Jump to content

Dangerous Dogs?


ChavWivaLawDegree

Recommended Posts

One of my favourite subjects!! I just spotted this on the Dog Borstal guy's website and I have to share this cos it's spot on. All I have to add, Mic Martin is, stand yourself, take the politician's place and scrap stupid laws like these!


"Dangerous Dogs


My statement


A few years ago while on a research trip at a dog training school in America where at least 6 dogs in twenty were Pit Bulls I came home with a totally different outlook on the breed, the guys were into sports like weight pulling, agility and obedience.


While I was there I also did some training at the local Gun Club, I had been trained as a Police Firearms Officer but there I was able to train and get a better understanding of different types of weapon.


In Britain today we basically have one rule if something bad happens lets ban everything associated with it.


For example something tragic like a Numb-nut going on the rampage with a gun, let?s ban all the responsible Gun Clubs and shooting clubs.


Some dick heads play at being hard with their dogs so we ban an entire breed.


Banning hand guns certainly made a difference to the gun crime, did it f**k Police Officers are still being shot and killed. Not I hasten to say by the Olympic small arms club, by Criminals.


Statement: The Dangerous Dogs Act made a massive difference to Dog Attacks. Did it?


When the law came in I worked it, I had to enforce it, not some politician that wouldn't know the arse end of dog from the biting end. I was one of the first members of the Police Dangerous Dogs Team, we would assist in the capture of Dangerous Dogs or offenders using dogs as weapons against the Police, we shot some and captured some but most just went on a lead and were honestly a lot more frightened of us than we were of them. What happened they all got put down, because they were dangerous? Not really, because they had the misfortune to have a F***ing idiot as an owner.


For every irresponsible Labrador, Chihuahua, Collie owner, I will show you a responsible bullbreed owner it?s not the BREED it?s the OWNER.


And Criminals still run puppy farms and they still control dog fights in Manchester Birmingham and London and they still have guns.


Politicians: Those little brainy kids I hated at school, the sort that couldn't kick a ball straight, had no real idea of what was happening around them.


They grew up...... and now we've put them in charge.


They still don't know what's happening around them, not one of them a natural leader, just good at paperwork.


MM"


His website link http://www.micmartin.co.uk/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed Mr Bob, perhaps because the Reiki healers were "open" to it!


This is one of my favourite lines from his super smart web site;


"your all equal here, unless you use a flexi lead or turn up in a body warmer, brand new green wellies, and immaculate Barbour jacket, or any of that old S***, so come and have some fun..."


OHMYGOD, I really feel quite sick from laughing...


He is simply the warmest and least judgemental of individuals. I simply must purchase a Pit Bull in order to become one of his gang!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair I think you will find that severe organ damage caused by supersonic passage of hot lead is what does the killing. It is a bit unfair to go blaming it all on the gun now isn?t it?


And well, Pit bulls. It is all up to the owners isn?t it? Some irresponsible people raise Jack Russels badly and they end up ripping up the furniture. Can?t blame the dog it?s the owner. Same as some people raise American Put Bulls badly. You certainly can?t blame the dog for killing a small child now can you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

over goose green today some oik let his nasty brute of a dog free in the the dog-free part of the park. A woman walking by tried to point out that it was the dog free zone. He basically told her to mind her own. The signs showimg that it is dog-free are down. That dog ran around like a mad-thing barking and snarling at other dogs and people.


Wanted to shout "oi, get that pig out of there" I would, of course, have been shouting it at the dog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> over goose green today some oik let his nasty

> brute of a dog free in the the dog-free part of

> the park. A woman walking by tried to point out

> that it was the dog free zone. He basically told

> her to mind her own. The signs showimg that it is

> dog-free are down. That dog ran around like a

> mad-thing barking and snarling at other dogs and

> people.



I have to say I am a bit confused by this post


The bit in red says the dog was in the dog free area (not confused yet)


The bit in blue says it was barking and snarling at other dogs (now confused)


was there more then one dog in the dog free section? (looking for clarification now)


This thread is almost as much fun as the Nunhead and Peckham Rye Community council meeting a few months back when the issue of the council imposing a blanket "Dogs on leads in parks" order was brought up... now that was a lively debate !!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...