Jump to content

Cemeteries now open except for services, Camberwell New on Sundays, others daily


Recommended Posts

updated post.

Cemeteries are now open except for when services are occurring. As Camberwell New is in use Monday-Saturday,it is only open to the public on Sundays. Camberwell Old and Nunhead are open daily except for services for which they will be closed for general access. They will open at lunchtime following morning interments and will open in the afternoon after afternoon funerals.


Renata

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(edited)


The virus is an unfolding national tragedy but that should not mean public authorities making up the law as they go along, as we've sadly seen with certain police forces. That brings the law into disrepute and hinders the widespread compliance for a long time that we are likely to need to flatten the peak, rather than just move it back a few weeks.


Last week's Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020 do not apply to cemeteries (just crematoriums) and even make an exception to the ban on gatherings for funerals: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/5/made


There is no particular health risk from a funeral, so long as you keep at least 2m, which is new guidance issued today advises families of the bereaved to keep funerals small: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-for-care-of-the-deceased/guidance-for-care-of-the-deceased-with-suspected-or-confirmed-coronavirus-covid-19

In any event the burial grounds locally are very large with much of their area without space for new plots. And surely most people would now of all times leave space for people to grieve.


The cemeteries have been far quieter than parks and tranquil places for quiet reflection in these difficult times. Today I found Nunhead Cemetery closed so for the first time went into Brockley Cemetery which was lovely with bluebells out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renata - could you please post a copy of the government directive to local authorities to close cemeteries.

The only justification I have been referred to by a council officer relates only to crematoria, as has already been stated by others on here.

I'd like to understand why the council has taken this step, as cemeteries are not even mentioned in the Regulations and it makes no sense to close cemeteries while leaving parks open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kiera - "...cemeteries are not even mentioned in the Regulations and it makes no sense to close cemeteries while leaving parks open."

This was my point earlier in the thread, ie. where is the sense in closing cemeteries across the borough when it flies in the face of parks needing to be open for people's well-being?

No-one is saying cemeteries are parks, but for Nunhead cemetery specifically, it's massively utilised by those needing space rather than grieving/visiting graves.

I don't know about the detail of regulation, but reducing outside spaces in the most infected borough in the UK seems like a strategy aimed at trying to spread the disease (not saying it is), when inevitably the people trying to get out each day can only utilise the remaining open space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a matter of statutory interpretation, the legislation only closes crematoriums not burial grounds:

"5(8) A person who is responsible for a crematorium or burial ground must ensure that, during the emergency period, the crematorium is closed to members of the public, except for funerals or burials." [see ref in my msg above]

And as a matter of public health, the cemeteries locally are less risk of transmission than the overcrowded parks.


Despite this, Southwark has just sent an email to residents (COVID-19: an update for residents (1 April)), which ends on this subject:

"Cemeteries and crematoriums


In line with national government legislation during this emergency period, we have closed all of our cemeteries and our crematorium grounds, to all but those attending funerals. This will make the areas safer for grieving family and friends, at an incredibly difficult time, as well as maintain public safety. We will also be limiting the number of people able to attend funerals to 10, in an approach consistent with other boroughs. We know how sensitive these matters are, but must follow public health advice and discourage large gatherings, to help protect our residents from COVID-19."


Southwark's claim it's being consistent with other boroughs simply does not accord with reality, e.g.:

https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/bereavement-services/changes-due-to-coronavirus

"We suggest that you do not visit the cemetery or crematoria grounds during this time unless you are attending a funeral but if you do please observe social distancing and take any litter home with you.


Currently, cemetery grounds are open to the public during the normal advertised hours."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renata Hamvas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Due to a government directive that was

> issued last night to local authorities,

> all cemeteries are closed until further

> notice. This will therefore be applying

> to all Southwark Cemeteries and to

> those in other boroughs too.


Where can we see this directive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume there's various reasons


Not essential place to go during current crisis

Council staff will have been cut down to prevent spread so physical opening/closing will be affected

There will be increase in funerals

difficult to look after from police perspective

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The government directive is about avoiding crowds, so cremations have to be attended by immediate family only, and ideally those sharing the household only. No attended services. No burials either, I think, except for Moslems and I think orthodox Jews for whom cremation is not religiously acceptable. This is about avoiding crowds at ceremonies. As most 'gardening' work in cemeteries can be undertaken (sorry) with full social distancing there is no reason to stop that, I would have thought. Our local cemeteries are all small parks, but with a surprising number of paths (to get to all the grave sites) and hence a lot of walking space to allow social distancing. Many more paths per area than in a 'normal' park, in fact. Closing them is all about social control - like the Derbyshire Police drones - and not actually about social distancing. It's quite a Stalinist approach - so no surprises there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is a disgrace. Poorly thought out and reactionary. Locals rely on these spaces and they are identified as valuable open spaces within Southwarks own Open Space strategy. During these tough times safe occasional exercise by residents, utilising all the available open spaces locally is vitally important. Simply because we don?t want everyone crowded into the last remaining parks(!)

Even if there will be increased burials this can surely be managed.

Currently the new cemetery is being policed by a council worker. Due to there being no signage people are walking into the recreational field adjoining and then finding themselves trapped by heras fencing/ padlocks / rope at all the normal exit points(!) the only northern exit point is via a very narrow long path - which is increasing risk to locals.


In summary nonsensical and poorly actioned.


Southwark please sort this out - and give the locals their access back. Even in part would be appreciated - perhaps during certain hours at least?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renata, in light of the post by SIssi81 could you please act to ensure that access to Honor Oak Recreation Ground is restored and maintained as soon as possible. It appears that some Council staff may be trying to use the current situation to unlawfully close it to the public.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The below statement on the FONC site

https://www.fonc.org.uk/component/content/article/93-nunhead-cemetery-closed.html

links to this

https://www.iccm-uk.com/iccm/wp-content/library/Joint%20Statement%20on%20Coronavirus%20Act%202020.pdf

the only relevant part of is

"Clarification is currently being sought on if this same requirement to close applies to burial grounds."


So no doubt waiting on that clarification

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...