Jump to content

Urgent! Petition & call to write to MP ahead of today's vote on Internal Markets Bill


IlonaM

Recommended Posts

Link to petition & write to MP: https://r.ippl.es/mp-international-law/



Please sign the petition and write to your MP 'to stop the government's plans to break international law and pave the way for No Deal Brexit. Tens of thousands of people have supported it so far.


Over the weekend the rebellion in parliament has grown and the government is on the back foot.


Today is the crucial day that the bill will be voted on in parliament.


We need to put as much pressure on MPs today as we can so more of them join the ranks of the rebellion. The government did not expect the level of response there has been on this issue and there is now a possibility they will think again on the plan.


It only takes a minute to email your MP using our new tool ? do it right now ahead of the vote:


https://r.ippl.es/mp-international-law/'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"But Mr Redwood highlighted a proposition in the Protocol that stated: ?Nothing in this Protocol prevents the UK from having unfettered market access for goods moving from Northern Ireland to the rest of the UK?s internal market.?"

From the Daily Express


and


Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has also defended the Government's plans to implement the bill.


Mr Buckland affirmed the bill was just an "insurance policy" if solutions to internal trade could not be reached with the EU.


which of course- given the pig-headedness and utter ridiculous attitude of Barnier- will NEVER be reached. Pathetic desperate Remainer stances all round. AND who cares about the UK reputation on the world stage......most of the world stage has a LOT to do to catch up with the UK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "But Mr Redwood highlighted a proposition in the

> Protocol that stated: ?Nothing in this Protocol

> prevents the UK from having unfettered market

> access for goods moving from Northern Ireland to

> the rest of the UK?s internal market.?"

> From the Daily Express

>

> and

>

> Justice Secretary Robert Buckland has also

> defended the Government's plans to implement the

> bill.

>

> Mr Buckland affirmed the bill was just an

> "insurance policy" if solutions to internal trade

> could not be reached with the EU.

>

> which of course- given the pig-headedness and

> utter ridiculous attitude of Barnier- will NEVER

> be reached. Pathetic desperate Remainer stances

> all round. AND who cares about the UK reputation

> on the world stage......most of the world stage

> has a LOT to do to catch up with the UK.


so in summary Boris is a liar who can't be trusted to deliver what he promised to the EU, to parliament and to the British people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what "Boris promised the British People. " is entirely up to Boris and wether the birtish people believed him


He has no ability to deliver it


Uk has LEFT the EU precisely because it wante dto be sovereign - it just doesn't like what that means


UK has tried to SCAM a new treaty and EU countries are wise to it. The voters of those EU countries and the ELECTED governments of those countries are square behind Barnier. They all understand teh consequences far better than UK does


Grow up and own the mess you created

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Blah blah blah waaah waaah waaah I don?t like democracy and constitutional law or the fact that my hero has f*^%ed up and shown everyone that he didn?t understand the reality of the situation and I think those uppity foreigners should give us good British folk whatever we want because EMPIRE! Whaaaaaagh!



Shhhh, Uncle. The grown-ups are talking. Go and play with your train set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

j.a. Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Blah blah blah waaah waaah waaah I don?t like

> democracy and constitutional law or the fact that

> my hero has f*^%ed up and shown everyone that he

> didn?t understand the reality of the situation and

> I think those uppity foreigners should give us

> good British folk whatever we want because EMPIRE!

> Whaaaaaagh!

>

>

> Shhhh, Uncle. The grown-ups are talking. Go and

> play with your train set.


You might want to listen to some home truths, remaniacs united


Link to comment
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> j.a. Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > uncleglen Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

>

>

> You might want to listen to some home truths,

> remaniacs united

>

>



(TL:DR, there?s a LOT of people who disagree with Homophobe Hoey.)



Ah! Kate Hoey! I mean, why do you make it so easy? Didn?t she vote for the WA? Are you telling me - shock horror! - she didn?t understand it?s implications?! Can?t be! Here?s an actual trade expert pointing out the problem nearly a year ago...




A woman more at home with UKIP than Labour, who told Remain-supporting MP?s in Leave constituencies what they should listen to their voters, but couldn?t square that circle when it came to representing 70% Remain Vauxhall, and jumped before she was pushed when it became apparent she wasn?t going to get re-elected.


She?s a massive homophobe, by the way, amongst other unsavoury attitudes she holds.


Kate Hoey is one of the Irish people who thinks the UK should have primacy over Ireland. She?s just your kind of person! Ah, sweet, you?ve got a crush on someone who just got an unelected position in the House Of Lords because she helped Boris.


Unelected crony?s making laws whom you can?t remove. I could?ve sworn you had a problem with that? Still, when it?s a racist homophobe you like, I guess it?s ok?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thinking about glen?s comments again


I do wonder what it takes to believe the essential Brexit promises of ?we can have all of the good stuff, on our own terms? without ever wondering why 27 other countries wouldn?t say anything other than ?you do what you like love, here are the rules we all abide by?


And to complain when 27 countries unite and explain just that.


For 4 years


Repeating the same truths over and over


And all Brexiters do is say ?we won!!!!!! Project fear!!!?


And when reality looms on the horizon they have the sheer brass neck to say it?s the other lot being belligerent. And to abuse their fellow countrymen who warned them of these consequences

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because they've spent 40 years blaming the EU and literally have no other playbook.


They've never actually analysed the 'how' of extricating the UK from the EU, focusing only on the emotional idea of it. As people are already tired of me pointing out, there's no single description of Brexit that can command a majority, so they focused on the emotional aspect of it, the blind faith necessary to make such a leap without knowing where we will land exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone sane: ?this is what this means. This is what it always meant. This what we have said all along?


Johnson (or whoever replaces him).: ?I can?t say that. I promised the british people blah blah?


Everyone sane: ?never make promises you can?t keep. You got away with it as long as you only had to deal with English people. Everyone else can see thru right thru you. It?s not our fault your success has been built on lies and gullible marks like uncleglen is it. Now be a grown up. You have several options still open to you to safeguard trade and goodwill. Take one of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...