Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hidden away in Southwark's document is their estimate that the cost of re-opening Rye lane is ?200,000 !!!


The could have saved that by not closing it in the first place.

Similarly , 2 years ago they re-worked the Dulwich Village / Calton Avenue junction at a cost of ?500,000 only to close it completely after 6 months because of LTN.

Similarly the re-worked the EDG/Townley Rd junction at a cost of ?400,00 only to close it a year later becaus of LTN.


Needless to say there are other such blatant examples of wasted money within the Borough.


This Council is seriously INEPT and a good clean out is required next May.


https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/documents/s100450/Report%20Reopening%20Rye%20Lane.pdf


>

> https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgIssueHistoryH

> ome.aspx?IId=50026987

fottos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hidden away in Southwark's document is their

> estimate that the cost of re-opening Rye lane is

> ?200,000 !!!

>

> The could have saved that by not closing it inn=

> the first place.

> Similarly , 2 years ago they re-worked the Dulwich

> Village / Calton Avenue junction at a cost of

> ?500,000 only to close it completely after 6

> months because of LTN.

> Similarly the re-worked the EDG/Townley Rd

> junction at a cost of ?400,00 only to close it a

> year later becaus of LTN.

>

> Needless to say there are other such blatant

> examples of wasted money within the Borough.

>

> This Council is seriously INEPT and a good clean

> out is required next May.

>

>

> >

> >

> https://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgIssueHistoryH

>

> > ome.aspx?IId=50026987


Perhaps you might be interested in these figure for the brown bins when they started to charge and people did not want them anymore.


With regard to leaf picking up by residents perhaps you might be interested in the following, it took 6 months for the figures to be released.


Perhaps they should should consider how they waste money.

Dear Mr Tudor,


Please excuse the delay in replying to you regarding the brown bin subscription scheme. I can provide the following answer to your questions


1. How many people took up the offer to pay in the first year- 11902


2. How many people had their brown bins collected as they no longer wanted them - number of brown bins removed was 13,727 bins


3. Please see the table below which sets out the areas of one off expenditure and final costs for the initial roll-out of the service in 2019/20.




Description


Cost


Communications


?37,418


Container removal


?40,812


Container Purchase


?89,599


Container delivery


?57,190


Container repair


?10,190


Consultancy


?10,052


IT configuration


?9,524


Total


?254,785




The initial roll-out costs include a number of one-off expenditure items that are unique to the set up of the new service. Therefore, total expenditure is relatively high in the first year compared to the anticipated level of expenditure in following years.




The estimated level of expenditure to maintain the service from year two onwards is actually ?50k.




I hope this information is useful.




Best wishes,

I'm not cynical by nature, but 'follow the money' is a useful rule of thumb. Notice how keen the Council is on any measure for which funds have been promised from central government (bicycle lanes, re-worked junction at EDG/Townley Road, emergency COVID measures, LTNs etc etc..). I appreciate that they're hard up these days, but they jump at the chance of funding before the issue has been properly thought out or consulted on.

But again without being cynical, government seems to enjoy providing funds to local government for projects that might prove unpopular, thus diverting attention from the government's own failings.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...