Jump to content

Preparations for Trump's State visit 3-5 June - Demo central London on Tuesday


IlonaM

Recommended Posts

http://togetheragainsttrump.org.uk/plans-for-the-day/


'National Demonstration: Tuesday 4 June


Assemble 11am at Trafalgar Square, march to Downing Street and then to Parliament Square, creating a Trump-free zone and Carnival of Resistance.


Join the Facebook event for latest updates. Check the Getting There page for coaches to London.


Leaflets are available to pick up from Unite, 128 Theobalds Road, London, WC1X 8TN. It?s also available to download if you can get them printed yourself.'


Leaflet attached as pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand part of Downing Street is being closed off by police, so it won't be possible to get directly to Parliament Square from Trafalgar Square, or vice versa?


ETA: Sorry, obviously I meant Whitehall!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I understand part of Downing Street is being

> closed off by police, so it won't be possible to

> get directly to Parliament Square from Trafalgar

> Square, or vice versa?



There is a petition calling for the police to reverse that decision: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruiter=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=share_petition


More info also at: https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activists-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trafalgar Square is connected to Parliament Square

> Via Whitehall and Parliament Street.

> Downing street is Off of Whitehall and has no

> public access.

>

> they would need to close Whitehall



They would not need to close the whole of Whitehall, Dulwich Fox, and were not intending to.


Not from what I understand, anyway.


ETA: My understanding was that they were going to block off part of the middle so that demonstrators could not gather near the entrance to Downing Street, and also could not walk down Whitehall directly between Trafalgar Square and Parliament Square, but would have to go a longer way round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> to

> > get directly to Parliament Square from

> Trafalgar

> > Square, or vice versa?

>

>

> There is a petition calling for the police to

> reverse that decision:

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

> opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

>

> More info also at:

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/



The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures, from your link???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> IlonaM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I understand part of Downing Street is being

> > > closed off by police, so it won't be possible

> > to

> > > get directly to Parliament Square from

> > Trafalgar

> > > Square, or vice versa?

> >

> >

> > There is a petition calling for the police to

> > reverse that decision:

> >

> https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-p

>

> >

> rotesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june?recruite

>

> >

> r=198717631&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=c

>

> > opylink&utm_campaign=share_petition

> >

> > More info also at:

> >

> https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/london-activi

>

> >

> sts-you-cant-stop-us-from-marching-against-trump/

>

>

> The petition doesn't seem to have any signatures,

> from your link???



Over 70,000!


Try this link: https://www.change.org/p/metropolitan-police-let-protesters-march-against-trump-on-4th-june

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After the USS John McCain fiasco in Japan, I think

> the protesters on Tuesday should carry large

> photos of John McCain!



:)) :)) :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

snoopy17 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No respect.

>

> Why didn't you protest when the royal family had

> dinner with the saudi government?


...Saudi who?

What about boycotting Brunei...?

I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity. ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Presidential plane is in sight over Stanstead

> when Sky News break that the President has just

> tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.


Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan is taking the visit as a great opportunity for electioneering...


And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people obviously supported his policies and are still happy with them. I am not sure where his decision about the transgender people in the military is coming from but that is for them to decide and I dare say the military have reported on the cost of surgeries and treatment and the disruption to service by transgender soldiers and a decision was made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on anything they can to smear Trump- much like the attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all that is the nature of the filthy world of politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Presidential plane is in sight over

> Stanstead

> > when Sky News break that the President has just

> > tweeted that Sadiq Khan is a loser.

>

> Not before Khan was disrespectful to Trump- Khan

> is taking the visit as a great opportunity for

> electioneering...

>

> And in reply to ZT...Trump was elected many people

> obviously supported his policies and are still

> happy with them. I am not sure where his decision

> about the transgender people in the military is

> coming from but that is for them to decide and I

> dare say the military have reported on the cost of

> surgeries and treatment and the disruption to

> service by transgender soldiers and a decision was

> made. I do believe that the democrats will jump on

> anything they can to smear Trump- much like the

> attitude of the far-left in the UK ...after all

> that is the nature of the filthy world of

> politics...and at the end of the day 'we' all love

> an endless supply of cheap labour- it kind of fits

> in with 'I want that and I want it NOW'


Wrong on all counts. You appear to be a Trump supporter and notice the way you slip in your view on transgender and the military. Also your use of the word "filthy". All round depressing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ooo... We shouldn't take things out of context.


Trump openly tweeted:


"Sadiq Khan, who by all accounts has done a terrible job as Mayor of London, has been foolishly 'nasty' to the visiting President of the United States, by far the most important ally of the United Kingdom. He is a stone cold loser who should focus on crime in London, not me.


Kahn reminds me very much of our very dumb and incompetent Mayor of NYC, de Blasio, who has also done a terrible job - only half his height.


In any event, I look forward to being a great friend to the United Kingdom, and am looking very much forward to my visit. Landing now."


I completely agree with him because he's right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snoopy17 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No respect.

> >

> > Why didn't you protest when the royal family

> had

> > dinner with the saudi government?

>

> ...Saudi who?

> What about boycotting Brunei...?

> I do so love selective outrage/moral relativity.

> ;-)



You wont find the far-left boycotting anyone of colour. It wouldn't support their narrative of being anti-racist. :)


Takes me back to a very interesting "debate". This gave me the tickles.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth & reality of the situation is that the UK will be leaving the EU - that is what the majority of Britain voted for. Whilst those who voted remain are busy doing this




or storming the streets like the sore losers that they are, the fact still stands that we are due to leave the EU, so I'm curious to know whether they've been spending any of the past 2 years productively thinking of ways to help themselves.


I take it the far-left are more comfortable with a hard-Brexit than they make out to be, given that they're chasing away our greatest ally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...