Jump to content

Best Chinese restaurant?


apbremer

Recommended Posts

Yeah Silk road for Xinjiang style food. (not sure if it's Uyghur-specific or not, as they do have pork on the menu, but it seems geographically correct).


Wulli Wulli is OK, the Szechuan section is small but it's not bad at all. The rest of the Anglo-Cantonese type menu is fine, for that type of food.


Hong Kong City dim sum is not bad at all, if you've ever had dim sum in Chinatown then it is basically the same thing. I think in the evening they do fixed-priced all-you-can-eat menus, but I've never tried it... it might be fine, I have no idea.. lots of onions, one imagines.


Wagamama is not really Chinese... it's more sort of Japanese-ish with a handful of pan-Asian type dishes. I don't even think they have any branches in south London. FWIW I think it's nothing special, but it is consistent... if you find yourself in a shopping mall or a random high street, it's a pretty safe bet. They deserve credit for bringing katsu curry to the masses, although it should really be pork...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^I don't like Wagamama either


Dragon Castle on top end of Walworth Road was also ok for Dim Sum although haven't been there for ages.


Are there many great Chinese places though outside of central London? IME they all tend to be generically bland and aimed at British palates.

Some good vietnamese places here and there though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RyeRambler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't overlook 148 on Lordship Lane. Ive only been

> twice but thought the food was excellent and good

> value. In town i think Phoenix Palace baker street

> has the best food. Hakkasan also has good food but

> place is a bit wanky



Where is 148 on Lordship Lane?


Wuli Wuli is OK.


Not keen on Wagamama (though as said above it isn't Chinese). I think it's gone way downhill since its early days ( but I haven't been there for years, so maybe it has gone uphill again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 148 Chinese is the old Mr liu restaurant.


I?ve been a few times. There?s some fresh veg dishes done well here. I like the crispy seafood noodles.


It?s run by a guy who used to work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is quite similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

148 Chinese


148 Lordship Ln, London SE22 8HB

Hours:

Thursday 5:30?10:30pm

Friday 5:30?11pm

Saturday 12?2:30pm, 5:30?11pm

Sunday 12?2:30pm, 5:30?10pm

Monday Closed

Tuesday 5:30?10:30pm

Wednesday 5:30?10:30pm


Phone: 020 8693 8266




I used to use Mr Liu (which stayed open late) because of its proximity to my house.

Food would still be hot when I got home. They were really friendly.


148 Chinese closes early. 10.30 on week days.

You need to get there earlier to place any order for Take Away


Too early if you have been to the Pub and want a late Chinese meal.


Eta:

Did try it once. The food was poor. not as good as Mr Liu was previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satellite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is

> quite similar."

>

> Cheap and full of MSG then?



Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a bit of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along with ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it, no?


The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong Kong style of Chinese restaurant.


And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them. But I like 148, they try hard and make some nice dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the premises.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beulah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dragon Castle on top end of Walworth Road was also

> ok for Dim Sum although haven't been there for

> ages


Yeah. I've not been for ages either... TBH mainly because we find Hong Kong City easier to get to. But it used to be quite good. I believe they actually had a dim sum chef making many of the items himself (usually dim sum is bought in), but not sure if it's still the case or not.


If you want dim sum that's a bit fancy... A Wong in Victoria is quite something..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Satellite Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food is

> > quite similar."

> >

> > Cheap and full of MSG then?

>

>

> Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a bit

> of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not

> saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along with

> ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it, no?

>

> The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong Kong

> style of Chinese restaurant.

>

> And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a

> certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them. But

> I like 148, they try hard and make some nice

> dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the

> premises.



I was referring to the restaurant in chinatown which was known for rude staff and huge plates of food, see below


https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/restaurants/rude-awakening-at-wong-kei-7431958.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Satellite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Satellite Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > "work in Won Kei in China Town and the food

> is

> > > quite similar."

> > >

> > > Cheap and full of MSG then?

