Forum Sponsors

http://www.gardenia-gardens.com
xxxx
www.no-flies.co.uk

Pippa's Guardians

Advertise here

The East Dulwich Forum
Which pubs, bars, restaurants and take-aways do you avoid?
Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 3 of 5
messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 31 May, 2018 17:10

Exeunt is a plural and only used when more than one character leaves. Nothing funnier than seeing someone trying to be clever and failing miserably through ignorance - or are you referring to your split personality as a nice person (according to you) and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist (according to those who've seen your previous incarnation)?

You described Robinson's propaganda as "his videos of what is actually happening in his Hometown of Luton." Clear affirmation of the fact that you believe them. No "allegedly" or any other qualifier, you've watched a video made by a proven neo-fascist and taken it as a true account of "what is actually happening". Your words.

Re the videos, the BBC video Robinson showed referred to people being subject to racial attacks. No mention of Islam or religion at all.

Re Stacey Dooley being abused, she was abused by a small number - a very small number - of stupid fanatics. Wrong? Definitely. Representative? No. Same for finding a few idiots who say they only obey Sharia law.

If you want to stir up hatred, it's very easy to find a few hotheads with ignorant bigotted opinions (I trust you recognise yourself) and make a video framed to make it look as though they represent the majority. The fact that you find such videos interesting and refer to their content as if it's clearly true speaks volumes.

There's a reason it hasn't been discussed in the Guardian or indeed other media outlets - it's because, unlike you, most people don't fall hook line and sinker for whatever biased manipulated rubbish is served up as truth in order to fuel hatred and confirm prejudice.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was 2018:05:31:17:11:59 by rendelharris.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Robert Poste's Child 31 May, 2018 17:22

QD, the thing to remember when watching video is that it's edited. The process starts with a point of view or a message and the available footage is cut to support that. Even genuine reporting, whether it's for TV, print or radio, reflects the agenda or ideology of the organisation that produces it. It's rarely politically neutral.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 17:34

edcam Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The same as I said before since you ask.
>
> Quia Differt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > What say you now ?

So, for example you think originally putting "TonySebastianFarquharson.co.uk", for example, and the second time round
"TonySebastianFarquharson.. com" constitutes trying some form of deception and getting " caught out?".does it ?

smiling smiley

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 31 May, 2018 17:37

Quia Differt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> edcam Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The same as I said before since you ask.
> >
> > Quia Differt Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > What say you now ?
>
> So, for example you think originally putting
> "TonySebastianFarquharson.co.uk", for example, and
> the second time round
> "TonySebastianFarquharson.. com" constitutes
> trying some form of deception and getting " caught
> out?".does it ?
>
> smiling smiley

You're in danger of distracting from the main point of why people were laughing at you, which is that you have had to develop a new alias as previously you were banned from the forum for being a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist. I'm sure you'd like people to remember that.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 17:38

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> QD, the thing to remember when watching video is
> that it's edited. The process starts with a point
> of view or a message and the available footage is
> cut to support that. Even genuine reporting,
> whether it's for TV, print or radio, reflects the
> agenda or ideology of the organisation that
> produces it. It's rarely politically neutral.

You make a salient point RPC. You are right in saying that.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 18:07

rendelharris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Exeunt is a plural and only used when more than
> one character leaves. Nothing funnier than seeing
> someone trying to be clever and failing miserably
> through ignorance -

Ah!1 You seem to have sobered up ! Excellent !

So you are a Grammar Nazi, as well as a mere run-of-the-mill Nazi who wants to stifle a debate ? You got the Double up. Well Done You. lol

or are you referring to your split personality as a nice person (according to
> you)

ONCE AGAIN where did I say that ? It's Another Lie isn't it rendell? ...If not kindly show me where I said that then, please?

"and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist
> (according to those who've seen your previous
> incarnation)?...

What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes around..

." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only reference to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.

Nothing funnier than seeing someone " hoist by their own petard" as Shakespeare would say which is funnier seeing that you picked me up on a stage direction often used in The Bard's Plays!

I thought you knew the difference between Singular and Plural ? Seems Not !!! smiling smiley

SHEER BLISS...How do you feel now ? smiling smiley

TALKING of "Approval" you BLATANTLY lied when you said I "APPROVED" of what he said adding the "neo-nazi attachment" for further effect. Nothing funnier than seeing someone be so weak that they can not admit to a blatant "untruth" when caught out so I ask you again ..Why did you say I approved of what he SAID where I have CLEARLY demonstrated I didn't ?

So was it a mistake or yet another lie from you then Rendell ?

I didn't bother with the rest of your "drivel"

Continually blatantly lying does you no favours at all mijn vriend..

