Jump to content

Racially motivated internet posts by PJ Carpet Cleaning


binkylilyput

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this is the incorrect section (admin please move if it is) but I thought it really important to get the word out about this individual.


If any of you are members of the East Dulwich Forum, East Dulwich Mums or Nunhead Rocks Facebook pages you will see posts relating to racial abuse and threats from the man behind P J Carpet Cleaning. The person on the receiving end took screenshots of his messages so there is clear proof. Silly billy used his business account to post these nasty messages...? and his posts have also been shared on his business FB page!


I could save the pictures and post on here but I'm not sure that would be allowed (the original posters have given permission to post far a wide though).


P J Carpet Cleaning have a recommendation on this forum, there may be more but I've only done a quick search.


I think this racial abuse should be exposed and named so I have decided to begin this thread. I hope people will take the time to look for themselves and agree that this individual should have his messages shared or at least named.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was disgusted by the screenshots I read alone via EDM {East Dulwich Mums FB page} alone, but according to witnesses, it was even worse than what I'd read; threatening violence against the woman! The woman has done nothing to warrant this type of abuse.


He's a big, bald, knuckle-dragging brute who has not only done this under his own business account, but with one that can be traced to all of his personal details ie. work address/home address. This guy thinks he's untouchable - he's clearly out of touch with reality.


These types of threats need to be reported. He's unstable & should not be approached, let alone invited into your homes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Admin for reinstating this post. I believe it to be very important in the interests of proactively challenging racism and racial abuse, including online.


I have screenshots if forum users think it appropriate to post as I?m aware that folk may not be members of the FB groups mentioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad you agree. I am interested to hear forum user views and hope that the 928 users who have viewed this post are equally as angered by this local business man's racial abuse.


The post was not allowed in the main section unfortunately.


If we stand by and do nothing, we are complicit and racism continues no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think that is what my point is?


I'd say there are far bigger issues at stake here and your comment just side tracks that


TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shall we destroy the businesses of the 924 people

> who havent posted on here, as they are complicit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are indeed very big issues at play, and I don't believe your posts (while well-intentioned) are particularly useful in addressing them.


The person in question (PJ Carpet Cleaning) is unquestionably xenophobic, unquestionably deeply unpleasant (particularly when starting to get threatening), and quite possibly racist.


However...2 points....


Firstly, The woman who made the original post had clearly decided he was talking about 'black' people as soon as he made his original post about 'deportation of all', (despite no evidence that he was at that point). While his comments were obviously xenophobic (i.e. if you're not born in dulwich, then you should be deported), I dont see how they constitute 'racial abuse' (plenty of black people have been born in dulwich, no?). IM not excusing xenophobia, or prejudice, and his/her views are clearly unpleasant, but to trumpet this on multiple internet forums as 'racial abuse', I believe is somewhat misrepresentative.


BUT...i accept that the above is me throwing nuance and caveats into the issue, and in all likelihood, the person being castigated is indeed just a racist....so lets say we agree on that...


Which brings me to my second (and main) point...How is it that destroying his/her business will ensure the racism does not continue? In all likelihood it will make the person even more unpleasant towards 'social justice warriors/snowflakes/BLM/BAME Communities/Immigrants' (or whatever label he/she will associate with the people who ruined his/her business). I don't agree with the zeal with which Tracey has gone straight to 'destruction of the business' as her first instinct, because she believed PJ Carpet Cleaning is racist. Would it not be better to engage this person? Attempt to prove how foolish, ill-informed, and prejudiced these views are through open discussion? I personally think that would be a more constructive solution, rather than trying to use 'hate' to defeat 'hate'...



PS: In anticipation of likely replies - Just because i disagree with how this has been dealt with, does not make me an apologist for racism (which I can see someone on here accusing me of). I'd encourage anyone thinking along those lines to actually read what i've said properly, rather than throw labels out as a kneejerk reaction. If we cant have an actual discussion about this stuff (rather than just silencing or 'destroying' dissenting voices), then we really are f#@ked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so Cat, what is it that you do to 'defeat hate'?

