Jump to content

Saturday 19th October 2019 - London - if you're not on march, sign the letter


IlonaM

Recommended Posts

https://www.peoples-vote.uk/let_us_be_heard


Park Lane to Parliament Square, London. 12pm, Saturday 19th October 2019 - London



'We will assemble on Park Lane, in London, on Saturday 19th October at 12 noon. We will then march through the heart of London to Parliament Square, where we will hear speeches from leading cross party politicians and celebrity voices who support a People?s Vote.'



'Why are we marching?


The march from Park Lane to Parliament will deliver a message loud and clear to the Government and MPs that they should trust the people, not Boris Johnson, to solve the Brexit crisis.


It follows a series of packed ?Let Us Be Heard? rallies in towns and cities across the UK this summer where people from all walks of life have demanded the right to a final say on Brexit.


This Brexit crisis has now come down to a simple question about whether we live in a democracy: can we allow Boris Johnson to force No Deal - or another vicious form of Brexit - on our country, without all of us having our voice heard?


The only way to break the deadlock in Parliament, legitimise the outcome and allow us all to talk about something else, is to give the people the final say.


Let Us Be Heard.'






'Saturday 19th October 2019 - London


PEOPLE'S VOTE MARCH - LET US BE HEARD


To avoid major disruption to Great Ormond Street Hospital's huge annual fundraiser we had to move our March to October 19.


This summer, the British people have the chance to force our way back into the final decision on Brexit. We are going on the offensive, with rallies in 15 towns and cities across the country, culminating with an enormous, historic march in London on October 19. Because it is now clear that this is a crisis that cannot be settled by a new prime minister or a deadlocked parliament. It can only be settled by us, the people.


Save the date. And let?s save the country.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It happened on 23rd June 2016.


Are you saying that you don't support democracy and actually want a different outcome, otherwise called another referendum ,because the result of the first referendum can't be stomached? And just remind me how much Parliament has taken notice of you so far, none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country were told they could have a great, easy deal


I?m willing to believe you couldn?t give a shit and just want no deal uncleglen. But don?t you dare suggest it?s what most of the country voted for because that is straight up bullshit and even you know that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This paralysis of government won't be until Oct31 - It'll be for years and years whilst we talk/don't talk to the EU, accept/don't accept a WA/FTA, Negotiate with Trumps people and then possibly find Biden in charge etc etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

se22cat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Easiest way out of this is to turn everyone who

> still want Brexit into Soylent Green as they

> really have no rightful place on the planet.



Silly billy. If I remember soylent Green was based in a dystopian New York. If Remainers think they?ll grow two heads and have teeth like Bugs Bunny if they eat chlorinated chicken I cannot see the dictators of the EU allowing Soylent Green, no matter how cannibalistic your tendencies cat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leavers man


No one is complaining about chlorinated chicken because it will mutate us


It?s because the chlorine is required in USA because welfare standards for animals and workers are so bad. What you are saying is you don?t give a shit about either

Although food poisoning rates are much higher over there too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fully support these people"s right to march for whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the slogan choice? :)


LET US BE HEARD????


This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3 years, I don't think being heard is the problem! Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as 'another' march demanding the same things seems unlikely to yield any different results from the previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fully support these people"s right to march for

> whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> slogan choice? :)

>

> LET US BE HEARD????

>

> This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> years, I don't think being heard is the problem!

> Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> unlikely to yield any different results from the

> previous 6 marches with the exact same message.



You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay people in the 1980s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fully support these people"s right to march for

> > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve the

> > slogan choice? :)

> >

> > LET US BE HEARD????

> >

> > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > years, I don't think being heard is the

> problem!

> > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > 'another' march demanding the same things seems

> > unlikely to yield any different results from

> the

> > previous 6 marches with the exact same message.

>

>

> You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about gay

> people in the 1980s.


And you remind me of someone unable to accept a crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong with suggesting a different approach to achieve the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle association with something like homophobia. Grow up my friend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Let's suppose they did change the headline slogan,

> cue calls from the usual suspects* that they don't

> know what they want, no consistency in message etc

> etc etc...

>

> *Thanks Cat, I've now got all 4 corners in this

> month's Brexit Bingo card...


I think you'll find it actually is a new slogan DR....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> for

> > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> the

> > > slogan choice? :)

> > >

> > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > >

> > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in 3

> > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > problem!

> > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly? as

> > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> seems

> > > unlikely to yield any different results from

> > the

> > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> message.

> >

> >

> > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> gay

> > people in the 1980s.

>

> And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> the same goals?) without resorting to dog whistle

> association with something like homophobia. Grow

> up my friend.


Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an attempt to be even remainier and louder the more I'm told to shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JohnL Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > TheCat Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Fully support these people"s right to march

> > for

> > > > whatever they believe...but perhaps improve

> > the

> > > > slogan choice? :)

> > > >

> > > > LET US BE HEARD????

> > > >

> > > > This group of remainers haven't shut-up in

> 3

> > > > years, I don't think being heard is the

> > > problem!

> > > > Maybe adjust message or demands slightly?

> as

> > > > 'another' march demanding the same things

> > seems

> > > > unlikely to yield any different results

> from

> > > the

> > > > previous 6 marches with the exact same

> > message.

> > >

> > >

> > > You remind me of Norman Tebbit talking about

> > gay

> > > people in the 1980s.

> >

> > And you remind me of someone unable to accept a

> > crtical, but constructive, comment (whats wrong

> > with suggesting a different approach to achieve

> > the same goals?) without resorting to dog

> whistle

> > association with something like homophobia.

> Grow

> > up my friend.

>

> Sorry you won't shut me up - I'll actually make an

> attempt to be even remainier and louder the more

> I'm told to shut up.


Good for you. If you actually read my comment as its written, instead of just assuming that in your wisdom you know what I 'really meant', then you'll find I have never said you should shut-up. I wish you the best of luck in your loudness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "perhaps if people like you didn't behave like you

> do you'd be accepted more" takes me right back to

> the school playground


Wow, you must have a PhD in 'Strawman theory'. 3 times now you've managed to make a tangential comment to highlight your 'perception' of the injustice of my comments. Rather than actually take as read the comments being made. I'm out. For the second time, best of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

to be fair to 'you' you 'wasn't' asked a question with a proper answer in 2016 - leave doesn't mean leave as we can now clearly see


so unless you're saying in 2016 52% voted for the deal that Boris proposes today (they couldn't have) or that 52% really didn't care about any details (which seems clearly to be nonsense) then asking 'is this what you want?' is the only logical step


to stick to a 'brexit means brexit' mantra just makes people look stupid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...