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 31 May, 2018 18:12

Quia Differt Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> rendelharris Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------

> "and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist
> > (according to those who've seen your previous
> > incarnation)?...
>
> What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes
> around..
>
> ." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only reference
> to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT
> PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE
> CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.

"Those" referring to both Admin and those others who have seen your previous incarnation, including me, as your slithering unpleasant statements are still easily discoverable on this forum. Nice try, failed. You're neither witty enough nor clever enough to try that sort of thing, I'm afraid.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 18:22

rendelharris:
>
> You're in danger of distracting from the main
> point of why people were laughing at you, which is
> that you have had to develop a new alias as
> previously you were banned from the forum for
> being a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist.
> I'm sure you'd like people to remember that.

Again you fail to differentiate between Singular and Plural. There was just ONE comment to that effect.
An opinion by someone referring to my comments many years ago. Just one person's opinion. Well this one person's opinion was that that comment was nonsense.

The fact that YOU and your sidekick have chosen to repeat that phrase over and over does not make it correct. It takes " sucking up" to a new low but it IS amusing so keep it up ! smiling smiley
OBVIOUSLY if I was banned I HAD to use another name but Admin are the important ones here not you and I made no attempt to change my name to them so stop talking nonsense.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 18:26

rendelharris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Quia Differt Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > rendelharris Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > "and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist
> > > (according to those who've seen your previous
> > > incarnation)?...
> >
> > What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes
> > around..
> >
> > ." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only
> reference
> > to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT
> > PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE
> > CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.
>
> "Those" referring to both Admin and those others
> who have seen your previous incarnation, including
> me, as your slithering unpleasant statements are
> still easily discoverable on this forum. Nice
> try, failed. You're neither witty enough nor
> clever enough to try that sort of thing, I'm
> afraid.

You said "ACCORDING TO THOSE".....that CLEARLY suggests OTHERS have mentioned that was their opinion of me from before which no-one else has on here so AGAIN you are wrong.

Pathetically you have STILL not let us all know why you LIED about saying I "approved" of The Subjects views so why did you lie as you MUST know it was a lie because I only wrote 3/4 lines so it's easy to reference.

Again why the blatant lie rendelharris ?

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 31 May, 2018 18:32

Bored with your drivel now, there's a limit to how interesting it is watching someone make a fool of himself before it all just becomes rather pathetic. You've amply demonstrated what sort of person you are, I shall not be responding to any more of your leaden "wit" nor your spoon-sharp intellectual points. Farewell, skin crawling casual-racist misogynist.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Robert Poste's Child 31 May, 2018 18:51

QD, something I've wondered about since your first posts in your new name is that there's a sense that English may not be your first language. I'm asking from genuine interest as I realise it might make a difference to how people interpret your comments.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 18:53

rendelharris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bored with your drivel now, there's a limit to how
> interesting it is watching someone make a fool of
> himself before it all just becomes rather
> pathetic. You've amply demonstrated what sort of
> person you are, I shall not be responding to any
> more of your leaden "wit" nor your spoon-sharp
> intellectual points. Farewell, skin crawling
> casual-racist misogynist.

I asked you at 2.44 not to acknowledge me so blame yourself and your myriad of replies since then.

Farewell O , what's the word rendel for someone who is incredibly rude and offensive, acts as a Grammar and Verbal Nazi, tries a smearing campaign and fails, then in desperation blatantly lies and then,pitifully, refuses 3 times to answer why he lied and now wants to disappear over the horizon with his tail between his legs ?

I do APOLOGISE though for not resorting to smearing or lying or name-calling or being rude or being ofensive ( well not too much ) but just remember to instil into your pupils your Mantra that :

1/ No-one should be given a second chance
2/ That they should automatically believe someone's opinion about someone from comments made years ago that they have not seen themselves without seeing any evidence
3/ That at all times they should attempt to stifle debate if someone has a different opinion
4/ Re-assure them if all else fails try to smear them and get them to enlist others to do the same
5/ Failing that just get them to lie through their teeth
6/ When called out on that get them to continually ignore the accusation
7/ Then if and when, sadly, the battle is lost get them to retreat over the horizon not to re-appear until the dust settles and most importantly of all and you MUST empthasise this rendel that whatever the situation they ignore all facts to the contrary of their beliefs and maintain a fixed and rigid view that they must not change UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES and then they can follow in your illustrious footsteps.

Farewell... smiling smiley

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 18:54

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> QD, something I've wondered about since your first
> posts in your new name is that there's a sense
> that English may not be your first language. I'm
> asking from genuine interest as I realise it might
> make a difference to how people interpret your
> comments.

Beautiful. I like that RPC. smiling smiley

You have got me thinking RPC. Who knows on a different forum on a different subject at a different time who knows where our banter could have taken us and what it might have lead to ?

