beigemartin

I'm not sure the fact that he is paying monthly makes any difference. He is paying for the room to be available for him to say in. The flexibility is obviously where the issue us. The contract states: This is vague, probably intentionally so. At a push, I could see how he thinks Sunday is included in 'around those weekdays'. However, I would expect the 'flexibility' in a situation such at this (vague contract, lodging in someone else's home) to mean that he could stay after confirming it with you. After all, if he is expecting first refusal over all nights, without notice, then he should just be paying for those nights (since it prevents you using the room on those nights).

In some places it's not an issue though. I was in another, more modern, city with them for a while and there were wide pavements and grass verges and they didn't seem to impact pedestrians. We don't have those luxuries in our old city.

I've had community fibre FTTP for a few months. It's stupidly fast. I get 1000mbps over a wired connection and can get 500mbps over 5ghz WiFi when in the same room as the router. These figures are for both up AND down. If anyone wants to use my referral link we will both get £100 in Amazon vouchers: https://communityfibre.co.uk/friends?referral=1SGl4AUHYB

Staycation suddenly means holidaying in the UK. I'm sure it used to mean holidaying whilst staying (sleeping) at home. Word has lost it's interesting meaning and is now just annoying.

From the definition you post it seems it is not a meeting since the parents are there to supervise their children who are playing in the same location. They are not there IN ORDER to socialise.

See attached

Proven effective? Whilst I agree they might help, there is certainly no 'proof' particularly outdoors.

I'm not affiliated to this site, but you could find the message, click 'edit post' and remove the bits you want removed.

Hi Admin, Agree the RSS feed works when not blocked - I just included the validation response for completeness. I will try and find out the IP of my reader (it's cloud based so might not be easy :-( )

Mine feed reader stopped processing EDF again on 20th October. Did something change? Here are the issues I can see: 1 - EDF is not responding to requests from certain IP addresses (validator.w3.org and probably feed readers) - *I suspect this is the issue with my RSS reader* 2 - validator.w3.org reports validation fails on these (they might cause an issue for some RSS parsers): Using the element under RSS2.0 requires a valid email address (EDF RSS uses the EDF username) 3 - validator.w3.org suggests "In addition, interoperability with the widest range of feed readers could be improved by implementing the following recommendations." Remove &raquo (html '>>') from the forum descriptions. The front page shows 5 occurances of &raquo (html '>>') ie " Discuss life in London's East Dulwich. Talk about local restaurants, pubs, shops, services, transport, planning, it's up to you » " Missing atom:link with rel="self" - https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/warning/MissingAtomSelfLink.html

I tried emailing you yesterday and just got the bounceback saying "The response from the remote server was: 454 4.7.0 TLS not available due to local problem" Going to try again from a different address.

I will see what I can do

for me too - thanks for posting - i wouldn't have looked otherwise

I don't see how users using a local VPN can affect a mail exchange server because, unless they have their own one, it will be outside the VPN. @Administrator - is there any pattern with respect to the email address domain name?

It works, but it's not comparable to an email alert from a user experience perspective.