keano77

Let?s just say I now understand why you might have taken exception to my asking you to take a grip, my onanistic friend with the wet socks. Or am I now being offensive?

That crossed a line of decency? Titter

Unbelievable. KK asked a reasonable question and the CORRECT answer is Boris?s slur was used by at least one of the protestors (among other insults) but the slur did not cause these protestors to get out of bed on Monday morning and decide to head to Westminster and wait around in the hope that Starmer might appear so they could call him paedo and shout Savile at him. The protestors had better things to do involving all manner of conspiracy theories and it just so happened Starmer came along. It was opportunism. In short, to say a categorical yes that Boris was responsible for, or caused, Starmer to be harassed is WRONG and deluded.

Okay, let me try and put it in the simplest terms I can for you. Do you think Johnson was responsible for, or caused, Starmer to be harassed by a group of people the other night?

So you agree with me. Johnson was not responsible for Starmer being harassed even though every media outlet jumped on the Boris bashing bandwagon. Thanks, glad we got that straight.

I?m not aware anyone is disputing that Boris implying Starmer was to blame for not prosecuting Savile was wrong. The dispute arose about whether Boris was responsible, or caused, Starmer to be harassed. Which of course was nonsense no matter how many media outlets tried to push that view.

So the cabal is now judge and jury as to what is right and wrong. You couldn?t make it up. Translation - anyone who doesn?t agree with us is wrong and offensive. Dear oh dear.

That?s better DR. A bit more rational.

Thank you for your contribution j.a. It is possible my debating style needs a bit of work but I?m not sure what you mean by ?one of the nastiest posters on here? It strikes me what irks people is that I don?t sheep-like agree with them and it surprises them and annoys them. So for example, just because every newspaper, TV station, radio and most social media yesterday decided Boris was responsible for Starmer being harassed, and I disagreed, people get upset. DR is one of those people who gets upset - the masks slips and swear words and filth spew forth from his mouth in personal attacks. I?m intrigued j.a. That despite quoting such bile you make no comment whether it is acceptable on a public forum. Do you not consider any of that ?nasty??

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry keano, you're a jokester of a poster, > pissed-up on Koolaid and long gone down the rabbit > hole. > > Do everyone a favour and go back to masturbating > into your sock while watching GB News... Charming. Weren?t you well brought up. And you have the audacity to criticise people calling Starmer names? Idiot

Why are you trying to drag poor old Jo Cox into this DR? Do you think a little emotional twang helps you? Open your eyes you fool and see how this incident is being used as another stick with which to beat Boris. People like you are like puppets on a string, dancing to others? tunes.

Don?t understand Are you saying the protesters were racist nutters?

wordsworth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > keano77 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ?after protesters mob Keir Starmer? > > > > There?s only about five people there. > > > > I?ve seen uglier scenes in Waitrose after they > > stopped the free coffee and newspapers > > > > People need to get a grip > > > Are you on one or sthg? It was effing appalling. Small group of people call Starmer names shock What?s wrong with people? Being called names goes with the territory of being a politician. On the videos I?ve seen there are more aides, security guards and police around Starmer than people in the ?mob?. Makes me wonder whether the whole thing was staged

?after protesters mob Keir Starmer? There?s only about five people there. I?ve seen uglier scenes in Waitrose after they stopped the free coffee and newspapers People need to get a grip

I think all cyclists on the road should be insured, including children under parents?insurance. At the moment there is a presumption that if a cyclist and a car/vehicle are involved in an accident it it the fault of the driver of the vehicle. With the revised Highway Code there ought to be the ability for drivers to claim off cyclists? insurance.