Was one a continuation/expansion of the other?


For what it's worth the R Whites factory was between the swimming baths & the Church of Scotland Church (now the sheltered accom on the corner of Worlingham Rd.) & went back up away from ED Rd as far as the current boundary of the Goose Green Trading Est.

Two entrances, one at either side of the site's frontage on ED Rd ... but afraid no idea of the layout inside.


All demolished to be replaced by the Council offices & the trading estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you have probably already looked Tanza, but just in case I found this on knowhere


"Firstly, I'm mightily impressed by the responses I've had - thanks to all. Next, for Joan, I now know that the factory at Goose Green was (in 1914) the premises of Batey & Co., and described as a mineral water works. The firm was on the East Dulwich Road, immediately opposite the Green and next to a church which has long been demolished. It could well have been occupied by 'Whites' at some time, I suppose. Thanks now to Jim, I've sent for an old map of the Albany Road area and hope to be able to report back on that tomorrow. That will also give me a view of the Bianca Road site, assuming it existed in the early 1900's (thanks Gemma - you obviously suffered no ill effects from drinking vinegary lemonade - may have gone better with chips). And finally, Rose - you can be my next best mate if you like! Your tip relating to mis-spelling could well be the reason I've drawn several blanks when looking at the 1901 Census - plus the fact that no-one seemed to be called by their given names, ie I've searched for an Edward who finally turned up as 'Tedie', an Ellen, who the family always called 'Nellie' and, more strangely, a Janet Elizabeth who I spent ages searching for as Dolly because that's what the family told me it was. Turns out, when she was born, someone said she looked like a little doll and the name stuck - but not to her birth certificate!

Enough! More later perhaps. George<< less "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is fascinating. I think a visit to the local history library, (wherever that is) in order as I'd love to see a picture of the R Whites building, it's clearly the Batey mineral water building. I think Coca-Cola tried to launch a mineral water business out of Sidcup a few years back too, and Del Boy and Rodney out of Peckham in Only Fools and Horses - must be something in the air/water down here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was amazing. - I think the Museum of London are doing a few beachcombing expeditions this week, if you look on their website for details. I have a feeling there's one on Thursday. Not sure which bit of the Thames they use.


The one we went to was an organised session on the beach right under the Tower of London, (which was uncovered by the tide between 11.15 - 1pm) but I imagine the stairs leading down might be locked otherwise. There were archeologists on hand to explain the finds. It's a yearly event, the details were on Time Out. It was astonishing, there was so much to find, we were all stumbling across so much interesting material. They said that since Roman times people just used that stretch of the Thames as a rubbish dump, so I imagine that would be the case along the whole Thames. So as a result loads of oyster shells (that probably came from Whistable according to the experts) and bones from sheep and goats, dumped by butchers, lots of broken pottery and lots of clay pipes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The section of foreshore (both Banks, but North being better as a bit less developed.) either side of the Wobbly Bridge is quite a good spot & easily accessible via large steps.

As you say Tanza lots of bone, oysters, pottery & clay pipes.

I was intrigued that you can date the pipes by the size of the bowl.

Smaller (when tobacco was rarer & more expensive) = older.

With some examples being found dating back to Elizabethan times.


You can use this link to see when the tide will allow access.

An hour either side of low tide usually does it. Giving plenty of time for a rummage.


http://easytide.ukho.gov.uk/easytide/EasyTide/ShowPrediction.aspx?PortID=0113&PredictionLength=7


Tue 28 Jul

LW HW LW HW

01:12 07:08 13:14 19:13

0.2 m 6.9 m 0.8 m 6.8 m


Wed 29 Jul

LW HW LW HW

01:44 07:51 13:48 19:58

0.5 m 6.5 m 1.1 m 6.4 m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...