Jump to content

Paper receipt not sufficient proof of purchase?


JEG1

Recommended Posts

I bought something in Oliver Bonas yesterday and the sales assistant asked me if I wanted my receipt emailed to me. I declined, but when offered a paper receipt, I said yes please in case I need a refund. The Sales assistant then told me I wouldn?t be eligible for a refund with a paper receipt, only an exchange would be allowed. If however, I had opted for the email receipt, I would have been eligible for the refund. So, I changed my mind and asked to have the receipt emailed to me, but at that point, the sales assistant said it was too late, she?d already pressed the button! I know an email receipt is more environmentally friendly, but I declined having it wrapped in tissue and having a bag to put it in. What about consumer rights? Seems unfair to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your consumer rights are unchanged as regarding the receipt medium. You have absolute rights of refund in specific circumstances (the item being damaged, not fit for purpose etc.). In other circumstances there may option only for an exchange - but not if you have made refund a condition of sale (i.e if you say that you need to check the item's colour for match against something else, and will make the purchase only on the condition that you can get a refund if the colour doesn't match). If that is accepted by the sales assistant (who isn't obliged to accept it) it forms part of the sales contract, although proving and enforcing it (without e.g. a witness to the transaction) may prove more difficult.


Basically, the assistant was talking rubbish - save where a digital receipt would give a refund under any circumstances, rather than just those outlined in law. But that was not made clear to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you simply don't like the item ie you changed your mind then you have no legal rights.


If it is "not of merchantable quality" then you are entitled to a refund within one month or to a repair or replacement after that.


There may be something in their T&Cs which says that if you simply change your mind they will be more co-operative if you have an email receipt. Otherwise your legal rights are unaffected.


when you give your email address for a receipt you can say that you do not wish to receive anything else or to be kept on their database. They should not use the address for marketing to you and if they do you should be able to remove your name from their lists. That's GDPR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's a good idea smiley blue , if you or anyone else comes across petitions to end these despicable acts of cruelty to defenceless animals please put on here or start a new thread if you please so we can sign the petition and add our objections to this , I would also like to thank all of you the people for reading these messages and adding your voices to this cruelty,  maybe we can end it 
    • Malumbu, by that measure are police efforts to cut down on anti-social driving by issuing tickets and fines a token effort as well? Surely punitive measures for cyclists breaking the rules will encourage them not to break the rules again? A bit like when you got stopped and taken into the cab of an HGV. The police are currently using that tactic to show those who break the rules cycling that it might lead them to being hit by a lorry due to the driver's having limited vision - the cycling equivalent of a speed awareness course for drivers.    When they stopped you was it because you had broken a rule or was it just more of an education programme and they asked you to take a look and did it change your cycling behaviour in any way? As I said previously there are those who break the rules on cycling out of ignorance (and those out of arrogance) and I am sure they are using HGVs to educate those in the ignorance category and then hitting those in the arrogance category with the PCNs.    
    • Good that PETA is on it but can we add our voices to the fight against this horrible practice? I’m still shocked! A petition maybe? Happy to raise to the RSPCA but don’t want to duplicate efforts. I’ve signed campaigns from RSPCA before which sends it directly to your councillor
    • Yes, I'm aware of that. I believe the brood was five to begin with. However they are almost adult size now so not the prey of rats any longer. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...