Jump to content

Preparations for Trump's State visit 3-5 June - Demo central London on Tuesday


IlonaM

Recommended Posts

http://togetheragainsttrump.org.uk/plans-for-the-day/


'National Demonstration: Tuesday 4 June


Assemble 11am at Trafalgar Square, march to Downing Street and then to Parliament Square, creating a Trump-free zone and Carnival of Resistance.


Join the Facebook event for latest updates. Check the Getting There page for coaches to London.


Leaflets are available to pick up from Unite, 128 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8TN. It?s also available to download if you can get them printed yourself.'


Leaflet attached as pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand part of Downing Street is being closed off by police, so it won't be possible to get directly to Parliament Square from Trafalgar Square, or vice versa?


ETA: Sorry, obviously I meant Whitehall!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand part of Downing Street is being

> closed off by police, so it won't be possible to

> get directly to Parliament Square from Trafalgar

> Square, or vice versa?



There is a petition calling for the police to reverse that decision: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruiter=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition


More info also at: https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activists-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trafalgar Square is connected to Parliament Square

> Via Whitehall and Parliament Street.

> Downing street is Off of Whitehall and has no

> public access.

>

> they would need to close Whitehall



They would not need to close the whole of Whitehall, Dulwich Fox, and were not intending to.


Not from what I understand, anyway.


ETA: My understanding was that they were going to block off part of the middle so that demonstrators could not gather near the entrance to Downing Street, and also could not walk down Whitehall directly between Trafalgar Square and Parliament Square, but would have to go a longer way round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> to

> > get directly to Parliament Square from

> Trafalgar

> > Square, or vice versa?

>

>

> There is a petition calling for the police to

> reverse that decision:

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

> opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

>

> More info also at:

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/



The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures, from your link???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> IlonaM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> > to

> > > get directly to Parliament Square from

> > Trafalgar

> > > Square, or vice versa?

> >

> >

> > There is a petition calling for the police to

> > reverse that decision:

> >

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

>

> >

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

>

> >

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

>

> > opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

> >

> > More info also at:

> >

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

>

> >

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

>

>

> The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures,

> from your link???



Over 70,000!


Try this link: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After the USS John McCain fiasco in Japan, I think

> the protesters on Tuesday should carry large

> photos of John McCain!



:)) :)) :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

snoopy17 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No respect.

>

> Why didn't you protest when the royal family had

> dinner with the saudi government?


...Saudi who?

What about boycotting Brunei...?

I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Presidential plane is in sight over Stanstead

> when Sky News break that the President has just

> tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.


Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan is taking the visit as a great opportunity for electioneering...


And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people obviously supported his policies and are still happy with them. I am not sure where his decision about the transgender people in the military is coming from but that is for them to decide and I dare say the military have reported on the cost of surgeries and treatment and the disruption to service by transgender soldiers and a decision was made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on anything they can to smear Trump- much like the attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all that is the nature of the filthy world of politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Presidential plane is in sight over

> Stanstead

> > when Sky News break that the President has just

> > tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.

>

> Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan

> is taking the visit as a great opportunity for

> electioneering...

>

> And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people

> obviously supported his policies and are still

> happy with them. I am not sure where his decision

> about the transgender people in the military is

> coming from but that is for them to decide and I

> dare say the military have reported on the cost of

> surgeries and treatment and the disruption to

> service by transgender soldiers and a decision was

> made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on

> anything they can to smear Trump- much like the

> attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all

> that is the nature of the filthy world of

> politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love

> an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits

> in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'


Wrong on all counts. You appear to be a Trump supporter and notice the way you slip in your view on transgender and the military. Also your use of the word "filthy". All round depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooo... We shouldn't take things out of context.


Trump openly tweeted:


"Sadiq Khan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly 'nasty' to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me.


Kahn reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job - only half his height.


In any event, I look forward to being a great friend to the United Kingdom, and am looking very much forward to my visit. Landing now."


I completely agree with him because he's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snoopy17 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No respect.

> >

> > Why didn't you protest when the royal family

> had

> > dinner with the saudi government?

>

> ...Saudi who?

> What about boycotting Brunei...?

> I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity.

> ;-)



You wont find the far-left boycotting anyone of colour. It wouldn't support their narrative of being anti-racist. :)


Takes me back to a very interesting "debate". This gave me the tickles.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth & reality of the situation is that the UK will be leaving the EU - that is what the majority of Britain voted for. Whilst those who voted remain are busy doing this




or storming the streets like the sore losers that they are, the fact still stands that we are due to leave the EU, so I'm curious to know whether they've been spending any of the past 2 years productively thinking of ways to help themselves.


I take it the far-left are more comfortable with a hard-Brexit than they make out to be, given that they're chasing away our greatest ally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...