Jump to content

Testing for CV-19? Private or NHS.


Seabag

Recommended Posts

How do you go about getting tested for Covid-19 if it?s at all possible? I feel well with none of the symptoms described.


But, I?m in a vulnerable group and so is my partner (it?s hard to actually admit this to yourself I find, but we are), I?m asthmatic and my partner is pregnant, our baby is due in 2 weeks.


We?ve been self-isolating carefully down in our place in Kent, my son has moved into my flat in E.D on his own, as he?s also asthmatic and wants to be cautious not to be at his Mums house where other siblings live too.


I?d pay if that?s what it takes, I don?t want to burden an already under pressure NHS if that was the case. But I do want to know if I?m clear or have had the virus.


Is that possible, has anyone done this ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally would leave available test kits for those who need them most. Work is ongoing to develop a test that looks for antibodies, which is an easier thing to test for and results can be processed more quickly. That will be used to test for those who may have had the virus and now have some level of immunity (although caution on that as any viral mutation brings us back to square one). So unless you develop clear and obvious symptoms, I would wait for that to become available.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to the above, the Dr who spoke on the Nolan Show (Well worth a listen) https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p0877mb2

was saying that they had people test negative on nose swabs but positive on throat swabs and there are false negatives etc. You wouldn't be likely to get a reliable result I'm afraid.

I'm also keen to be tested as was ill this week and will always be left wondering whether it was that. We have all rigidly self-isolated as if it were but it would be useful to know for sure... hopefully the antibody test will come out soon.


Edit to correct an autocorrect typo I'll for ill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone in high risk groups has to follow government advice and simply be scrupulous about avoiding contact. If you can get friends to deliver food etc... that is the way to go.


As already stated, testing is not an exact science but in my view any tests should be reserved for health workers in hospitals. I think it is bordering on immoral that anyone can purchase a test if they have enough money. We are all in the same boat. Some of us, including me, have close family in the very highest risk group and we are not pursuing testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was able to sit it out and stay at home, I would. But I?m cautious about going to hospital with my partner and not knowing, I?d hate to have it, showing no symptoms and then finding out i?m a carrier spreading the virus unwittingly. Worse still, give it to our newborn.


Does anyone know if they routinely test people going into hospital?


Sure I want tests to go to front line staff, health workers and such likes. But are we that low on supplies that purchase the test will make a material difference?


I?m open to conversation, but please withhold judgement on morality on this one. I?m not wealthy, but if spending money elsewhere alleviates pressure on the NHS, then I?ll consider it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand your dilemma Seabag. My sense is we are low on testing kits period. So there should not really be a separate batch for private use unless these are surplus to requirements within the NHS. In short, private health resources should all be made available to those with greatest need which has to be frontline NHS staff and suspected serious covid19 cases, where testing best directs treatment. I may be wrong. Those who know more may be able to elaborate.


It is very difficult territory I wish you well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Seabag. The NHS are not just judging what they need now, but what they will need when the numbers needing treatment shoot up. It is a race to get everything needed in place. Anyone admitted to hospital suspected of having the virus is tested for it though.


Even if you are not a carrier of the virus who is asymptomatic, until we have an effective treatment or vaccine, the advice would be the same. Only making journeys that are necessary and social distancing.


You are not going to be the only person who is thinking about purchasing a test, so encouraging that as a course of action is going to have an impact on kits available for front line workers. The government has already requisitioned private healthcare services for the moment that NHS facilities become filled to capacity.


Try and look at it this way. The more we all do not panic and follow advice, the more likely we are to stay well, and the more likely the treatment we need will be available if we or anyone in our family becomes unwell enough to need hospital treatment.


It sounds to me as though you are doing all the right things already. Try not to worry too much. This is going to be a difficult time for lots of people, so you are not alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has been some evidence of scam private tests,or tests sold at 300% mark-ups. The 'solution' to your problem will be the anti-body test now being developed which will determine whether you have been infected by looking for Corvid-19 anti-bodies in your system.


There is no evidence that the pregnant are at risk, this is just precautionary - and those most likely to be at risk (based on the fact that the virus is so new) are those in early term pregnancy - no one has yet gone through to term having risked early infection! This is merely a worst case scenario.


If you have no symptoms - great - stay as isolated as you can if you are worried and carry on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something useful on Five Live about assessing relative asthma risks (today 18:45).


Say you even DID test now and were negative that's only now. As much as many of us would like to know if we've been exposed that's not the priority. There should be no private tests available IMO.


Hope you can try to relax at least a bit and enjoy the last weeks of pregnancy/first days and weeks together as a family. Obviously worrying times for you all but with the prospect of joy soon!


HP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We?re in a calmer position right now, but I admit it has been challenging. We had an appointment at Penbury hospital in Kent a couple of days ago, they asked how we we?re feeling and gave us a chance to chat through the situation.They we?re very reassuring on the measures and the risks being taken. They talked us through their CV19 protocol and procedures and many other things, we left feeling way better and with an enhanced feeling of admiration for the NHS staff.


