Jump to content

New builds in ED (Tribeca + another): thoughts?


Recommended Posts

I understand this was briefly discussed a few months back, but not since then (apologies if I may have missed more recent discussions).


AFAIK they're building two new developments in the area: one is the so-called Tribeca, by the gym on Crystal palace road, and the other is literally next to the ED station - there will be a M&S simply food on the ground floor.


Has anyone been in touch with the estate agent?

Thoughts on the two developments?


I saw ads of one-bed flats for ?475k at both. I understand new builds tend to cost a bit more, but that seems ridiculous. My benchmark is ? 480 to 550k for 2-bed flats, e.g. I have seen ads of decent 2-bed flats, with communal garden and parking space, in Hayes Grove (a few metres from the ED station) for ?530. That's the asking price - what they really sell for I don't know.


Plus, while the Tribeca should at least have some communal green space, the other one is so close to the station -literally next to it - you can probably hear the announcements. Maybe I'm stingy, but I know I'd want a discount to tolerate noise from the station!


It will be interesting to see if/when/how these units sell. I have seen other properties (not newbuilds) being discounted by 20% and still not selling. I imagine that, at the end of the day, with newbuilds it will all be driven by the kind of financing developers have in place, and therefore how low they can bear to sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have thought noise generated from East Dulwich station would be too much of a problem, doors are not slammed shut and the trains themselves are quiet. With double glazing it would all be very muffled. Some would in fact see being in such close proximity to the station as a selling point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ED station isn't too bad because AFAIK all the trains that pass by stop there, so if you're next to the station they will be either accelerating or decelerating, ie slow either way. Plus being close to the new Charter secondary will be a plus for many.

I have seen properties next to stations on the Clapham Junction to Croydon line, and those tend to be cheaper because they're much noisier from all the fast trains speeding by without stopping.


However, this new build is literally next to the station, so there is a chance of hearing all the announcements.


Oh, well, it's a free world, if others want to pay close to half a million for a one-bed there, it's their right! :)


Also, asking price doesn't necessarily mean sale price!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Back to the Tribeca I'd be interested to know how many have actually sold? Of the 20+ units there were a hew under offer when this thread was started as I remember it, I think one house and three flats. And one flat had exchanged. I think there'd been a screw up on the houses which had been marketed as freehold but turned out to be leasehold (after exchange) and this was down to their being built on top of the car park which sits under the majority of the site. The flats were all leasehold and looked very pricey but still sellable, then apparently the developers/development went into receivership. Presumably it was all sorted as some of the units are still for sale.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's just slow times in the property market. Too much uncertainty. There are some perfectly good Victorian houses in ED and PR that have been on the market for absolutely ages... just not enough people willing to buy at the moment, with a stagnant economy, foreign investment slowing, cutbacks in The City, and Brexit looming over us like a dodgy uncle.


I'm quite keen on the Tribeca development (despite the daft name)... IMO it's a nice looking building. Was just built at the worst possible time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> For a while now the scaffolding has returned over

> the whole of the flats so presumably something

> needs correcting or maybe not properly finished if

> the original developers went into receivership.

> Just looks very shoddy.


We've got scaffolding over Co-Op because our cladding is being replaced as it was marked up as not meeting the new demands.


I think it's similar for a lot of flats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
    • Another recommendation here for Jason.  He came to plaster over a section of ceiling that we had to remove in order to investigate a leak.  He is a really lovely guy, easy to get in touch with and great communication.  He was quick, tidy and competitively priced.  Very happy and I'd have no hesitation in recommending him to anyone.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...