Jump to content

Trains towards London Bridge not stopping at East Dulwich today!


Recommended Posts

Problem with the platform 'equipment' apparently - though the mind boggles as East Dulwich is barely a station, nevermind one with 'equipment'. Apparently you can join the service at North Dulwich or Peckham Rye.


Southbound services will be stopping at East Dulwich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not one of the worst in the area around East Dulwich Station - it is in the leafier bits of Dulwich - mainly cos its a straight line measurement and the playing fields obviously don't have bus routes...


40 was a good bus - and it is ridiculous that it now doesn't go to London Bridge, but thankfully today its just East Dulwich thats the issue and not the whole line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

goldilocks Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its not one of the worst in the area around East

> Dulwich Station - it is in the leafier bits of

> Dulwich - mainly cos its a straight line

> measurement and the playing fields obviously don't

> have bus routes...


You've conveniently forgotten the Dog Kennel Hill Estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PTAL at ED Station is a 4 as it is for most of ED. Goldilocks is right about the Village - If you paved over all the green spaces, PTAL there would rise, but probably not something anyone wants to see.


Agree about the number 40. Don't know why it no longer goes to London Bridge. That said, we can now get the East London Line from Denmark Hill which is an improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 4 across most of East Dulwich. The Village get's a

> lower score, because it's low density / full of

> large green spaces.



2 around the Forest Hill Road area, plus the area surrounding Overhill and Underhill Road which is served by the P13. The area around Forest Hill Station and Hornimans is a 6 presumably due to having more bus routes and a very regular train service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

""PTAL is a measure of accessibility used by TfL based on distance and frequency of public transport. The areas with a high level of public transport accessibility usually score 5, 6a or 6b on the PTAL scale, whilst areas with very low levels of public transport accessibility will score 0, 1a or 1b.

The Dulwich area has a low level of public transport accessibility. Areas around the main stations only reach a PTAL 3 and The Village a PTAL 2 whilst the main commercial area around East Dulwich has a PTAL 3. Other parts of Dulwich, particularly those where schools are located have a level 2 of accessibility translating into a higher use of car and coach for pupils outside of Dulwich.

This is confirmed also by more general DfT accessibility statistics which show that, in general the area has a lower public transport accessibility level than the remainder of Southwark whilst by car it tends to be on par with the other parts of the borough or somewhat higher for hospitals, particularly due to the proximity of Dulwich Community Hospital".

Southwark Council - Dulwich Area Traffic Management Study Final Report

April 2018

London Borough of Southwark 23130501

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disruption at East Dulwich expected until the end of the day.


Can you tell me more about the incident?


A problem has been identified with the procedure for stopping trains formed of 8 coaches at East Dulwich, affecting Platform 1. This platform is used by trains towards London Bridge. In some cases, train doors would not be in the correct location alongside equipment on the platforms.


Southern services which call at this station are generally formed of 8 coaches, and therefore we are unable to call at this station in this direction.


A plan to reopen the platform is being formulated. Until we can confirm that the correct procedure is in place, we will only be able to use Platform 2.

https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/295465.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you've conveniently misunderstood the sentence, so probably best not to try 'snark' until you do.


PTAL is not 'one of the worst in southwark' in the area around ED station, it is worse in the leafier bits of Dulwich


HTH!



Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> goldilocks Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Its not one of the worst in the area around

> East

> > Dulwich Station - it is in the leafier bits of

> > Dulwich - mainly cos its a straight line

> > measurement and the playing fields obviously

> don't

> > have bus routes...

>

> You've conveniently forgotten the Dog Kennel Hill

> Estate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slight off-topic, I haven't been a regular user recently but the service to/from London Bridge seems like it's been reduced . Is this temporary? Noticed that the last train from London Bridge to ED is 10.30. Recall it being a lot later previously.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kerry2015 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Slight off-topic, I haven't been a regular user

> recently but the service to/from London Bridge

> seems like it's been reduced . Is this temporary?

> Noticed that the last train from London Bridge to

> ED is 10.30. Recall it being a lot later

> previously.


There's a 90 minute gap between services after 2230. The final train to East Dulwich is the 0001 to Crystal Palace.


From May 15th, the 2231 to Beckenham Junction will be the final train which continues to be an appalling state of affairs, although the Overground will still run after this time where you can change at Denmark Hill or Peckham Rye for local buses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is interesting..

Something must have changed to render platform 1 as unusable for 8-coach trains, because they?ve been running them for decades through ED stn.

Implication is either platform has to change (won?t happen overnight) or trains/train lengths need to change (unlikely to be resolved overnight).

Or they need to fessup what?s really the problem 🤣


ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Disruption at East Dulwich expected until the end

> of the day.

>

> Can you tell me more about the incident?

>

> A problem has been identified with the procedure

> for stopping trains formed of 8 coaches at East

> Dulwich, affecting Platform 1. This platform is

> used by trains towards London Bridge. In some

> cases, train doors would not be in the correct

> location alongside equipment on the platforms.

>

> Southern services which call at this station are

> generally formed of 8 coaches, and therefore we

> are unable to call at this station in this

> direction.

>

> A plan to reopen the platform is being formulated.

> Until we can confirm that the correct procedure is

> in place, we will only be able to use Platform 2.

> https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions

> /295465.aspx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may well be the case until they come up with something long-term, Southern may send a dispatcher to send the trains off on Platform 1.


