Jump to content

Saturday 19th October 2019 - London - if you're not on march, sign the letter

IlonaM

By IlonaM
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

IlonaM

IlonaM

Posted
Posted

https://www.peoples-vote.uk/let_us_be_heard


Park Lane to Parliament Square, London. 12pm, Saturday 19th October 2019 - London



'We will assemble on Park Lane, in London, on Saturday 19th October at 12 noon. We will then march through the heart of London to Parliament Square, where we will hear speeches from leading cross party politicians and celebrity voices who support a People?s Vote.'



'Why are we marching?


The march from Park Lane to Parliament will deliver a message loud and clear to the Government and MPs that they should trust the people, not Boris Johnson, to solve the Brexit crisis.


It follows a series of packed ?Let Us Be Heard? rallies in towns and cities across the UK this summer where people from all walks of life have demanded the right to a final say on Brexit.


This Brexit crisis has now come down to a simple question about whether we live in a democracy: can we allow Boris Johnson to force No Deal - or another vicious form of Brexit - on our country, without all of us having our voice heard?


The only way to break the deadlock in Parliament, legitimise the outcome and allow us all to talk about something else, is to give the people the final say.


Let Us Be Heard.'






'Saturday 19th October 2019 - London


PEOPLE'S VOTE MARCH - LET US BE HEARD


To avoid major disruption to Great Ormond Street Hospital's huge annual fundraiser we had to move our March to October 19.


This summer, the British people have the chance to force our way back into the final decision on Brexit. We are going on the offensive, with rallies in 15 towns and cities across the country, culminating with an enormous, historic march in London on October 19. Because it is now clear that this is a crisis that cannot be settled by a new prime minister or a deadlocked parliament. It can only be settled by us, the people.


Save the date. And let?s save the country.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dbboy

dbboy

Posted
Posted

It happened on 23rd June 2016.


Are you saying that you don't support democracy and actually want a different outcome, otherwise called another referendum ,because the result of the first referendum can't be stomached? And just remind me how much Parliament has taken notice of you so far, none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sephiroth

Sephiroth

Posted
Posted

Country were told they could have a great, easy deal


I?m willing to believe you couldn?t give a shit and just want no deal uncleglen. But don?t you dare suggest it?s what most of the country voted for because that is straight up bullshit and even you know that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted
This paralysis of government won't be until Oct31 - It'll be for years and years whilst we talk/don't talk to the EU, accept/don't accept a WA/FTA, Negotiate with Trumps people and then possibly find Biden in charge etc etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
keano77

keano77

Posted
Posted

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Easiest way out of this is to turn everyone who

> still want Brexit into Soylent Green as they

> really have no rightful place on the planet.



Silly billy. If I remember soylent Green was based in a dystopian New York. If Remainers think they?ll grow two heads and have teeth like Bugs Bunny if they eat chlorinated chicken I cannot see the dictators of the EU allowing Soylent Green, no matter how cannibalistic your tendencies cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sephiroth

Sephiroth

Posted
Posted

Leavers man


No one is complaining about chlorinated chicken because it will mutate us


It?s because the chlorine is required in USA because welfare standards for animals and workers are so bad. What you are saying is you don?t give a shit about either

Although food poisoning rates are much higher over there too

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

Fully support these people"s right to march for whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the slogan choice? :)


LET US BE HEARD????


This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3 years, I don't think being heard is the problem! Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as 'another' march demanding the same things seems unlikely to yield any different results from the previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fully support these people"s right to march for

> whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> slogan choice? :)

>

> LET US BE HEARD????

>

> This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> years, I don't think being heard is the problem!

> Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> unlikely to yield any different results from the

> previous 6 marches with the exact same message.



You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay people in the 1980s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fully support these people"s right to march for

> > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> > slogan choice? :)

> >

> > LET US BE HEARD????

> >

> > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > years, I don't think being heard is the

> problem!

> > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> > unlikely to yield any different results from

> the

> > previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

>

>

> You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay

> people in the 1980s.


And you remind me of someone unable to accept a crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong with suggesting a different approach to achieve the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle association with something like homophobia. Grow up my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's suppose they did change the headline slogan,

> cue calls from the usual suspects* that they don't

> know what they want, no consistency in message etc

> etc etc...

>

> *Thanks Cat, I've now got all 4 corners in this

> month's Brexit Bingo card...


I think you'll find it actually is a new slogan DR....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JohnL

JohnL

Posted
Posted

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> for

> > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> the

> > > slogan choice? :)

> > >

> > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > >

> > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > problem!

> > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> seems

> > > unlikely to yield any different results from

> > the

> > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> message.

> >

> >

> > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> gay

> > people in the 1980s.

>

> And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle

> association with something like homophobia. Grow

> up my friend.


Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an attempt to be even remainier and louder the more I'm told to shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > TheCat Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> > for

> > > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> > the

> > > > slogan choice? :)

> > > >

> > > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > > >

> > > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in

> 3

> > > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > > problem!

> > > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly?

> as

> > > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> > seems

> > > > unlikely to yield any different results

> from

> > > the

> > > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> > message.

> > >

> > >

> > > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> > gay

> > > people in the 1980s.

> >

> > And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> > crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> > with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> > the same goals?) without resorting to dog

> whistle

> > association with something like homophobia.

> Grow

> > up my friend.

>

> Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an

> attempt to be even remainier and louder the more

> I'm told to shut up.


Good for you. If you actually read my comment as its written, instead of just assuming that in your wisdom you know what I 'really meant', then you'll find I have never said you should shut-up. I wish you the best of luck in your loudness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCat

TheCat

Posted
Posted

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "perhaps if people like you didn't behave like you

> do you'd be accepted more" takes me right back to

> the school playground


Wow, you must have a PhD in 'Strawman theory'. 3 times now you've managed to make a tangential comment to highlight your 'perception' of the injustice of my comments. Rather than actually take as read the comments being made. I'm out. For the second time, best of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
pk

pk

Posted
Posted

to be fair to 'you' you 'wasn't' asked a question with a proper answer in 2016 - leave doesn't mean leave as we can now clearly see


so unless you're saying in 2016 52% voted for the deal that Boris proposes today (they couldn't have) or that 52% really didn't care about any details (which seems clearly to be nonsense) then asking 'is this what you want?' is the only logical step


to stick to a 'brexit means brexit' mantra just makes people look stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • Sue
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By Sue · Posted

      If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • theweekend
      Food poisoning at Dugard & Daughters - twice!

      By theweekend · Posted

      I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • McMurphy
      Charter East Dulwich school

      By McMurphy · Posted

      interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...