Jump to content

One Dulwich - who is funding it?


Recommended Posts

I appear to keep getting anonymous glossy leaflets through my letter box from One Dulwich. Does anyone know who is funding this? It seems to be a pro car lobby group trying to fight pro cycling road calming.


Is it masquerading as a community group but actually funded by an individual or organisation? It doesn?t say on their website. Having 800 ?members? doesn?t mean it?s not privately funded. The leaflets and website are quite slick. Is it done by a professional social media company? That would cost money.


Does anyone know who is funding One Dulwich??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea

It could well be a few residents who have stumped up a small amount of cash and some of them could have skills in design and so on.


Most of the original members were based in the village so I suspect no shortage of skills or money. Or are you concerned that they have funding via the council which would be typically ironic if it was true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much info - not much at all


Twitter account exists as @realonedulwich -> @onedulwich already exists and refers to this one as "No links to local drivers group with similar name!" twitter followed by 'Dulwich and Norwood Conservatives' but that's no smoking gun.



You can ask them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect the residents who feel they have been ignored by the council are pulling out all the stops to get as much support as possible for their group (which is not pro-car they just want a more balanced approach to council decision making that impact all residents in Dulwich).


One Dulwich have been very public in their request for people with relevant skills to offer their services to them so I suspect they have been deploying those skills when people volunteer their services.


One Dulwich are now heading up towards 1,000 registered - the momentum is gathering pace, just look at the map of Dulwich where people have registered - it's pretty compelling. https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters


By the looks of the amount of active One Dulwich de-positioning going on those who have had the exclusive ear of the council for so long are getting worried that the playing field is getting levelled.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn?t agree more.


Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suspect the residents who feel they have been

> ignored by the council are pulling out all the

> stops to get as much support as possible for their

> group (which is not pro-car they just want a more

> balanced approach to council decision making that

> impact all residents in Dulwich).

>

> One Dulwich have been very public in their request

> for people with relevant skills to offer their

> services to them so I suspect they have been

> deploying those skills when people volunteer their

> services.

>

> One Dulwich are now heading up towards 1,000

> registered - the momentum is gathering pace, just

> look at the map of Dulwich where people have

> registered - it's pretty compelling.

> https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters

>

> By the looks of the amount of active One Dulwich

> de-positioning going on those who have had the

> exclusive ear of the council for so long are

> getting worried that the playing field is getting

> levelled.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100Dulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I appear to keep getting anonymous glossy leaflets

> through my letter box from One Dulwich. Does

> anyone know who is funding this? It seems to be a

> pro car lobby group trying to fight pro cycling

> road calming.

>

> Is it masquerading as a community group but

> actually funded by an individual or organisation?

> It doesn?t say on their website. Having 800

> ?members? doesn?t mean it?s not privately funded.

> The leaflets and website are quite slick. Is it

> done by a professional social media company? That

> would cost money.

>

> Does anyone know who is funding One Dulwich??


In balance of fairness, I had a pretty glossy one from Clean Air for Dulwich through the door, which pre-empted the OneDulwich one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha - I think that One Dulwich is just funded via people who feel strongly. Look at the area the supporters predominantly live in, they aren't short of cash. The website is a squarespace one, looks glossy but not so expensive and there are lots of retired people involved who have plenty of time to dedicate. Don't think that its anything sinister or funded by a 'car lobby' etc.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fully agree with the aims of One Dulwich. When the schools go back in September, the closure of this junction will create massive tailbacks and worse traffic conditions in lots of local areas. The original junction was upgraded at huge expense 18 months ago, and actually made it worse. The alleged improved cyclist lane is a major danger to cyclists, as they can?t access it due to the way junction laid out. Basically the only way now to travel from east to west dulwich is via the south circular. As someone who walks, cycles and drives, there are so many ways I would love to see cycling provision improved. This hair brained arbitrary decision by the council must be stopped.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can get 5,000 leaflets from vista print for ?80, so 16 households chip in a fiver each for a worthy cause. And some volunteers to deliver low-cost high(ish) impact material.


Nothing sinister to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the maildrop is working - over 1,000 sign-ups now - it seems like One Dulwich have really hit upon something - many of us have been telling the council for a long time that they need to listen to more people and make their consultation outputs more reflective of community feeling as a whole rather than appeasing a small minority of the Dulwich constituents and inflicting misery on others as a result.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trinnydad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to say that One Dulwich is an abysmal

> failure. Not organised, no plan, no hope.

> Southwark and TFL must be relieved they are only

> dealing with a bunch of well-mannered, genteel old

> fuddy dudders.


Is that an opinion or can you show what your evidence is ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sporthuntor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I note this 100 Dulwich account was opened

> yesterday...just to attack what appears to be a

> bona fide local residents group???


Well spotted. Bloody cheek to insult the One Dulwich members too! Suggests he or she is worried!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sporthuntor Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I note this 100 Dulwich account was opened

> yesterday...just to attack what appears to be a

> bona fide local residents group???


That's how politics works - since 2016 anyway - people have learnt lessons on how to campaign from Brexit and Trump.


Adult arguments seem to be chucked out the window in favour of social media tinsel.


Even the question "who funds you ?" is something thrown around on both sides of Brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What would I do about cyclists?  The failed Tory manfesto commitment to train all kids was an excellent proposal.  Public information campaigns aimed at all road users, rather than singling some out, to more considerately share the road, as TfL have done, is welcome too. As for crunching vehicles.  I'd extend this to illegal ebikes, illegal e-scoooters (I think some local authorities have done this with the latter) but before that I would (a) legislate that the delivery companies move away from zero hours contracts to permanent employees and take responsibility for their training, vehicles and behaviour on the road.   More expensive takeaways are a price worth paying for safer roads and proper terms and conditions (b) legislate to register all illegal e-bikes and scooters so that when they are found on the road the retailer takes a hit, and clamp down on any grey markets.  If you buy an e scooter say from Halfords this comes with a disclaimer that it can only be used on private land with the owner's permission.
    • I know a lot of experts in the field and getting a franchise was a license to print money, that is why Virgin were so happy to spend lots of dosh challenging government ten years ago when they lost the West Coast franchise.  This will not be overnight, rather than when the franchise has come to the end. Government had previously taking over the operator of last resort when some TOCs screwed up. Good, at last some clear blue water between the parties.  Tories said they were going to do a halfway house, but I've not noticed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_British_Railways   : "On 19 October 2022, Transport Secretary Anne-Marie Trevelyan announced that the Transport Bill which would have set up GBR would not go ahead in the current parliamentary session.[15] In February 2023, Transport Secretary Mark Harper re-affirmed the government's commitment to GBR and rail reform.[16] The 2023 King's speech announced the progression of a draft Rail Reform Bill which would enable the establishment of GBR, although it has not been timetabled in the Parliamentary programme.[5] The Transport Secretary Mark Harper later told the Transport Select Committee that the legislation was unlikely to reach Royal Assent within the 2023-2024 parliamentary session.[17]"
    • Can't help thinking that regardless of whether Joe wanted to be interviewed, the 'story' that Southwark News wanted to write just got a lot less interesting with 'tyre shop replaced with ... tyre shop'! 
    • Labour are proposing to nationalise the railways, (passenger trains but not fright)  Whilst it removes them from shareholders control, and potential profit chasing, is it workable or will it end up costing tax payers more in the long run?  On paper the idea is interesting but does it also need the profitable freight arm included to help reduce fares,? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...