Jump to content

peckham rye caf? fire


iamyamyam

Recommended Posts

monica Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a shame, the Pavillion cafe in Dulwich park

> are always targeted, they fought to get CCTV and

> the last I heard it was installed but not working.

> Parks need 24 hour security, what happened to the

> good old park keeper.


Agreed. All CCTV does is record rather than prevent crime. What use is some grainy footage of youths in hoods anyway? It's probably not even admissible in court, as Westminster CC found out recently after installing their multi-million pound system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coo kford ... rather controversial "youths in hoods"...?! (spoken as the mother of former hoody wearing teenager who didn't commit offences and who is now (as then) a charming young man studying languages at University!) I agree that "youths in hoods" can be threatening and can commit criminal acts, but still...


And if anyone was responsible for attacking the Cafe in the Park, then bloody shame on them and I hope they/he/she get caught and made to face up to their actions and pay the consequences. Including a face to face apology to the business owners who provide, imo, a very lovely service.


T

x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fuzzyboots Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Coo kford ... rather controversial "youths in

> hoods"...?! (spoken as the mother of former hoody

> wearing teenager who didn't commit offences and

> who is now (as then) a charming young man studying

> languages at University!) I agree that "youths

> in hoods" can be threatening and can commit

> criminal acts, but still...

>

> And if anyone was responsible for attacking the

> Cafe in the Park, then bloody shame on them and I

> hope they/he/she get caught and made to face up to

> their actions and pay the consequences. Including

> a face to face apology to the business owners who

> provide, imo, a very lovely service.

>

> T

> x


what about insurance fraud / a genuine accidental fire?


Has that been ruled out?


Or are we already questioning all 'youths in hoods' within a 5-mile radius?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite so thebestnameshavegone! That was my sentiment entirely, although it seems I may not have made that clear!


I would doubt that there's an insurance fraud element in operation here, though.


The fire service, having unfortunately personally experienced a pretty serious housefire this year, are pretty damned good at initial assessment of the cause of fires, so I'm sure they'll have it all sorted. (Ours was an electrical fire caused by a random fault in an under the counter freezer and apparently, (we know now) they're not that uncommon!)


Whilst it may be tempting to mentally allocate this fire at the Cafe to "youths in hoods", let us not condemn "them" before they are found to be actually culpable, or indeed, anything to do with it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Controversial? Not sure about that. I think the point of the post was to highlight he failings of a CCTV system in general, in that the criminals can easily conceal their identity by wearing hoods. It depends on how you read it whether the comment was controversial or not
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A cafe is likely to have various items of electrical (and maybe gas) equipment switched on overnight - fridges, freezers, chilled display counters, water heaters, whatever - so, therefore, an electrical fire seems (to me) to be the first cause to be eliminated before malicious third parties are invoked.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fire investigation is a skilled business and you're right Hal that electrical faults are the cause of a large number of fires. In the first instance the fire investigator will be looking for this, as well as all other possible causes until evidence is discovered that points towards a probable cause. For example. any sign of break-in, evidence of accelerants, multiple seats of fire all point towards a suspicious cause.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear about what's happened. This cafe' does not fry food though right? Establishments that use fryers and that have extractor fans filling up with grease are much more likely to have a fire though, just like what happened to the chicken shop near the Bish. Could be electrical though, as Hal has pointed out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first post says "Apparently someone broke in and tried to torch it."

I look forward to hearing some more facts. I can practically see it from my flat but have not had the opportunity to go visit yet. It is so sad. The first meeting the Friends of Peckham Rye Park had with the architects of the first design was of a bigger cafe but with a lot of designing in of security and safety. Sadly the funds weren'tthere for the bigger cafe (although clearly it would have been worth it since the one we have is so very popular). I do hope we hear some facts soon about what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live on the rye, probably about as close as it is possible to live to the cafe and on the night in question saw, 'youths in hoods' trying to set each other on fire for 'a laugh', in the carpark outside my house, shortly after the rubbish bin directly next to my flat mysteriously caught fire, then later the cafe...I am quite happy to make the not too massive assumption that it was the same youths. Yes of course I told the police. This type of behaviour is not a 'youthful prank' but deadly, who knows what would have happened to me and baby if the bin fire had not been spotted?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hiya, I was told by the guy behind the counter at the cafe that someone had broken in and tried to set fire to the place. The police were there and what I took to be a foresnics person ( police or fire brigade i know not which) was photgraphing smoky hand prints which were visible from the seating area.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...