There was a similar issue with New Cross Gate platform 5 with Southern services which are made up of 8 or 10 coaches where Southern had dispatchers sent up for their trains. London Overground weren't affected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ""PTAL is a measure of accessibility used by TfL

> based on distance and frequency of public

> transport. The areas with a high level of public

> transport accessibility usually score 5, 6a or 6b

> on the PTAL scale, whilst areas with very low

> levels of public transport accessibility will

> score 0, 1a or 1b.

> The Dulwich area has a low level of public

> transport accessibility. Areas around the main

> stations only reach a PTAL 3 and The Village a

> PTAL 2 whilst the main commercial area around East

> Dulwich has a PTAL 3. Other parts of Dulwich,

> particularly those where schools are located have

> a level 2 of accessibility translating into a

> higher use of car and coach for pupils outside of

> Dulwich.

> This is confirmed also by more general DfT

> accessibility statistics which show that, in

> general the area has a lower public transport

> accessibility level than the remainder of

> Southwark whilst by car it tends to be on par with

> the other parts of the borough or somewhat higher

> for hospitals, particularly due to the proximity

> of Dulwich Community Hospital".

> Southwark Council - Dulwich Area Traffic

> Management Study Final Report

> April 2018

> London Borough of Southwark 23130501


Most of East Dulwich has a PTAL of 4 (on scale of 0-6). It?s lower in the Village because large parts of it are green space. It could be better, but it?s not terrible and it?s not a good argument (as you often deploy it), for accepting forever greater car use.


https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/planning-with-webcat/webcat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rahx3 - not entirely correct - a small part of East Dulwich, closest to the station, has a PTAL of 4 - the rest has a PTAL of 3 or 2 and the Village and Peckham Rye areas are even worse.


This is why the council referred to the Dulwich area having "poor" PTAL scores in the Transport Report of 2018. A lower PTAL score is one of the reasons for increased car use (because there aren't public transport alternatives) and one of reasons why the council said LTNs should only be put in in areas with high PTAL scores. Dulwich does not have high PTAL scores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually if you use Rahx3's link - it shows that SE22 has a PTAL of 3 overall ( PTAL output for Base Year

3, SE22 London SE22, UK Easting: 533972, Northing: 174602) and SE21 2 overall(PTAL output for Base Year 2 SE21 London SE21, UK Easting: 533207, Northing: 172829)

Thanks Rahx3 nice link.

Here it is SE21 https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/planning-with-webcat/webcat?Input=London%20SE21%2C%20UK&locationId=ChIJxfDoilUBdkgRCMiU3DRkKu0&scenario=Base%20Year&type=Ptal

Se22 https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/planning-with-webcat/webcat?Input=London%20SE22%2C%20UK&locationId=ChIJWwzt2YQDdkgR2PRFR_mXuSI&scenario=Base%20Year&type=Ptal

PTAL is public transport in an area - not a train station or bus stop - it is a measure of how efficiently PT can transport one from one's home to a place of work or other destination.


Brixton 6b https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/planning-with-webcat/webcat?Input=Brixton%2C%20London%2C%20UK&locationId=ChIJ0fUEMjkEdkgRkcf2eo-_Kdk&scenario=Base%20Year&type=Ptal

Peckham Rye 6a

https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/planning-with-webcat/webcat?Input=Peckham%2C%20London%2C%20UK&locationId=ChIJTcNKP6cDdkgRKAPfDcz_IWU&scenario=Base%20Year&type=Ptal


Great link. Thanks. East Dulwich and the Village - very poor PTAL, a terrible idea to put LTNs in when PTAL so low.So when a train service is cut it must drop to being really, really terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't know how spoillable food can be used as evidence in whatever imaginary CSI scenario you are imagining.  And yes, three times. One purchase was me, others were my partner. We don't check in with each other before buying meat. Twice we wrote it off as incidental. But now at three times it seems like a trend.   So the shop will be hearing from me. Though they won't ever see me again that's for sure.  I'd be happy to field any other questions you may have Sue. Your opinion really matters to me. 
    • If you thought they were off, would it not have been a good idea to have kept them rather than throwing them away, as evidence for Environmental Health or whoever? Or indeed the shop? And do you mean this is the third time you have bought chicken from the same shop which has been off? Have you told the shop? Why did you buy it again if you have twice previously had chicken from there which was off? Have I misunderstood?
    • I found this post after we just had to throw away £14 of chicken thighs from Dugard in HH, and probably for the 3rd time. They were roasted thoroughly within an hour of purchase. But they came out of the oven smelling very woofy.  We couldn't take a single bite, they were clearly off. Pizza for dinner it is then. Very disappointing. 
    • interesting read.  We're thinking about the same things for our kids in primary school as well. One thing I don't understand about Charter ED is whether they stream / set kids based on ability.  I got the impression from an open evening that it is done a little as possible. All i could find on-line was this undated letter - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/_site/data/files/users/18/documents/9473A8A3547CCCD39DBC4A55CA1678DC.pdf?pid=167 For the most part, we believe in mixed ability teaching and do not stream in Year 7 or Year 8. The only exceptions to this are that we have a small nurture class for Maths. This is a provision for students who scored lower than 85 in their SATS exams and is designed to support them to acquire the skills to access the learning in mainstream class. We do not have nurture classes for any other subjects. We take a more streamed - though not a setted - approach in Maths and Science from Year 9 onwards. though unsure if this is still accurate reflection of policy, and unsure of difference between streaming and setting.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...