I wouldn?t on reflection take a private test even if it were available, but I would like to know in the future if we?ve had the infection and we?re showing antibodies, like many others would too. I?ve also had correspondence with a NHS consultant which has been reassuring and helpful with advice on asthma and staying well.


In short I don?t regret asking these questions, it?s been helpful to explore what?s possible and what informed people have to say. It?s all gone a long way to making the best of this situation we find ourselves in.


Lastly a nod to the Forum creators, it?s a wonderful thing and thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if the rest of the Royal household has also been tested? Including the younger ones. I bet we will never know.


And your medical details, tests and results of tests are readily available to the inquisitive public, are they Louisa? And I imagine you mean the Royal Family, not the Royal Household - which includes grooms and maids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder if the rest of the Royal household has

> also been tested? Including the younger ones. I

> bet we will never know.

>



Why on earth would you or anybody else want to know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mostly because it?s interesting to know how ordinary at risk NHS workers are struggling to be tested on the frontline, putting themselves at risk every day, whilst the heir to the throne seems to have be able to be tested? Hence why I think it?s in the public interest to know how many others in the royal household manage to be tested at this time.


My medical details are not relevant to the public interest, but the royal households accessibility to testing IS.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whilst the heir to the throne seems to have be able to be tested?


Prince Charles is over 70 and was presenting symptoms - he is in a risk group (and the people he might regularly see, including the Head of State definitely are) - so testing isn't abnormal in these circumstances. I would also expect the (much younger) PM to have access to Covid testing as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loutwo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mostly because it?s interesting to know how

> ordinary at risk NHS workers are struggling to be

> tested on the frontline, putting themselves at

> risk every day, whilst the heir to the throne

> seems to have be able to be tested? Hence why I

> think it?s in the public interest to know how many

> others in the royal household manage to be tested

> at this time.

>

> My medical details are not relevant to the public

> interest, but the royal households accessibility

> to testing IS.

>

> Louisa.


Dear God. You can't even wind your neck in during a global pandemic.


You really are a vile specimen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I've learned from this thread that over 70's are apparently "entitled" to be tested. The reality appears to be that testing has ceased from what is broadcast on the news.


The Royal's are likely to have all been tested as Charles has the symptoms, and what else was Andrew tested for? But that's a separate thread in it's own right.


What is apparent, is that it's very much a them and us society, (but always has been that way) a bit like the monty python sketch of three blokes all looking down on each other and the third looking up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

----you can't even wind your neck in during

> a global pandemic.

>

> You really are a vile specimen."


Ive reported your post for vile and cowardly bullying.


Penguin: your post is completely wrong.

"There is no evidence that the pregnant are at risk, this is just precautionary - and those most likely to be at risk (based on the fact that the virus is so new) are those in early term pregnancy - no one has yet gone through to term having risked early infection! This is merely a worst case scenario. "


We know pregnant women ARE more at risk of viral infections in pregnancy as their immune system is already suppressed to support the growth of the baby. The evidence is that women in the LAST few months of their pregnancy are MOST at risk of contracting the virus. I don't actually understand the last part of your sentence "no one...early infection" so I can't comment on that, but please only post information that you are sure of, as in the current climate posting incorrect information about the risks the virus poses to pregnant women could be dangerous. For more information please check out the RCOG website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Plenty for sale online from various ticket vendors but you'll need to part with £250 and upwards by the looks of it. Out of interest i kept an eye on the prices for the England and Italy Euro final. At one point they were on offer for a couple of grand each. On the day sellers were obviously getting itchy feet and prices dropped somewhat but never went any lower than £400. That was a few hours before kick off. There was plenty still available half an hour before kick off.   Having been to Wembley a couple of times for play off finals i found it to be not a great place to watch football. Sat three rows back from the pitch side advertising hoardings for one game and way way up in the gods for the other. We felt to far away from the pitch on both occasions. Up in the goods was just stupid because we felt cut off as well.  I don't think it was rebuilt with acoustics in mind either. Even with most of our 25k fans singing it never sounded loud because it's pretty much uncovered and too open.   Happy hunting!
    • It doesn't work as a commercial venture.  Bit churlish to say I told you so.  I told you so.  I'll send less greetings cards.  What pees me off is international postage where you can no longer send light letters at 10 grammes, normal ones up to 20g, now all at the much more expensive 100 g  Didn't we vote to take back control and price everything according to irrational units like ounces? That's some obscure humour btw   
    • Available from Monday April 8th 2024, 2on2Walkies take pride in doggie care and only walk 2 furry friends at a time. I make sure that they get plenty of doggie interaction and socialisation in the park as well as making friends. Back home happy and tired I always check that the water bowl has fresh water and always make sure the doggie is left comfortable before I leave. I'm fully insured and have a couple of slots available for local walks to either Peckham Rye Park or Dulwich Park.  Thank you!  
    • Why would they only send them recorded delivery? I used the signed for option yesterday.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...