Jump to content

SOLD - 1960s extending dining table - ?125


BigED

Recommended Posts

Mid-century dining table, originally sold through Heal's in the 1960s (according to those who sold it to us - a bit of research shows similar styles being sold through Heal's at that period).


It has been well looked after and restored with Danish oil, but, as you would expect, there are the usual minor knocks and scratches you might expect from a product of that age that has beeen used regularly. Some of these can be seen from the photos attached. Happy to provide more - just PM me - or for interested people to come to view it before committing.


Dimensions:

Length - 137cm, 182cm extended

Width - 90cm

Height - 74cm


The table has a lovely stripy veneered top. We've not been able to confirm the wood type - possibly walnut, sapele, iroko, rosewood or even a dark wych elm - but it is a lovely grain, as you can see.


We are selling in advance of building work. Price ?125.


The table doesn't break down so would need a van for transport.


Viewing/collection from Forest Hill, SE23. The photos included here show the table with and without the middle section that extends the overall length, plus a close-up of the grain. I have more pictures if you are interested.


Thanks,


BigED

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...