Jump to content

Brexit has Officially become UK Law


DulwichFox

Recommended Posts

Boris Johnson's Brexit deal has officially become UK law, paving the way for the country to leave the EU next week.


THE QUEEN has today given the Brexit Bill Royal Assent, finally passing the UK's withdrawal into law.


Deputy Speaker Nigel Evans announced the news this afternoon in the House of Commons.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Boris Johnson's Brexit deal has officially become

> UK law, paving the way for the country to leave

> the EU next week.

>

> THE QUEEN has today given the Brexit Bill Royal

> Assent, finally passing the UK's withdrawal into

> law.

>

> Deputy Speaker Nigel Evans announced the news this

> afternoon in the House of Commons.

>

> DulwichFox



As though this is a good thing ffs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well aren?t we the lucky ones.

> At least Brexit exposed the right-wing element in

> UK once and for all.

> We know how big it is and how severely corrupted

> people can be through lies and manipulation.


Replace 'right-wing element' with 'rabid champagne socialist ignorant element' then you will be correct....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well aren?t we the lucky ones.

> > At least Brexit exposed the right-wing element

> in

> > UK once and for all.

> > We know how big it is and how severely

> corrupted

> > people can be through lies and manipulation.

>

> Replace 'right-wing element' with 'rabid champagne

> socialist ignorant element' then you will be

> correct....



Perhaps you would like to explain exactly what you mean by "rabid champagne socialist ignorant element"?


I'm particularly interested in your definition of "ignorant", in this context.


Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FreyaMikaelson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The silent majority voted for this. Don't expect

> everybody to be bummed out.



I don't call a third of the electorate or a quarter of the population a majority (silent or otherwise). All the little Englanders have done is set this country up for decades of a bitter divide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before we continue, could we make a minor adjustment to the thread title?


?Small minded little England xenophobes vs ultra privileged metropolitan champagne socialists still banging on about the EU referendum 3 1/2 years later?. Ah that?s better, do continue.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In any event its democracy and, whilst there are doomsters who would like to ignore democracy when it generates the "wrong" result, it's time to let go of despair, drop the pessimism and sign up to moving forward going forward. (or some other phrase).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Boris Johnson's Brexit deal has officially become

> UK law, paving the way for the country to leave

> the EU next week.

>

> THE QUEEN has today given the Brexit Bill Royal

> Assent, finally passing the UK's withdrawal into

> law.

>

> Deputy Speaker Nigel Evans announced the news this

> afternoon in the House of Commons.

>

> DulwichFox


Many people who voted for this with such glee will pop their clogs before time.


Thus leaving the generations behind them scratching their heads.


Enjoy your moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"drop the pessimism and sign up to moving forward going forward. (or some other phrase)."


incorrect - when people face up to the reality of what this entails, then we can start coming together. As long as leavers continue to live in denial there is no hope. What you call pessimism and doom mongering is reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry Elliot Chief Economics Editor of the Guardian no less has been an ardent Brexiteer well before the referendum. If only the left had embraced change rather than burying their heads in the sand we might have been spared this Johnson shambles of entitlement.


Larry Elliott ?The choice is simple: start putting together a post-Brexit progressive project or have a monster sulk and watch the Tories make the political weather.? That was the only choice for Labour post June 2016. They were told. Let?s hope they finally grasp it this time.


https://www.spiked-online.com/2018/10/19/the-establishment-is-trying-to-keep-us-in-the-eu/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Leaving aside we can't even organise a bong to go

> with it, it's highly symbolic that we will be

> leaving the EU at midnight Brussels time, not UK,

> thus immediately becoming a rule-taker not

> rule-maker. Welcome to the future...


Didn't notice this but it's true.


EU rather miserable about signing the document whilst UK Government thinks it's the best thing since sliced bread is ominous to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everything is going to depend on the trade deal. And we won't really know what kind of Brexit we have until those negotiations are finished. For now, nothing changes. But there are signals already from Downing Street that things like maternity leave and holiday pay are going to go. So the predicted attack on workers protections is definitely coming no matter what kind of trade deal we end up getting.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sajid is getting confused


Today

"telling business leaders in Davos that he would not seek to move UK regulations away from those in the EU ?for the sake of divergence?."


Last week

?There will not be alignment, we will not be a rule-taker, we will not be in the single market and we will not be in the customs union.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain Marvel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No one on the edf seems to work so it shouldn't be

> a problem


Or we all do jobs where you're allowed internet access and personal use (every IT job I've worked) :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People seem to be pinning hopes on ?the trade deal?

Boris has ruled out extension - so no trade deal or very bare bones


But even with all the time in the world, uk won?t get a trade deal as good as it has now. It just won?t happen. It doesn?t have the leverage. And other countries won?t have it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People seem to be pinning hopes on ?the trade

> deal?

> Boris has ruled out extension - so no trade deal

> or very bare bones

>

> But even with all the time in the world, uk won?t

> get a trade deal as good as it has now. It just

> won?t happen. It doesn?t have the leverage. And

> other countries won?t have it


This by Ian Dunt is all about trade deals. It may extinguish the hope....


https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2020/01/23/brexit-2020-everything-you-need-to-know-about-johnson-s-trad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...