Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought somebody would post this sooner or

> later!


Had to Jeremy, couldn't resist.

I'm taking bets on the number of posts before it decends into a full-on EDF Class war...hot favourite is after everyone's been to Pret for lunch.

Just done the test and had to do some tweaking to get the answer I wanted. I'm now happily Traditional Working Class, despite some stupid question about property value. So I can rest easy in my bed knowing I'm one of the few remaining Cockney sparra's left in the city they abandoned for suburban Essex, Kent and Herts all those years ago. An old School ED'er, no bugaboos or organic muesli in this house!


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought somebody would post this sooner or

> later!

>

> I expect a lot of people on here will qualify for

> the "elite" class.



Elite class "with a wood burning stove" Jeremy.


Radiators and gas fires are a bit - well, you know!

Tried the survey.. Traditional Working Class..


As I am Retired did the test again adding what I used to earn..


Come out Elite. Likely to go to galleries and the opera Even when I did not tick those boxes..


This is not the Full Survey (5 Questions).


The full survey takes 20 mins and you have to get a BBC ID and register.


Foxy

Annette Curtain Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Elite class "with a wood burning stove" Jeremy.

>

> Radiators and gas fires are a bit - well, you know!


Wood burning stoves are for aspirational underlings!


The elite class burn foxes in pits made of marble.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'Elite' and 'Precariat' certainly sound like the

> most fun categories to be in.



Indeed *Bob*


I'm trying to break out of my "Established Middle Class" shackles


Could one pass the key ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...