Jump to content

alternative swimming pools


Recommended Posts

now that ED pool is being refurbished I was wondering if anyone could tell me of a decent nearby pool I might be able to go to that doesn't involve being a member. I know the one in Camberwell but its not particularly nice. Any recommendations greatly appreciated.


Is the ED pool out of action for over a year?


Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuschia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What's Forest Hill like?


If you mean the swimming pool, shut since 2006 pending redevelopment...


The latest development I'm aware of is:


"On 15th July 2009 the Mayor and Cabinet of the London Borough of Lewisham decided to pursue a new option for Forest Hill Pools known as Option 3. This became possible because the Council was able to source ?3 million from elsewhere in its budget. They are now publicly committed to building new pools on the Dartmouth Road site, starting straightaway. They are also publicly committed to retaining the frontage block of the old pools building as part of the new building."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siduhe Wrote:


> They are now publicly committed to building new

> pools on the Dartmouth Road site, starting

> straightaway. They are also publicly committed to

> retaining the frontage block of the old pools

> building as part of the new building."



That sounds good... would be great if there was a learner pool there, now it's virtually impossible to get in to the one at p Pulse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, the total cost isn't ?3m, it's just there was a funding gap of ?2.9m between what the Council had put aside for the pool and what was needed - the extract I posted isn't clear, sorry. Will try and find the full details.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here you go. It's ?9.5m + ?3m.


http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/NewsAndEvents/News/ForestHillPoolsdecision.htm


Though to be fair, the Forest Hill Pool was/is structurally unsound and requires substantially more work than ED. The whole structure other than the facade is probably going to need to be either rebuilt or reinforced. And I know it's not strictly ED, so apologies Admin, but this decision is in huge part due to a very sustained and organised campaign by local residents to force Lewisham to rethink their original plans to close the pool for good, including but not limited to those who participated in the Forest Hill Pools Stakeholder Group and the Keep Swimming in Forest Hill Campaign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Original budget was "The 2009/10 ? 2011/12 Capital Programme budget report agreed by

Mayor & Cabinet in February 2009 provides ?9.406m for the Forest Hill

Pools project. Further to this a revenue reserve of ?179k was made

available in 2008/09 towards the costs to date of this project. Therefore

the total budget available is ?9.585m."


http://www.lewisham.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/E441F311-40F4-4772-A036-1A748494CFAB/0/5b5c175250264038bc2414251fd8dc31Item5ForestHillPools15July2009.PDF


Two pools are mentioned, so hopefully will include a baby pool. But not until 2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've been going to the Bridge lately, one main

> pool, which I've not been in, and a toddler/baby

> pool. Car park. Nice little round trip with a poss

> stop at the cafe at Savacentre.


And not far from Gambados. Toddler/baby pool you say... is it nice and warm?


http://www.leisurecentre.com/centres/10/home/The-Bridge-Leisure-Centre.aspx


http://www.leisurecentre.com/files/centres-swimmingpdf-10.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...