Jump to content

Noise from Goodrich


Recommended Posts

Totally agree its doing my head in!!!! Ridiculous sized lorries with trailers, skips flinging their vehicles around smashing chains together etc! I thought ridiculous SUVs were bad enough (not noise, ridiculous size for an ancient city!)All the dust in the air. I really feel for mums and dads with young babies!!!

I am positive the weight of old curbs, tarmac etc sent crashing into lorries or dropped are damaging all our properties. You can really feel the tremors!!These are very old structures and our homes!!! Was even worse on Tuesday when the rubbish collection guys were around with their very Noisey vehicles, speeding around. Eco friendly huh? What a combination!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

muser Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Totally agree its doing my head in!!!! Ridiculous

> sized lorries with trailers, skips flinging their

> vehicles around smashing chains together etc! I

> thought ridiculous SUVs were bad enough (not

> noise, ridiculous size for an ancient city!)All

> the dust in the air. I really feel for mums and

> dads with young babies!!!

> I am positive the weight of old curbs, tarmac etc

> sent crashing into lorries or dropped are damaging

> all our properties. You can really feel the

> tremors!!These are very old structures and our

> homes!!! Was even worse on Tuesday when the

> rubbish collection guys were around with their

> very Noisey vehicles, speeding around. Eco

> friendly huh? What a combination!!



Whaaa???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whaaaaaa????? INDEED! DOH! WHOOPS! SORRIES!!!! Sorry Goodrich school, children, teachers, parents, residents et al.....As soon as I saw the words 'NOISE and GOODRICH" I saw RED!!! Having been affected by the 'pavement replacement, experience!Dust storms and real earth tremors , loud bangs! I just got carried away! Nothing to do with the school at all. Doh!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People ought to stop having children - noisy, dirty, entitled, sweet munchers who stop me driving my car as fast as I want to and have a right to do after paying my taxes!


Do these ?children? actually pay taxes?


Of course not!


These small scale outsiders seem to be more and more common on East Dulwich residential avenues - surely there must be something local councillors should be doing to limit the number of children before East Dulwich is overwhelmed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I was just about to congratulate Goodrich school on the recent dramatic reduction in noise levels associated with poorly supervised children in the outside areas of the school, running and jumping at will, when I realised that the cause of the noise reduction may well be the excessive holidays that staff and children are now enjoying.


Doubtless the running, jumping and general Tomfoolery will now simply be transferred to our local parks which simply do not have the capacity to absorb thousands of poorly supervised young hooligans.


It strikes me though that local councillors, here to help us,should take careful note if the improvement to East Dulwich ambience the school closure has achieved and give urgent consideration to educating these young people at secure residential accommodation a reasonable distance from East Dulwich - possibly up north!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps you?re not getting the point. The event is ?Goodrich Rocks? (which I used to attend being an ex-pupil!) and was held on a weekend. I live on Hillcourt and the noise levels from their speakers was RIDICULOUS. There was absolutely no reason for the speakers to be turned up as loud as they were.


Your smartass, sarcastic comments aren?t amusing green ranger. The noise was inexcusably excessive and seemed to last for hours on end.

Stop being a prick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow well I?m now subjected to abuse for being ?smartass and sarcastic? because you want to object to noise from a fun primary school event on ONE day of the year.


Precisely the sort of petty middle-class, nimby, boring, intolerant attitude that risks East Dulwich being transformed into a dire place to live.


If you can?t get joy out of young children enjoying themselves then take your bitter attitude and move somewhere else ....would be what many people would be thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Calling someone a slang word for a paedophile because they support a one day school fundraiser a bit extreme no?


Ronnijade Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m working class for one, don?t put me in the

> same category as the majority of the ED mob LMAO.

> @#$%& off you soul sucking nonce. xxx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let?s not forget all this started because Mr Ronnijade wanted to mark his annoyance at a local

Primary school holding its annual money-raising kids? concert and general fun occasion, at a weekend and finishing by 7pm.


Having been challenged, Mr Ronnijade then resorts to accusing someone sticking up for the rights of young children to have a bit of fun, while raising money for charity, of being motivated by being a paedophile.


What could be the reason behind Mr Ronnijade?s bizarre behaviour?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Ronnijade but it was you used the word "nonce". Nobody else can change your posts - only you can.


I would suggest that it would be in your best interests for you to apologise to the poster that you insulted or you might find yourself on the wrong end of a writ. Insult me like you have insulted everybody else, but when you're in a hole you should stop digging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...