>

> who have you engaged with and proved that their

> views were foolish, ill informed and prejudiced?


So you dont agree with me that PJ Carpet Cleaning's views were "foolish, ill informed and prejudiced"?


odd position to take pk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > so Cat, what is it that you do to 'defeat

> hate'?

> >

> > who have you engaged with and proved that their

> > views were foolish, ill informed and

> prejudiced?

>

> So you dont agree with me that PJ Carpet

> Cleaning's views were "foolish, ill informed and

> prejudiced"?

>

> odd position to take pk.



so you've engaged with PJ and explained that have you?


to be clear the thing that you've made up as being my position is something that you've made up (probably cos you get kicks out of being weirdly provocative on issues of race)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > pk Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > so Cat, what is it that you do to 'defeat

> > hate'?

> > >

> > > who have you engaged with and proved that

> their

> > > views were foolish, ill informed and

> > prejudiced?

> >

> > So you dont agree with me that PJ Carpet

> > Cleaning's views were "foolish, ill informed

> and

> > prejudiced"?

> >

> > odd position to take pk.

>

>

> so you've engaged with PJ and explained that have

> you?

>

> to be clear the thing that you've made up as being

> my position is something that you've made up

> (probably cos you get kicks out of being weirdly

> provocative on issues of race)


As it happens you're the one being provocative today.....


...your suggestion that im being unreasonable by not going out of my way to reach out to PJ carpet cleaning to engage with them on the issue is quite ridiculous. Im engageing on here...thats a start..what are you doing? other that taking pot shots? The proponent on the facebook screenshots was already engaged with him/her....there was the prime opportunity for en gagement, but instead, another route was chosen.


PK....By going down this avenue, you are the one who is distracting from the key issues, and making this about your ongoing vendetta to have a go at me every time i post anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > TheCat Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > pk Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > so Cat, what is it that you do to 'defeat

> > > hate'?

> > > >

> > > > who have you engaged with and proved that

> > their

> > > > views were foolish, ill informed and

> > > prejudiced?

> > >

> > > So you dont agree with me that PJ Carpet

> > > Cleaning's views were "foolish, ill informed

> > and

> > > prejudiced"?

> > >

> > > odd position to take pk.

> >

> >

> > so you've engaged with PJ and explained that

> have

> > you?

> >

> > to be clear the thing that you've made up as

> being

> > my position is something that you've made up

> > (probably cos you get kicks out of being

> weirdly

> > provocative on issues of race)

>

> As it happens you're the one being provocative

> today......I'd be fascinated to hear why you dont

> think those views/comments from PJ Carpet Cleaning

> are a problematic?

>

Please show me where I?ve said that (or implied)


> No....as you well know....I havent engaged with PJ

> carpet cleaning for proof. This is a forum, not a

> court of law. Its my opinion based on what I've

> seen. It seems like (again an opinion) also

> everyone else's view thats posted on this

> thread...so why are you not having a go at them

> for labelling it 'racial abuse' without any

> 'proof'? oh...is it becuased you're once again

> blinded by your desire have a go at me about

> something/anything?


You?re the one going on about engaging not me, but not you don?t seem to be doing it just criticising someone who has


I asked what you do to engage and you have no answer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your original post was poorly worded.


"who have you engaged with and proved that their views were foolish, ill informed and prejudiced?"


That reads like you saying those views weren't all of those things. My Apologies for that accusation.


I now see that you were trying to have a crack at me in a different way to I first thought. But in your true to form style its still rather pathetic, as I've said in my last post above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> your original post was poorly worded.

>

> "who have you engaged with and proved that their

> views were foolish, ill informed and prejudiced??


You said:


?Would it not be better to engage this person? Attempt to prove how foolish, ill-informed, and prejudiced these views are...??


So I ask you how you do that yourself


It?s quite simple

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy seems to be a bona fide Grade A bell-end.


If anyone 'of colour' or 'not' wishes to 'reach out' and engage his carpet cleaning services as a means of drawing him into a lengthy but constructive discussion re prejudice, xenophobia and racism - in order to bring healing to a hurting world .. I wish them well.



I have a Vax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...