Jump to content

Southwark Council parking "shop"


Pierre

Recommended Posts

I fully admit to not paying enough attention while driving and contravening the No Entry sign at the South end of Rye Lane where you're supposed to turn left and follow a lengthy one way system. I won't dispute it.


What currently enrages me is the way Southwark Council treat parking and traffic offences as revenue-generating enterprises in such a blatant way as to call their payment office the "Parking Shop". I'm further wound up because "We are sorry but your card details cannot be processed at this time." when trying to pay online (by adding the penalty charge to my "shopping basket" for pity's sake!) and their customer service number seems to be permanently engaged.


Perhaps everyone else has received wonderfully smooth service and is pleased to donate to Southwark Council in this way; maybe it's just me...



: P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Pierre, it's not just you their service is terrible and the whole 'shop' and 'customer' logic is so out of place as to be insulting. I can hear the discussion in the council now 'fines office is too realistic, we need a softer more likeable name. Let's call it a 'shop' and our mugs 'customers' will be happier', er except you're fining ?50-?100 a time for doing tiny little things wrong. Blood boils etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I agree that the whole "shop" thing is wrong it is only car drivers (and again I AM one so bear with me) who bleat about "only doing tiny things wrong"


As the Tindersticks sang .. "tiny tears make up an ocean.."


The reason motorists are so targeted is because there are so many of us - TOO many... parking on a yellow line is only a tiny thing and wouldn't have been that much of an issue even 10 years ago - but these days so many of us do it it has major repercussions -


I drive but am not being milked for cash by any council - because I know the score and make sure I don't do anything wrong - is it THAT difficult??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point; as I said, I'm not complaining because I did something wrong. I failed to notice a no entry (except local buses and cycles) sign on a route that I cycle through almost every day. I don't dispute that my tiny misdemeanour needs to be discouraged or everyone would do it.


My point was born of the frustration I felt at being treated more like a "customer" than a punished law-breaker, how much like buying books on Amazon it was, yet how awkward they make it actually to make a payment.


I'd never had a parking ticket or fine until I moved to ED. Now I've had two in the space of a year (one successfully contested, they burned the feeble remainder of the yellow lines off the road a week later). I'm ashamed.



: P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...