Jump to content

TFL - end of Bakerloo extension


JohnL

Recommended Posts

They want another bailout


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tfl-second-government-bailout-coronavirus-a4507591.html


"TfL also warned they needed to be ?realistic? about what major future projects will be affordable over the next decade including the proposed DLR extension to Thamesmead, the Bakerloo extension and Crossrail 2."


Rather unsurprisingly the Bakerloo line extension down Old Kent Road is now considered vulnerable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the buck stops with the mayor on this but suspect he will weasel his way out again.


Maybe it's time to realise that a mayor of London and all the associated officers / support staff is just another level of bureaucracy and associated costs that could be put to better use by funding projects and not "middle managers"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Maybe it's time to realise that a mayor of London

> and all the associated officers / support staff is

> just another level of bureaucracy and associated

> costs that could be put to better use by funding

> projects and not "middle managers"


Do you have any figures of the costs saved to support your statement?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope

But if you look at the cost of renting city hall (?11.1 million a year source : https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/24/sadiq-khan-proposes-moving-city-hall-to-east-london-to-cut-costs ) and other factors like mayor and assembly members costs (approx ?1.7 million a year source : https://www.london.gov.uk//about-us/governance-and-spending/spending-money-wisely/salaries-expenses-benefits-and-workforce-information) then add expenses and staff costs then the numbers start to stack up quickly. (Sorry I don't have the time to do all the maths but someone can and I bet it's a fair sum)


Seems an awful lot of money for a set of middle management between local councils and the government possibly with a lot of job replication between at least two of the organisations and makes sense of why the GLA was disbanded in my mind as that money could be put to better use by funding actual projects 😱

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the numbers do stack up when it comes to project funding, those sums won't get you much. Had you pointed the finger at the waste of tax payers' money on mayoral vanity projects e.g. Johnson's Garden Bridge (?53m) then you would have a better argument, but even then that's down to the mayor rather than the office of mayor. There needs to be more accountability when public money is thrown away like that...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right DR that's why I'm saying the role of mayor and the Assembly should be abolished as all mayors have their vanity projects (or cancel others) and the cost of having a mayor and all the supporting staff can't be justified when the money spent on roles, expenses, property could be used (as an example ) to fight knife crime by the police 😃
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The mayor is already responsible for policing and

> knife crime though, as well as tfl.

>

> These are literally 90 per cent of his job remit!


Blimey, he's even a lot more useless than I thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The mayor is already responsible for policing and

> knife crime though, as well as tfl.

>

> These are literally 90 per cent of his job remit!


As Meatloaf sang "two out of three ain't bad" unless, as in this case, the two have been poorly managed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The Bakerloo line extension hasn't been added to the wishlist for funding (CSR submission to government). Kicks the project into the long grass (along with all the other proposed Bakerloo line extensions over the last 100 years I guess)


https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/bakerloo-line-extension-tfl-says-its-not-realistic-to-expect-government-to-fund-extension-soon/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This crisis would have crippled TFL no matter how it was run.


The fact it was already a totally inefficient shambles has made things worse. Maybe as it gets cut to the bone over the next few years, a better TFL will ultimately emerge.


We can hope anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does this forum, which I expect is generally populated by intelligent people, always degrade to a soapbox to throw rocks at the Mayor?


London has one of the best and cheapest public transport networks in the country. In recent times helped by innovation (Oyster, and then contactless), more joined up networks, increased patronage (OK that hasn't survived Covid).


It takes heaps of money, and we are only in this enviable position due to central government subsidy. All the Mayors have made mistakes - Livingstone promising conductors on our buses, 40p/70p outer and inner fares and the silly bendy buses - but boy did he modernise things, Johnson allowing the capital grant to be given up and his expensive and unnecessary new Routemasters, and Khan (see above).


But do you have a good thing to say about the latter or will it just continue to be a whingefest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mrwb Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This crisis would have crippled TFL no matter how

> it was run.

>

> The fact it was already a totally inefficient

> shambles has made things worse.


This is, of course, complete rubbish. TfL gets one of the lowest level of subsidy of any large city's transport networks, and makes most of its money on passenger fares - and yet the passenger fares are still very reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared to where? In the UK it is (or maybe was) disproportionately subsidised by central government. Compared to many big cities in Europe it is less well supported.


Crofton Park to Swanley ?2.90 11 miles in the Oyster Zone

Crofton Park to Eynsford ?7.70 one stop after Swanley, outside the Zone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Compared to where? In the UK it is (or maybe was)

> disproportionately subsidised by central

> government. Compared to many big cities in Europe

> it is less well supported.

>

> Crofton Park to Swanley ?2.90 11 miles in the

> Oyster Zone

> Crofton Park to Eynsford ?7.70 one stop after

> Swanley, outside the Zone


Compared to the tax Londoners and London businesses pay ? I'm sure London subsidises the rest of the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think the concern is the mast being so close to a school as well?
    • There is a planning application to put a mobile phone mast at the top of Dog Kennel Hill.  Residents of Camberwell Grove and their friends in the Camberwell Society are fighting it - defacing their nice conservation area with ugly laminated posters!  They do not benefit from it as reception is fine on their side of the hill. https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=S9IKT2KBN1200 I do not think there are any health hazards from being near phone masts (or at least they are negligible relative to everyday risks we all face).  Anyway, here is what the NHS has to say about them: https://111.wales.nhs.uk/encyclopaedia/m/article/mobilephonesafety/#Risks I imagine this will spark some lively debate!        
    • Hi Laura, Thank you for your interest. I only walk 2 dogs at a time and your mum’s little one will be walking with my own 12 year old  Tibetan/poodle cross(send you her picture) and I charge £20 p/walk, pick up and drop. If it’s from Monday to Friday then we can talk and see what’s best for both of us. Sometimes if the weather is good we can stay at the park a bit longer than a hour…😊 I can only start the walks from Monday April 8th. Thank you, regards  M  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...