Anyway your pesky brother rendel has finally gone so what you doing on the forum later ?
Could you teach me to write and talk proper has I do strugle wiv me engleesch sumtimes ?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was 2018:05:31:19:11:41 by Quia Differt.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Robert Poste's Child 31 May, 2018 19:38

Sorry, washing my hair.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Quia Differt 31 May, 2018 19:49

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorry, washing my hair.

Thank You for letting me down gently RPC.

btw: Would you mind awfully if I plagirised that " sense of that English may not be your first language. ? "

I can imagine you writing that with a sweet smile which is a happy note to end on...smiling smiley

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Administrator 31 May, 2018 20:17

Five valid complaints about you now Quia Differt / Tony London Suburbs.

You're fired.

--------------------
The Administrator
______________________
Help & FAQ's - Terms of use

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 31 May, 2018 20:29

Thank you, Admin.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Robert Poste's Child 31 May, 2018 20:32

I'd add one to that but I'm still scrubbing myself all over with carbolic and a nail brush.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by edcam 01 June, 2018 00:30

Thanks Admin. He was like some awful thing from the Daily Mail forum. Creepy AF. Nothing wrong with some healthy debate and differences of opinion but definitely something off about him.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by flocker spotter 01 June, 2018 16:22

now that the yax -lennon thread shouting has died down abit, maybe it would be possible to move the conversation one step further.Lets assume that Yax isnt the issue here- this has been touched on several times on here, but i feel that he is merely a symptom of some kind of larger societal malaise & by shouting about the yx misses the point somewhat.shouty populists do not grow and flower in places with a sunny outlook. By focusing on the symptoms - brexit/ yaxley/conspiracy loonery/ mistrust of people in positions in authority/ peadophile fear etc - we miss the cause of the problem. what is going on and what does this tell us about the health of UK society at the minute ?

Without being patronising - as if - outside London and the odd larger metropolitan area- the majority of the country are not happy with their lot. yes, there are local triggers and local pressures in the background that take the headlines , but what is going on, on a wider level, what is the cause of this perspective?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit was 2018:06:01:16:27:36 by flocker spotter.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Charles Martel 02 June, 2018 00:47

"What on earth happened to poor Tommy Robinson? 10 Things You Should Know."
[thesecretbarrister.com]

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by Robert Poste's Child 02 June, 2018 08:56

Thanks for posting that. A refreshingly rational and reasonable account.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 02 June, 2018 09:08

Interesting rational account, I've been using it to irritate the "Free Tommy Robinson" eejits who are befouling just about every Facebook thread this morning.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by JohnL 01 August, 2018 11:06

Oh Gawd he's out - re-trial.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rahrahrah 01 August, 2018 11:09

Oh dear

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by uncleglen 01 August, 2018 17:58

about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by ianr 01 August, 2018 18:13

JohnL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh Gawd he's out - re-trial.

You're unhappy about his being bailed?

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by JoeLeg 01 August, 2018 18:47

uncleglen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH


I would have time for him if he was truly attacking religious extremism and child abuse equally.

But hes not.

Hes only focused on Muslims.

Do you wonder why he never mentions the abuses by the Catholic Church, for example? Or the bigotry found within Hindu fundamentalists?

Do you wonder why hes only interested in targeting Islam, while excusing a pedophile friend of his?
Google Richard Price.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by rendelharris 01 August, 2018 20:30

uncleglen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH

Jolly good. He was certainly telling the TRUTH when he pleaded guilty to the charges on which he was convicted and apologised saying he felt "deep regret" after realising that the consequences of his actions could have been to let guilty men go free and necessitate retrials costing hundreds of thousands of pounds. If he was so innocent, why did he plead guilty and apologise? He's been released on procedural grounds and legal experts fully expect him to be reconvicted at a new trial. He has not been found innocent, he has been sent for a new trial.

If you have room for just one thing in your bile-filled hate-boiling Islamaphobic skull, make it this: the men accused of paedophilia were on trial. They were found guilty and given long sentences. The only person who risked them not receiving the sentences they thoroughly deserved was the many times convicted (amongst his convictions are drug possession, assault on a police officer, common assault, threatening and abusive behaviour and mortgage fraud) Stephen Yaxley-Lennon.

Still, nice to see you coming out as the filthy EDL supporter we all know you are. And spare us any squeals of outrage, if you say that all SYL aka TR has ever done is told the truth, you support the EDL and their ilk.

messageRe: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Posted by siousxiesue 01 August, 2018 23:09

uncleglen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH


Oh I assumed this was sarcasm! Obviously not..

Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 3 of 5

Back to top of page
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Donate                   Terms of use                  Help & FAQs                   Advertise               RSS rss feed               Copyright 2006 - 2018 East Dulwich Forum