Jump to content

Balanced papers/websites/magazines?


TheCat

Recommended Posts

I've often commented on this forum about the lack of balance in most political discussion these days, and the rise of tribalism which hampers rational debate.


Anyway, can the forum recommend any publications which don't overtly lean one political way or the other, and either contain balanced contributions, or at least opposing points of view from both sides of the aisle? Reason being I'm sick of reading the holier than thou Graun, the right wing tabloids aren't an option, the Telegraph I don't mind but again suffers from the same disease as the Guardian but with a different viewpoint.


I know nothing about the various current affairs magazines on offer in the UK...spectator, private eye, new statesman....are any of these of any quality /balanced?


Finally I like reading opinion pieces hence while the BBC is balanced for the most part it doesn't really make me think. Possibly the economist, but that can be a tad dull..I work in finance, so don't need to read a bout it on the weekend!


Genuine question, so genuine responses please (wishful thinking perhaps!)


Any suggestions welcome...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Economist was the first thing that came into my head as I was reading your post, until I got to the bit...

Private Eye is very good if you like political satire. Spec and NS worth a look but I find I only really like certain writers such as Stephen Bush at NS rather than the magazines as a whole. Failing that, Angling Times...


PS. This was an interesting read about trying to cultivate balanced online debate... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-48579597

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Private Eye is a satirical magazine, so not sure what it's doing in your list. (although well worth reading)


Try reading both The Spectator and New Statesman for some right/left balance. Personally I find Spectator more fun but does have a handful of horrible columnists and a fair bit of right wing trolling. The NS is OK but a bit more Guardian like 'Worthiness' in its tone and so a bit duller.


Still think you'll get more balance from these than any of the laughably rubbish in their words ' non MSM' websites - for which Spiked (on the right) and The Canary (on the left) are basically, laughably one sided propoganda sites.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Private Eye is a satirical magazine"


Partly, yes, but have you not read the investigative articles, the stuff at "The Back" and "The City" sections? I would say at least half is proper journalism as opposed to satire. I've been a subscriber for several years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Private Eye is a satirical magazine"

>

> Partly, yes, but have you not read the

> investigative articles, the stuff at "The Back"

> and "The City" sections? I would say at least half

> is proper journalism as opposed to satire. I've

> been a subscriber fro several years now.


'Rotten Boroughs' is pretty accurate too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...