Jump to content

No access to forum!


Huggers

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What error message do you get?


7 Sept 2020


I can open Dulwich forum on my computer but for days now on my ipad it just says page unavailable try again.although prior to this happening there was now problem


An answer to allow me to use the ipad would be greatly appreciated


Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed on Sunday that I wasn't able to access the forum from work on either Mozilla, Chrome or IE. It worked OK on my phone though and it is working fine here at home.

The error message I was getting at work was something like the host server isn't reponding or couldn't be verified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The following is copied from parallel thread https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?12,2144464,2144604#msg-2144604 and slightly augmented. I emailed Admin about this yesterday evening but haven't heard anything yet. A couple of tweaks of my Firefox config hasn't made any difference.


I'm getting probably the same problem, since Saturday. "Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Error code: SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT * The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem."


This was using Firefox and IE9 on a Windows system; and Firefox and Lynx on a Centos 6.5 system. But this plucky little Raspberry Pi 3 running Raspbian and Chrome is getting through. All via home Plusnet. The forum server is, as expected, reachable from all these machines via ping or traceroute. Am browsing around for suggested local remedies, but first couple found haven't been of help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Hi


Thanks for the messages and apologies for the issues.


We have a problem with emails not going out from the server, the mail host recently updated to a protocol called TLS v1.3 and they suggested changing the forum to v1.3 as this will allow emails to go through. However not only do emails not go through it affects beople looking at the website.


Apologies and we'll try to get it changed back to an older version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...