> >

> >

> > Never had an msg issue with either. That?s a

> bit

> > of a perpetual myth around such food. I?m not

> > saying it?s never used, but ?full of? along

> with

> > ?cheap? has a certain dismissive ring to it,

> no?

> >

> > The WonKei reference is more towards a Hong

> Kong

> > style of Chinese restaurant.

> >

> > And like any restaurant, if you don?t want a

> > certain ingredient, like MSG, just tell them.

> But

> > I like 148, they try hard and make some nice

> > dishes. Their Char Sui is home made on the

> > premises.

>

>

> I was referring to the restaurant in chinatown

> which was known for rude staff and huge plates of

> food, see below

>

> https://www.standard.co.uk/go/london/restaurants/r

> ude-awakening-at-wong-kei-7431958.html


So what?s your point?


That article was from 2001, it mentions the changes, but little else and nothing about MSG in the article. I?m wondering if you?ve ever eaten there?


Or is this a place that you?ve just heard about, and assumed it was poor quality, because it?s ?cheap? and therefore it?s assumed to be ?full of MSG?


Lazy conformation bias is a dangerous thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just had a carpets cleaned by Steve Nourse and his colleague at short notice. They are lovely guys and the cleaning was quick and carpets look great. Good value. 
    • Looking for tickets for 2 adults one child under 2 and one child over 2. However, please let me know if you have any combination of tickets you are no longer able to use.  Thanks 07756110500
    • all I said was "take a pro cash stance too far" - what twisting have I done?   plenty of good arguments for retention of cash - but let's not get too detached from reality either lest we go back to trading livestock   But to go back to your post DD:   "Or don't stop using cash" Yep plenty of people will agree with this - nothing controversial here   "Stop using your phone or even your watch as a banknote" - getting a bit weird now - why not - it's super convenient for both users and businesses. And far easier to keep a track of your balance using your electronic wallet than old systems of cheques taking days to clear, how much did I take from cashpoint 2 days ago etc. But people will differ so whatever works   "God only knows how much damage we're doing to the planet because all the above must require a hell of a lot of resources and juice from the grid" - big straw man argument here. Why bring this in? Unless you are also suggesting we don't buy any goods not made from within a 5 mile radius and nothing transported by air or sea? "a big lump of plastic with a screen and full of personal information that can be easily gleamed." I've had my phone stolen but nothing was lost because it was secure.I've been mugged and lost cash and valuable. It's not a binary thing   "your sky rocket with a phone in your hand. It's become a source of dopamine for many. It's an addiction for many."  Proper overreaching now There is a reason people like their modern phones - and it isn't just replacing cash. Replacing all of these functions in a tiny device is a magnificent achievement and to just boil  it down to "big lump with a screen" is reductive in the extreme  
    • I agree with the posts that housing is an urgent need in Peckham and throughout Southwark. But as Alice says, it’s the percentage of social / affordable housing that matters. In October last year, there were over 4,200 households on the Council’s waiting list for housing in Peckham alone (over 17 thousand across Southwark). But the developer is only offering 35% affordable housing (which means that 65% will be unaffordable). Both Southwark Council and the GLA say that a big development like this should provide 50% affordable housing.   Re-development of the site is a great opportunity to make the town centre “cleaner, safer and more sustainable and welcoming” (borrowing Nigello’s great words). Is this dense development going to do that, when it provides no real green and open space where people can spend time outside and nature can help us tackle the growing problems of climate change like absorbing flood water, cooling the air on baking summer days? Are 7-storey buildings along Rye Lane (where the average buildings are 2-3 storeys) going to be welcoming to users of the town centre? How will the development impact on Peckham’s economy? Currently there is busy daytime commercial activity of shops providing for different demographics and needs including a rich offering of international groceries and other products, alongside a thriving night-time economy. I can’t see anything in the proposal that suggests how it will enhance and empower the local economy. Yes please, let’s have a great development on this site that enhances the town centre. This means not letting the developer get away with packing people into dense blocks that turn their back on the town centre and which will be a recipe for urban decay in the long run. Peckham deserves better than this!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...