Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All


Was hoping to get some independent feedback on the Green Deal scheme and if it is actually worthwhile.


We have moved into a doer upper that is freezing cold and needs floorboard insulation, double glazed windows, new rads, probably a new boiler at some stage - these are just the things we know about. I'm sure if we had an assessment that they may find other things as well.


Was wondering if anyone had actually signed up the green deal and what their experience had been so far. I appreciate it's only recently launched.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/31106-the-green-deal/
Share on other sites

Floorboard insulation? Do you mean suspending insulation under bare floorboards on a ground floor?


Double glazing would take at least 15-25 years to pay itself back. Do you feel you need new radiators? Do they even qualify?


A good article here. Probably worth getting an assessment if it's free and you can cherry pick the quick and cheap wins.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/greenproperty/9924717/Eco-living-could-you-take-out-a-Green-Deal-loan.html

I think there's bit of confusion isn't there? t-e-d?


I may have misunderstood, but it's just a loan isn't it? Yes, it's paid back through a levy on your electricity bill and can only be used on greening your house, but it's just a loan?


The government seem to offer a few hundred quid subsidy at most, but if you're going to do major heating or insulation work it'll be a ?10,000 loan paid off over 25 years at around 7% to 8%.


There's even early repayment fines. Some deal. HMG seem to be loan-sharking?


You'd be better off in many cases simply extending your mortgage wouldn't you?


Happy to hear that I'm wrong?

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You could be right Hugunot


Indeed, he/she/whatever is entirely correct. Though I wouldn't be quite so cynical. Although you will end up with a dodgy loan and some 'consultants' in your life, it can be worthwhile, especially if you're going to rent it out, in which case it'll be the tenants who pay the loan off (as it's them that see the benefit - unless, that is, you go for a cashback deal before renting it out, but only a grasping cynic would think of that dodge).


Originally, I think, the Green Deal was just focused on insulation, rather than other forms of home-improvements, but that seems to have changed, possibly because cavity wall insulation isn't a visible reason for putting the rent up (no matter if tenants would be already paying for it all), so you may be able to get it all done.


You do, however, have to get an 'assessor' round, who will almost certainly not be trying to drum up work for their employer, and therefore won't necessarily focus on adding wildly expensive, and hard-to-repay, elements to your loan, so you might want to do your own sums. Unless tenants will be paying, naturally.


It's still not entirely clear what the loans will be secured against or who will be underwriting them, which may mean everything's been thought through clearly. It looks like the energy companies will be on the hook for defaulters, but that might depend on the exact terms of the contract. As I understand it, the deal-seeker (who may be the owner, landlord or tenant) gets a contract with the Green Deal Provider, who gets paid by the energy company (or one of them, depending if the dual-fuel trap's been avoided) who has a contract with the bill-payer (who may or may not be the owner, landlord or tenant) and nothing can possibly go wrong, apart from the minor inconvenience of a disconnection if a bill doesn't get paid. But I'd check the terms of any agreement very carefully before signing it.

As I understand it the green deal was always intended for any measure that leads to an improvement in the energy efficiency of a home, not just insulation.


Agree that with an interest rate of 7 - 8% the Green Deal could prove more expensive than taking out a home owner loan / remortgaging

Thanks all, for your input. I'm not too convinced by the scheme either, the only thing I thought might make it worthwhile is the Government cashback for various things.


One of the things that puts me off most is that the debt is tied to your home, and that if you sell the new owner takes on the debt. Can imagine that putting a lot of potential buyers off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...