Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Considering my HV was practically useless when I asked her this, I thought I'd ask the real experts...


I'm weaning my son, and I'm confused about what I should avoid giving to him. I had heard that wheat, gluten and some proteins should be avoided until he's one, and also dairy, because I suffer badly from asthma (and used to suffer from eczma, but grew out of it in my early teens). It would be brilliant if I could give him proteins, as well as wheat and dairy (cheese! bread! easy peasy!) but I have been holding back because I don't really know where I stand on this. Son has slow/static weight gain and I am at my wits end trying to bulk him up a bit- no amount of shoving the boob in his face (he fusses when I try to BF, hello self weaning...) and formula feeds and Ella's Kitchen pouches seem to be doing much. He's on three meals a day, with fruity snacks in the mid afternoon too...would love to give him some pitta and (home made) hummous, but don't know if I SHOULD.


Any thoughts?

Hi Ruth,


In the book the health visitors give out, it just says to introduce common allergenic foods after six months and one at a time if there is a family history of allergies, so that you can tell what has caused any reaction in your baby. These include eggs, wheat, milk etc. The only thing it mentions holding off with for longer is peanuts, which it says to wait until they're three. Just cross referenced this info with Annabel Karmel - she says pretty much the same, so sounds as though little Seb should be fine with the bread and cheese, but maybe introduce one first and the other a few days later!

D'oh, I have Annabel Karmel's book too. Should've looked, really. Dearie me.


Definitely going to steer clear of egg as I have an awful reaction to them (a shame, I do love me egg and soldiers).


I'll be giving him some torn up pitta tomorrow, as an 'experiment' so he can have his bready snack/distraction whilst me and Nick are eating lunch. We may get to eat a meal with him awake without one of us having to hold him constantly! Imagine!

i have the same things - asthma and eczema and it runs on both side of the family, son already has the latter - but I gave him all the things you mention from pretty early in the weaning process. the only things I've ever seen an obvious reaction to (not any more though) where tomato sauce type things, but literally a v superficial reaction - ie w hen smeared on cheeks, they'd go red (after washing sauce off I mean). Apparently all the boys on husband's side did that. Anyway point is all the supposed 'baddies' seem fine so think it's a case of try it and see. I think as well as nuts (think perhaps this is because of choking hazard too), the other main thing people warn you to hold off on is honey. Pitta and hummous = fab staple so go for it!

I wouldn't trust AK as a source on allergies.. I don't think she is a qualified nutritionist?


I was worried v. much about allergies with son no 1 (asthma, eczema, food allergies, cows milk protein allergy and coeliac disease in the family) and delayed dairy, wheat and citrus until 9m+... used the Sainsburys "Free from"range for pasta/bread etc at first. Corn and rice pasta is easy to get these days

I don't believe she is qualified either. After her first child died of a rare condition I believe she spent a matter of years researching child nutrition, but never became qualified. Was she awarded an MBE though for her work? Anyway..


I too have been through all the above with my Daughter. A number of serious allergies run in our family, so have had to be very careful. I gave only fresh fruit and veg when I first started weaning and did so for the first 7 months ( my choice totally ). You can introduce things such as wheat at around 9 months ( wheat is a big one in my family but my daughter seemed to be fine with it at this age ) I waited until gone 1 year to introduce diary. You can introduce well cooked eggs from a year also, needless to say she didn't like them. I definitely will not give her anything containing egg in its raw form until she is probably over 2.


My daughter comes up in a rash if she has too much diary, but this isn't very often. I also found that she would come up in a rash with pasta, not bread though (figured this was the starch in the pasta causing this). Apricots produced a heavenly rash almost as soon as being put to her lips, so I dropped out any stoned fruit for a while.


If you introduce something new every week, they say 2-3 days but personally I don't find this really long enough if there are many common allergies in your family. Never introduce two things at once as if they is a reaction you wont know what has caused it.


Obviously this is just my advice from my experience. Just takes a while introducing one a week, but I will tell you I feel better for it now as I am very confident in what she can and cant eat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I agree with this, I'm afraid.  I see it every day within the industry - a lot of it is to do with the fact that the people working in it are younger now and don't realise how much they're being subconsciously indoctrinated by certain forces (social media and group-think), so they're now pathologically incapable of objectivity. Also, they don't read books, pick up the phone to experts, or generally know how to research properly.  On a lot of documentaries I've worked on, I've been leant on hard to peddle narratives that are not only heavily biased, but often outright inaccurate, and I've fought back where I can. It's really depressing,  I'd like to think that, at the BBC, I'd be immune from these influences, and allowed to project a 360 view, but it's sadly  not the case. You'd also be surprised at how toothless the BBC can be when presented with something that's irrefutable but could, say, upset Murdoch or the DM...  Hands up, I'm guilty of platforming extreme right-wingers, misogynists, anti-abortionists, racists, anarchists, pro gun lobbyists, rape-apologists... you name it, I'm all for putting them in a programme. Even though I deplore what they stand for, it's important to me to have a counter-view, and they almost always hang themselves.  (Job done.)  It's funny that certain people are up in arms about Rockets posting 'misinformation' in the Traffic threads, but  seem OK with it in broadcast, as long as it aligns with their views. You have to ask yourselves, what is it that you really want? If it's an echo chamber then just watch Fox News or CNN, however you lean. But then what's the point of it all? I fear the ship's sailed, so I don't know why I bother. 
    • That’s right, we could see them passing us at the stops and then as we overtook them. There was one moped without lights doing about 30mph.    Stupid is one word, but when it puts pedestrians at risk, it’s a different word. We’ll be raising it and hopefully get some publicity about road safety awareness 
    • Yes, your name and political views aren't mentioned there, you see. But what the title of the thread does refer to is a report in the Telegraph (and other right wing and, actually, left wing media) on an internal BBC memo that was considered by the BBC board on 17 October 2025 and which was so devastating the Director General himself considered he should resign.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...