Jump to content

Suspicious caller


tfm33

Recommended Posts

Has anyone else in East Dulwich answered the door to a guy offering to trim their hedge, or similar enquiry?


He's called here twice now, once before Christmas, and once today. He has no tools with him, and upon his second visit, I felt suspicious, so watched him from the front window. He walked a few doors up the road, and then stared back at me for a full minute.


He is a white male in his late 50's in a sky blue hat. He spoke with an Irish accent and was wearing metal-framed glasses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it that the first placement was removed for some reason.

Any chance of a reason for that?



The message could not be posted. The exact same message has already been posted before and posting duplicate messages is not allowed in this forum.



---------------------------



..... a guy offering to trim their hedge, or similar enquiry?




Do you mean you were using a euphemism? ::o



PS: Page back is so useful ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the OP was using a euphimism, then the whole

> thread will be Lounged and you can knock yourself

> out


In fact I think that if the OPer was using a euphemism and the warning is about a pervert it has more right, not less, to be here as a caution.



Hey ho, bruiser :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

re a PM I have received about the autonomous (and split-second) removal of my first post on this thread I won't be PMing in reply.


My post was serious, it wasn't lewd or breaking any rules as I understand them.



In a forum that seems to comprise people that are mostly supportive of Assange I find it laughable that such autonomy is part of its Mods' equipment.


To be able to remove, without advice or explanation (or, seemingly, discussion) is bizarre ...... almost as robotic as Deadworld (aka Live) and Disqus.



Just an open thought, honest injuns :-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are any of your comments here relevant to thisthread? no?


Is that?

Is your 'no?' an answer to yourself or a question to me?

However, well done, you HAVE established bandwagoner credentials.

Why on earth do you not trust someone to look after themself in a spat?

The majority is NOT always right, the question WAS relevant.

Your possible disagreement about that is meaningless.




KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tfm33 if you're concerned by this visitor you

> really should report it to the police.

>

> safer neighbourhoods...



Quite so.

It would have been even more important (imhoo) to do so had the caller's suggestion been something else.



.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> are any of your comments here relevant to this

> thread? no?



Was that relevant to it?

Nope, I rate it as simply bandwagonhopping.

Well done.


YES, my first query IS relevant.

Was the OPer reporting obscenity, a form of sexual harassment or 'simply' someone casing the joint?

I would be FAR more concerned about the former and FAR less bothered about the latter.



The covert censorship here totally disproves the pretentious claims by so many on the ASSange thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He came around last summer and, at the time, I was disappointed I didn't take up the offer as the front hedge was rather overgrown and taking over the footpath. I had (dream on) intended to clean it up myself. Now I suspect I conveniently avoided being conned.


Then, last month, the council hacked it back to footpath level and took all the clippings away. Result! (Ta, Southwark.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the same guy that conned me out of ?20 last summer! I accepted his offer to trim the hedge in my front garden and when he was quarter of the way through I paid him as I had to go out. Needless to say when I got back the hedge still looked the same and he was nowhere to be seen! Felt very stupid but have learnt a lesson!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad I read this thread as a man has offered to trim the hedge a few weeks ago, same description as mentioned by tfm33. He said that he had just done a job for one of the neighbours and asked for ?25. I said I was not sure and he came by again 2 weeks ago.


tfm33 - I see that this has been reported to the police. Not sure if I should notify them again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...