Jump to content

Tommy Robinson and DHFC


malumbu

Recommended Posts

Hopefully this will provoke some debate. Looks like footy fan and all round 'nice guy' Tommy has a close association with DHFC. Not the 'right on' Dulwich Hamlet with close associations with more left wing causes, and links with like minded teams across the channel, but the conservative American organisation (I stop short of think tank). Interestingly not only the Grauniad picked up on this (who should have also noted the potential confusion on their own backyard) but the Mail.


Anyway TR and his pro Brexit lot marching today, an irrelevance and distraction or sign of things to come? And Momentum marching with those against leaving the EU. Confused or what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'some debate' on here-, about THAT sort of thing....the fact that the DHFC (David Horowitz Freedom Centre) has a website called 'Jihad Watch' means that it has been branded 'islamophobic'...like anything else, (or anyone else) that points out the honest truth about what is, and what has been, going on...which, of course, is all that T. Robinson has EVER done- and I daresay the DHFC..... c'mon rendelharris join the 'debate'
Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'some debate' on here-, about THAT sort of

> thing....the fact that the DHFC (David Horowitz

> Freedom Centre) has a website called 'Jihad Watch'

> means that it has been branded

> 'islamophobic'...like anything else, (or anyone

> else) that points out the honest truth about what

> is, and what has been, going on...which, of

> course, is all that T. Robinson has EVER done- and

> I daresay the DHFC..... c'mon rendelharris join

> the 'debate'


Thanks for the invitation, and it would be quite easy to make an antisemitic racist Islamaphobe neo-fascist supporter like yourself look a complete fool, but your own words have already done the job for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gerrard Batten said in an interview last week that he wonders if he has done the right thing but he is looking at what Tommy can bring ie avenues to money (American) and new members. Given that the EDL, FLA, DFLA etc are all proscribed organisations form UKIP (Even Tommy can not join them lol). Batten might be wishful thinking there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKIP was always the "acceptable face" of the hard right... if you fraternise with that lot, you're either a racist, or you knowingly turn a blind eye to racism, or you're incredibly stupid.


Tommy Robinson and his ilk getting involved with UKIP is probably a good thing if it means their true agenda is a little more transparent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'some debate' on here-, about THAT sort of

> thing....the fact that the DHFC (David Horowitz

> Freedom Centre) has a website called 'Jihad Watch'

> means that it has been branded

> 'islamophobic'...like anything else, (or anyone

> else) that points out the honest truth about what

> is, and what has been, going on...which, of

> course, is all that T. Robinson has EVER done- and

> I daresay the DHFC..... c'mon rendelharris join

> the 'debate'


Tommy Robinson is receiving support and funding from foreign, unaccountable sources looking to push political agendas on the U.K.. He is at best naive and I personally think he is treading dangerously close to, shall we say, working with foreign agents against the best interests of this nation.


I do not argue with the idea that we must be vigilant against those who would seek to introduce a way of life not compatible with what people in this country consider to be civilised, but I would also argue that the intelligence services have already had considerable success in handling that threat.


Yaxley-Lennon and his ilk have a very keen interest specifically in Islam, to the extent that he excused paedophilic behaviour in his white compatriots and is now openly admitting that he is only interested in anti-Islamic action.

He does not have the aim of helping this nation, rather his intention is to introduce, little by little, an environment hostile to members of a specific religion with the a of removing them from society. And then what will come next we wonder?


You have to be a special kind of stupid not to see that when even Farage disowns you, the game is up.


Football Lads Alliance? EDL? Britain First? All birds of a feather. They are not interested in making a better Britain; they are throwbacks who yearn for a time when the white man was dominant.


?All that T Robinson has ever done? is to try and present himself as ?just a man of the people?. He is not. Do you know how reviled he was by serving and former service personnel - of all political persuasions - for that service station stunt? He had very few friends in this country, which is why he seeks help from abroad.


You should be very concerned about the bedfellows he keep, and the influence he seeks to allow into our society. I?d suggest you look a little closer at Yaxley-Lennon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sausagefingers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> god radical liberals at it again . we voted to

> leave and leave means leave


What a highly imaginative slogan, well done. Even if you stick to the moribund and foolish belief that the law of the United Kingdom cannot be adapted and amended as circumstances dictate (let alone that the result of a non-binding referendum must be slavishly followed at all costs) you can still object to neo-fascists marching in the street, whatever the particular cause they've chosen to hang their hate on.


Back under the bridge, troll. What is it with those of your ilk and punctuation, by the way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sausagefingers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> god radical liberals at it again . we voted to

> leave and leave means leave


Cool story bro...


What the %^*= does that have to do with Mr Yaxley-Lennon?

Did you just want to ?stick it? to those liberals because you can?t think of anything to counter the points about your poster boy for British values?


Yeah, that?s pretty much what I figured. If you want to argue about what ?Leave? means, take it to the Brexit thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...