Jump to content

Overhill/Belvoir/Underhill roads being used as a bypass


bobbsy

Recommended Posts

Coming home last night, 7 ish, it was a constant stream of traffic turning from Lordship Lane into Overhill, then down Belvoir, and then onto Underhill. A large green Clarkes coach was trying to turn onto Underhill as I passed, slowly, as it's a difficult turn for a vehicle of that size with parked cars - surely these small side roads are not designed to handle vehicles of this size?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't share your optimism Sidhue .


And a more permanent fix is planned from mid Feb to early March .


SE22: LONDON ROAD

What we are doing

We are replacing a water main on LONDON ROAD as part of our mains replacement programme.


Start Date

16 February 2019

End Date

9 March 2019

Days per week on site

We are currently working here 5 day(s) per week.


https://inyourarea.thameswater.co.uk/issue?id=I586


and is the gusher on Forest Hill Rd near Brenchley Gardens really all fixed as TW online seem to think ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@intexas, the bus status said it should be sorted on Sunday but I hadn't checked the Thames Water. As far as I know, the official diversions don't go around the back streets but you can't plan for sat navs, which usually take the shortest route when you click the "avoid road block" button. You would expect Clarks et al to have dedicated HGV satnav though.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not ideal, but can't be helped I suppose, took me 15 minutes just to get my car out of the space I parked it in outside our flat on underhill yesterday it was bumper to bumper traffic... did notice a parked car had the corner of its bumper knocked off further down, and one wing mirror on another a few metres further... some of the drivers are quite belligerent when it comes to giving way when having to pass parked cars, especially where the p13 is concerned.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't share your optimism Sidhue .

>


???


Not me I think. And yes, the long closure is going to be a PITA. But on balance if it fixes the 3/4 times a year the main bursts and our water gets cut off, I can live with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Residents on Melford Rd, and our fellow sufferers on Wood Vale were already complaining to councillors about the increase in traffic over the last few years, especiallly HGVs, coaches and vans of all sizes-(thank you sat nav,) but since the Great Thames Water Disaster, it's even worse, and as you say, the behaviour of some drivers is appalling!

We held a meeting in January attended by 2 councillors, for anyone concerned by this, and even on the snowiest coldest night, 16 people turned up!

We are hoping to have a Community Council Meeting about this increase in traffic avoiding the main roads, using small side streets that aren't appropriate for such large and heavy vehicles, usually at speed.

Send me a pm if you're interested and I'll keep you posted on any updates plus the C.C.meeting date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I live directly on LL so the past few days with (almost) no traffic has been a huge relief:)


I totally agree re: drivers behaviour. Slightly different angle here as I was watching what happens when such a busy road is closed. Drivers jumping out of their cars and moving the fences so they can drive through (!), driving on the pavements next to the people walking (!), shouting, honking, swearing etc. Must say the biggest idiots and worst behaved drivers are those on motorbikes - there are simply no words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ab29 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I live directly on LL so the past few days with

> (almost) no traffic has been a huge relief:)

>

> I totally agree re: drivers behaviour. Slightly

> different angle here as I was watching what

> happens when such a busy road is closed. Drivers

> jumping out of their cars and moving the fences so

> they can drive through (!), driving on the

> pavements next to the people walking (!),

> shouting, honking, swearing etc. Must say the

> biggest idiots and worst behaved drivers are those

> on motorbikes - there are simply no words.


I walked along the closed part of LL on Tuesday afternoon coming back from Forest Hill and there was a complete idiot on a scooter who narrowly missed me as he then rode on the pavement where the fencing is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ampersand Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m wondering how many of these people whining

> about traffic on back streets own a car.


I?m more whining about the length of time this is taking to fix and the hassle of multi-stop walks. The increased traffic hasn?t bothered me other than irate tooting. But no, I don?t own a car. Does that mean I?m allowed to whine? 😂


I?m wondering how many of those making light of the situation have been even remotely affected?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've had to change my plans quite a bit, which I found surprising, using Honor Oak Park station which is taking over 20 mins on the P4 to get to. So bad that on Friday afternoon I spent silly money on a cab home from the West End. Also looks like I'll be cabbing it to Penge on Monday purely as I can't expect my elderly mother to go to HOP on a train to Penge West. (She can't walk to Forest Hill).


Even a trip to Sainsbury's at DKH is becoming a mission with only the P13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I?m wondering how many of those making light of

> the situation have been even remotely affected?


I live at the Lordship Lane end of Underhill Road and take either the 363 or P4 to work so yes, quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...