Jump to content

Boots to close Peckham


Louisa

Recommended Posts

I've been told Boots the chemist is planning on closing one of its oldest stores on Rye Lane. Does this mean that we are about to gain a new Boots along LL? I think it would be a shame for all the small independent chemists along with the co-op all of which offer a great service to the community.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't say i agree. The chemists I've been into on

> LL could do with a thorough tidying up and a

> re-vitalised range of products to reflect the fact

> that outside the shop its 2007. IMO.


Try Macey's on Northcross Road. Inside still perhaps nearer the 50's but in a good way - ie service is customer orientated, goods are varied and available and they have those elusive odds & sods that big chains never stock, or only stock bubble wrap packages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I know the chemist you're talking about CWALD, SMG and B. I went in there the other day to ask about a mouthwash that my dentist had recommended that was particularly good for ulcers (not the one that stains your teeth and begins with a C...). I thought the pharmacist was so odd! He completely ignored what I was asking about and pretended not to know which brand I was on about and instead kept thrusting something else into my hand. I'm sure he knows what he's talking about but his manner was very bizarre that I was put off by his sales pitch and didn't buy anything, a sort of panic ensued.


I'd like to think I'd support the local one and not get excited about BOGOFs from Superdrug or Boots but frankly, I do ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boots has been in trouble as a business for some time - a trawl of the Nottingham Evening Post online will reveal just how pesimistic the locals are in its home town.


We all think of it as a chemist but in fact it has a dreadfully unfocused product profile, none of which it is any good at. And its pahrmacy and toiletries business is under attack from corner chemists [better hours] and superdrug. What once made it stand out - it's premium locations - have become a very heavy rental liability.


So it may well be that if Boots have a chance to close a millstone store in Peckham, they'll be glad of it.


UC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Polly D - is the C one bad for staining??? PM me the other one then please ;-)


UC - good shout on Boots. I've been vaguely aware of something not feeling right anytime I've been in during the last year (not often these days as I work in Katherine's Dock) - but you can tell there is a lack of direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes, I know of that chemist this side of LL... Haven't been in there ever since they claimed they'd never heard of Vicks stuff for clearing blocked noses despite it being on the shelf behind them, and me pointing frantically at it. I don't quite understand it, why are they in denial of what we want?!... Very odd indeed...


I do like the one on Northcross Road - good selection of red hair dyes and nice face wash!


Though the Boots in Peckham will always have happy memories for me as a place where I'd buy random crap to build 'sculptures' out of when I went to Camberwell College of Art... But it was a bit of an odd place. Always got lost in there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael Popodopoulous and friends - I don't see why you should "care" so much about Peckham when you don't even live there. What is it to you if there are lots of churches there? Would you be making the same jokes if there were 20 mosques there as well? The people of Peckham are entitled to do what they like, including worship at a church, whether it is evangelical or not.


Sorry if this is off topic, but then again, a chemist in an area which is not even East Dulwich is slightly off topic too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think they make a valid point (although off topic). People in other threads have moaned about the communities not integrating... but maybe this is not surprising when the lynchpin of some communities is so alien to many of us.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parker's Folly - I would reverse the question - why should we NOT care what happens in Peckham? It's right next door to us - many of us visit it or travel through it every day. Many of us have friends there. etc etc


As for the church question - I used to live in E12 where mosques were pletiful - and I would happily make the same joke. You are absolutely correct that people are entitled to do what they wish - but to make a general joke about a proliferation of churches of any denomination is hardly worth getting upset about is it?


Of course, any establishment that exhorts me to "repent" or spend my time in eternal hell will always be the subject of my ire, be it in ED, Peckham or Baltimore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The chemists I've been into on LL could do with a thorough tidying up and a re-vitalised range of products to reflect the fact that outside the shop its 2007. IMO."


OK it's not on LL, but chemist on Northcross Road has quite recently been modernised and seems quite good. The Peckham branch is probably the closest to me if I specifically needed to go to a Boots, but it's not very convenient for me so I go elsewhere. The last time I went there, the Peckham branch of Boots looked as though it needed a fair bit of tidying up and revitalisation too.


Also, I'm not sure Boots would particularly move to ED given that Sainsburys is having another go at running a pharmacy in the DKH store. The last time they tried it was in partnership with Boots, but they failed to get a licence to dispense prescriptions, and their new pharmacy might be hitting the same barrier too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with SeanMac - I think we should "care" what happens in Peckham - East Dulwich is not an island (no matter what the threads about raising water levels might say)


Also disagree that posts about Peckham should be lounged - but that's another matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...